similar to: xen host system capacity utilization

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "xen host system capacity utilization"

2015 Dec 09
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
This is pretty epic if true. I'm installing some Fail 2008r2 now to check. Is your hypervisor running CentOS 6 or 7? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" <dennisml at conversis.de> > To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt at
2015 Dec 09
4
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows >> 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was installed: >> "SUSE - Storage Controller - SUSE Block Driver for
2015 Dec 08
2
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
Hi, today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was installed: "SUSE - Storage Controller - SUSE Block Driver for Windows" Previously the disk drive was using the Red Hat virtio drivers which worked just fine but after the reboot after the update I just get a blue screen indicating that Windows cannot
2015 Dec 09
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
Op 09-12-15 om 01:00 schreef Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn >> <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows >>> 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was
2015 Dec 08
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi, > today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular Windows > 2008r2 update apparently among other things the following was installed: > "SUSE - Storage Controller - SUSE Block Driver for Windows" > > Previously the disk drive was using the Red Hat virtio
2015 Dec 09
2
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
On 09.12.2015 13:47, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > > > Op 09-12-15 om 01:00 schreef Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: >> On 09.12.2015 00:39, NightLightHosts Admin wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn >>> <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> today we ran into a strange problem: When performing a regular
2009 Oct 12
3
Xen to KVM migration
Hi, I'm thinking about how to go about migrating our Xen VMs to KVM. Migrating the configuraton should be easy using the virsh dumpxml/define commands but what is the best way to transfer the (logical volume based) images without too much downtime for the guest system? Can rsync operate on logical volumes? If so I could potentially use "dd" to transfer an initial copy of the
2007 May 03
0
Monitoring _real_ CPU utilization
Is there any way to monitor the _real_ CPU utilization for a given xen installation? I have a 4x dual-core AMD system running 10 domU''s, and I''m not sure if I''m overloading or under-utilizing the hardware. I''ve been using xentop to see how much virtual cpu each domU (and dom0) is consuming, but I''m finding it hard to figure out what the _real_
2010 Sep 23
0
Dom 0 CPU utilization measurement
Hi all, If I want to measure the Dom0 CPU utilization, which is a more accurate way among the following 3 options? 1. Running profiling program like "sar" in domain 0. 2. Running Xentop in domain 0 3. Running Xenmon.py in domain 0 By running these 3 different program, the results have certain differences. So I am confused here which to use.Thank you in advance. Lei
2005 Sep 08
1
xentop CPU% wrong?
Hello, I noticed that the CPU% reported by xentop appears to be too high. With dom0 idle xentop is reporting between 14-17% CPU utilization while at the same time top in dom0 is reporting 1-4% CPU utilization. I see that the TODO for xentop includes a task to make CPU% more accurate but looking at the code for xentop and libxenstat I''m not sure how to go about this. Assuming the CPU
2018 Feb 28
1
Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
On 27.02.2018 16:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 06:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > <dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only >> tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. >> Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum
2010 Mar 02
2
Thoughts on storage infrastructure for small scale HA virtual machine deployments
Hi, up until now I've always deployed VMs with their storage located directly on the host system but as the number of VMs grows and the hardware becomes more powerful and can handle more virtual machines I'm concerned about a failure of the host taking down too many VMs in one go. As a result I'm now looking at moving to an infrastructure that uses shared storage instead so I can
2009 Feb 04
6
Mixed dom0/domU usage?
Hi, I'm wondering about the impact of using both dom0 and domU's on a server at the same time. I'm worried about the performance impact of running a Mysql server in a domU and now I'm thinking about moving the Mysql part of a LAMP setup into dom0 and running a few Apache guests as domUs. Since the Apaches will serve mostly from an NFS share they won't have much impact on
2015 Dec 09
0
win2008r2 update on centos 6 host made system unbootable
Op 09-12-15 om 14:23 schreef Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > Yes, this is a CentOS 6 Host using regular libvirt based virtualization. The Suse driver is apparently an optional update that gets delivered using the regular Microsoft update mechanism. It's hard to believe that they didn't catch a completely broken driver during QA so my hypothesis is that maybe the new Virtio driver is
2015 Jan 24
3
VLAN issue
Do you need the whole configuration? On the switch end, we have the relevant VLAN (VLAN 48) with the assigned IP address of 192.168.48.101 and the range of ports (Gi1/0/1 - Gi1/0/8) assigned to that VLAN. Seems - and acts - like a legitimate setup and works fine, except for this particular instance. Thanks. Boris. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at
2011 Jul 21
3
Experience with Centos running off usb-stick(s)
Hi, I'm trying to build a redundant duo of firewalls/routers/gateways and I'm thinking about not putting any disks in them and instead using a usb-stick raid-1 as storage. Has anyone any experience with this? Since the machines will be running pretty much only iptables, conntrackd and keepalived there is not going to be a lot of disk activity going on and the plan is to do all the
2015 Jan 24
3
VLAN issue
Andrew and Dennis are spot on. Their conclusions about your server being connected to an access port and not a trunk port would be my conclusion as well. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn < dennisml at conversis.de> wrote: > Hi Boris, > what I'd like to know is the actual VLAN configuration of the switch > port (link-type and tagged and untagged VLANs).
2011 Oct 24
1
onboot=yes not working for eth0.x:y interfaces?
Hi, I ran into a Problem when using alias interfaces with vlans on a centos 5 box. When I define such an interface and do a "service network restart" the alias interface doesn't get started. Starting it manually works fine. Also after changing DEVICE=eth0.10:0 to DEVICE=eth0:0 in the config file the interface is started after a network restart. Does anyone have an idea what the
2009 Sep 28
2
Resizing disks for VMs
Hi, Is there a way to make a PV xen guest aware of a size change of the host disk? In my case I'm talking about a Centos 5.3 host using logical volumes as storage for the guests and the guests running Centos 5.3 and LVM too. What I'm trying to accomplish is to resize the logical volume for the guest by adding a few gigs and then make the guest see this change without requiring a
2007 Feb 02
1
Bug#409355: xen-utils-common: please make width of hostname column in xentop wider
Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Currently when hostnames are wider than 10 chars, the xentop output is messed up. Please add the following patch to support up to 20 chars, or better yet, allow the columns to auto size :) #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run ## xentop-name-width.dpatch by <apeeters@lashout.net> ## ## All lines beginning with