similar to: Libvirt NAT-based network 2x-4x faster than Libvirt routed network?

Hi Is it expected behaviour that a libvirt NAT-based network is faster than a libvirt routed network? I would guess that the routed network would be the fastest one in all cases, but I'm seeing the opposite in my setup. On a 100mbit internet connection, the routed network tops at 4mbyte/sec, while the nat-based network goes all the way to 10mbyte/sec. I've spend the last 6 hours on

S pozdravem Stan.M. On 25.5.2010, at 18:00, centos-virt-request at centos.org wrote: > Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to > centos-virt at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >

Hi, Has anybody come across a situation where they were unable to register with Asterisk through a SIP stateless proxy server? I'm getting an error: "403 Authentication user name does not match account name" As far as I can tell the requests reaching Asterisk with and without the proxy are identical excepting the IP address the REGISTER request is coming from and the Via header

Having an issue with receiving faxes, but when I pass through the fax. Currently, I receive the fax with Digium's Fax for Asterisk, store it and the initiate an outbound call to our fax server. (XMedius Fax). This works, but we would prefer to have Asterisk simply route the call directly to the fax server and take the store and forward out of the equation. When I do that, however, the

I have the raw data with 9 column and 197977 row: > dummy State Months Bedroom 1 xxx Jan 1 2 xxx Jan 2 3 xxx Jan 1 4 yyy Jan 1 5 yyy Jan 2 6 yyy Jan 1 7 zzz Jan 3 8 zzz Jan 1 9 zzz Jan 2 10 xxx Feb 3 11 xxx Feb 4 12 xxx Feb 2 13 yyy Feb 1 14

Hi List, we're calling a sip phone from our Asterisk Server, and try to add logic depending on the dialstatus Stripped down example; exten = 494XXXXXXXXX,n,Dial(SIP/4120089,15,w) exten = 494XXXXXXXXX,n,Goto(98-${DIALSTATUS},1) exten = 494XXXXXXXXX,n,Hangup() ..... exten = 98-BUSY,1,NoOp(Busy) exten = 98-BUSY,n,ExecIf($["${Voicemail}" =

Hi, I''m having an issue with changing the source address of packets origininating from a specific user using a combination of iptables and iproute2. We want to change packets originating from a specific service so that they originate from that service''s IP address, so that we can move it to a different physical server and have the packets appear to come from the same

Dear All, I have the data some thing like this, I am showing here three days data only: > dummy.data <- read.table(file='dummy.txt',sep='', header=TRUE) > dummy.data StDate Domaindesc Logins 1 05/01/10 xxx 10 2 05/01/10 xxx 45 3 05/01/10 xxx 2 4 05/01/10 yyy 45 5 05/01/10 yyy 20 6 05/01/10 yyy

Hi, I have 2 internet connections (1 adsl/1 cable). I am try to route all outgoing mail from the mail server (on the same box), through the ADSL connection routing through the cable will mean mail will get rejected by AOL :( I am using qmail as the mail server. The configuration is: eth0 : cable connection ppp0 : adsl connection eth2 : internal lan connection I have configured split access as

This does not look bad, pretty ok. But im do have a question here. > ipaddress: 10.103.1.6 X.X.103.1 This indicated that the primary interface is eno2 > 2: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP > ??? inet 10.103.1.6/24 brd 10.103.1.255 scope global eno2 > 3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP > ??? inet

This is mildly off topic since it has more to do with TCP/IP networking than with CentOS per se. However, at the risk of ruffling a few feathers I would like some advice on how to resolve the following routing problem: Given: dual homed host running CentOS-5.2 with eth0 = 2xx.yyy.zzz.23 eth1 = 192.168.219.1 and a Cisco gateway at 2xx.1xx.y7y.1 with the following networks: interface

Hi Friends, I'm new to R.I have a data frame : xxx having columns color name values R XXX 10 G YYY 4 Y ZZZ 5 G XXX 2

> > Message: 24 > Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:53:55 -0400 > From: "John" <jses27 at gmail.com> > Subject: RE: [CentOS] OT: Setting a CentOS to gateway a private IP > address > To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <86C552A83B964E6499972CEAD4610189 at ethan27> > Content-Type: text/plain;

I'm running tinc 1.1pre11 with AutoConnect set to 'yes' and I recently started seeing lots of these messages on my VPN and cannot connect to various hosts from other hosts: (I have obscured the hostnames and vpn name, but otherwise this is a direct paste from syslog) Aug 19 14:51:51 AAA tinc.nnn[2217]: Got REQ_KEY from XXX while we already started a SPTPS session! Aug 19 14:51:54 AAA

We have frequent timeout problems after upgrading our imap servers from dovecot 1.1.16 to dovecot 1.2.11. One server acts as proxy only, and the other one is the "real" imap server". The credentials for the proxy service are stored in a remote MYSQL database. There were no trouble with dovecot 1.1.16. But now, with the most recent version, we get frequent login failures. It

Hi, I've done upgrade from Ubuntu 13.04 (samba 4.0 alpha) -> 13.10 -> 14.04 (samba 4.1.6). Now it looks I've lost some accounts. samba-tool dbcheck reports problems but cannot fix them with --fix param: ERROR: incorrect GUID component for member in object CN=MobileEX,CN=Users,DC=yyy-local,DC=localdomain -

# netstat -an | grep LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.32785 *.* LISTEN tcp4 0 0 130.238.4.133.22 *.* LISTEN What in ?@# is 32785 ?? # lsof ... sshd 11152 root 5u IPv4 0x7003ded8 0t0 TCP *:32785 (LISTEN) sshd 11152 root 6u IPv4 0x7004ded8 0t0 TCP xxx.yyy.zzz.hhh:22 (LISTEN) ... #cat /etc/sshd_config Port 22

I'm using realtime sip peers and I need to enable a range of IP addresses for a peer. I have: deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 permit = xxx.yyy.zzz.0/255.255.255.0 mask = 255.255.255.0 defaultIP = xxx.yyy.zzz.112 host = xxx.yyy.zzz.112 Addresses other than .112 are being denied. Can someone offer assistance? Am I doing something wrong? Bruce

On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Ludovic Gasc wrote: > 1. What's the "official" notation of each line: "=>" or "=" ? In the > wiki of Asterisk, I see very often "=>", however, what's the reason for > both syntaxes authorized ? Historical ? I'm not 'official,' but I have a strong preference for just '=.' Using

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:13:33 +0100 ncrfgs <ncrfgs@tin.it> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using the great 802.1d Ethernet Bridging support via > brctl along with Universal TUN/TAP devices created with > openvpn on a GNU system with a vanilla 2.6.8.1 Linux > kernel. > > > To start it: > > /usr/sbin/brctl addbr br${X} > /sbin/ifconfig brX