similar to: RHEL 5.5 Xen fixes

Hi I am having some problems installing a paravirt RHEL guest on a deb amd64 xen machine uname -a = Linux debxen 2.6.20-1-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 24 22:23:22 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux ============== xm info ============== host : debxen release : 2.6.20-1-xen-amd64 version : #1 SMP Tue Apr 24 22:23:22 UTC 2007 machine : x86_64

Hi There is a problem when creating a domU. I intend to install Solaris N90 on RedHat RHEL5 in paravirtualized(I''ve tried fully virtualized method, that''s no problem). #xm info release : 2.6.18-53.el5xen machine : i686 xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_32p My steps are as follow(install via NFS): 1 mkdir disk and mkdir Solaris 2 mount /dev/cdrom /disk/Solaris, it tell me that disk

Thanks all for your tips ! But this solution doesn''t work :/ I reinstalled Ubuntu and I partitioned it differently : / => ext4 /boot => ext3 swap I saw this bug on RedHat Bugzilla : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577511 How can I apply this patch ? I never did this... Thanks in advance... ----- Message d''origine ----- De : Fajar A. Nugraha Envoyés :

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466681 just to be sure that some one in xvm-team notices that before any bits from xvm-gate are putback ;) Florian

Distro: debian unstable Xen version: 4.0.0-2 This is the config: #HVM #still no qemu-dm in debian #kernel = "/usr/lib/xen-4.0/boot/hvmloader" #builder = ''hvm'' #memory = 2048 #name = "webserver" #vif = [''bridge=eth0''] #disk = [''tap:tapdisk:aio:/srv/xen/webserver.img,xvda,w'',''phy:/dev/cdrom,xvdb:cdrom,r'']

Hi: Reading Red Hat''s Website and a printed manual of RH184 (Red Hat Virtualization course) I see that RHEL 5 only supports RHEL 4.5 and RHEL 5 as paravirtualized guests. So I asume this is the same situation for CentOS 5, right? What''s the dependency between Xen versions for paravirtualized guests? I ask this questions because I got this experiences: 1. Running CentOS 5 as

Hi: Reading Red Hat's Website and a printed manual of RH184 (Red Hat Virtualization course) I see that RHEL 5 only supports RHEL 4.5 and RHEL 5 as paravirtualized guests. So I asume this is the same situation for CentOS 5, right? What's the dependency between Xen versions for paravirtualized guests? I ask this questions because I got this experiences: 1. Running CentOS 5 as Dom0 - RHEL

I''m going to set up a PVM on xen-3.3.1 debian-amd64. I need advices about the best methods to install a fresh debian on it (i.e. how to choose the kernel for pvm) . I''ve installed xen from sources and only have one xen kernel in /boot which I''m using for dom0; should I use the same kernel for domUs? There is any problem on use vcpus=2; the other vm is an hvm running

Hi, I''m trying to install a FC 16 PV guest. After installation the guest doesn''t load with: Error: Boot loader didn''t return any data! xend.log: [2011-11-14 18:57:32 32321] ERROR (XendBootloader:214) Boot loader didn''t return any data! [2011-11-14 18:57:32 32321] ERROR (XendDomainInfo:483) VM start failed Traceback (most recent call last): File

Hello, I created a paravirtualized Debian Squeeze guest (using virt-manager), after completing the initial setup I was asked to reboot, in order to finalise the installation. The guest startup breaks down with the error message: Error starting domain: POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon: (xend.err "Error creating domain: Boot loader didn''t return any

This patch is a significant performance improvement for the m2p_override: about 6% using the gntdev device. Each m2p_add/remove_override call issues a MULTI_grant_table_op and a __flush_tlb_single if kmap_op != NULL. Batching all the calls together is a great performance benefit because it means issuing one hypercall total rather than two hypercall per page. If paravirt_lazy_mode is set

Hi, I?m using libvirt version 0.9.12 under Debian Squeeze with and AMD Opteron 4280. Executing the virsh capabilities command only show me the following flags: <cpu> <arch>x86_64</arch> <model>Opteron_G4</model> <vendor>AMD</vendor> <topology sockets='1' cores='8' threads='2'/> <feature name='nodeid_msr'/>

On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:12 +0400, rush wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There are several Not tainted lines in old messages file. There are all of them: > > > > Sep 10 22:35:33 xen-dom0 kernel: [24183.985513] Pid: 2605, comm: > > debootstrap Not tainted 3.0.0-1-amd64 #1 Intel Corporation > >

For those of you that are stuck on and old version of Xen and want to use Ubuntu 10.04, here is a self contained pygrub, out of Xen 4.01. (64bit centos dom0) cd /opt wget http://dmarkey.com/~dmarkey/pygrub64.tar.gz tar zxvf pygrub64.tar.gz then set your bootloader to /opt/pygrub64/bin/pygrub Regards, David _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Dear *, I''m more used to work with RedHat like OSes. Still, I did not denied the request from a user who wants a domU based on ubunto. I usually use virt-install to do the job, with a script similar to this one: #!/bin/sh BASE=SL-4.7-i386-pv \ virt-install --nographics \ --nonsparse \ --paravirt \ --noreboot \

I've recently upgraded a Centos 5.3 machine to Centos 5.5. The hardware isn't HVM capabile so I'm only running para-virt guests. Using a vanilla i386 kernel boots without, but the newer kernel-xen locks up the Dom0 after a couple of minute. I'm only booting into single user mode for these tests so no VMs are active. *kernel-xen-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 - no issues

Hi, Keir, The following patches refines Xen support for CPU Xsave/Xrestore support. There are four patches included. Patch 1/4: Cleaning up existing Xsave code in Xen. Replace xfeature_low and xfeature_high with a u64 variable xfeature_mask. In structure hvm_vcpu, rename xfeature_mask to xcr0 Provide EDX:EAX with all bits set to 1 for XSAVE and XRSTOR as spec recommends

Hi list! Now when Fedora 10 is out, I thought of writing here what's needed to run Fedora 10 Xen domUs on CentOS 5 dom0. Fedora 10 does not have separate kernel-xen, but instead Xen domU support is included in the normal kernel-PAE.i686 and kernel.x86_64 (based on the pv_ops Xen support included in the mainline/vanilla Linux kernels). RHEL 5.3 beta (and final obviously too) includes

RHEL5 32bit xen 3.3.0 rpms? Anyone? ;) _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello, RHEL 5.7 has just been released, so here are some interesting Xen related bugfixes and enhancements in el5.7: Overview of Xen update in 5.7: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1070.html Technical notes about Xen changes in 5.7: https://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/5.7_Technical_Notes/xen.html Also kernel has a lot of fixes and updates: