similar to: KVM and Virt-manager

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 4:00?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again > I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd > > apt list --upgradable > Listing... Done > glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] > glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2

Hi again I just noticed that there is some updates from glusterd apt list --upgradable Listing... Done glusterfs-client/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-common/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] glusterfs-server/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfapi0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 11.0-1] libgfchangelog0/unknown 11.0-2 amd64

Ok. No problem. I can test it in a virtual environment. Send me the path. Oh but the way, I don't compile gluster from scratch. I was used the deb file from https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Debian/ --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 09:21, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: >

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:56?PM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Xavi > That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? > It should be safe, but I wouldn't test it on production. Can't you try it in any test environment before ? Xavi > > --- > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > (47) 99676-7530 -

After force the add-brick gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 force volume add-brick: success pve01:~# gluster volume info Volume Name: VMS Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: e1a4f787-3f62-441e-a7ce-c0ae6b111ebf Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:

Hi Xavi That's depend. Is it safe? I have this env production you know??? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira (47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram Em ter., 16 de mai. de 2023 ?s 07:45, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan at redhat.com> escreveu: > The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the > problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the

I found this https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Server_2012_/_2012_R2_DC_to_a_Samba_AD 2016-09-13 15:23 GMT-03:00 Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com>: > More info: > > I did a fully windows update, but still get the error. > The time on server and on client are the same! > The Samba Server, which is the DNS Server as well, is set as primary DNS

What's the volume structure right now? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 18:24, Gilberto Ferreira<gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present

So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant co nfiguration. Use 'force' at the end of the command

Still getting error pve01:~# gluster vol info Volume Name: VMS Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: e1a4f787-3f62-441e-a7ce-c0ae6b111ebf Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x 2 = 6 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: gluster1:/disco2TB-0/vms Brick2: gluster2:/disco2TB-0/vms Brick3: gluster1:/disco1TB-0/vms Brick4: gluster2:/disco1TB-0/vms Brick5: gluster1:/disco1TB-1/vms

The referenced GitHub issue now has a potential patch that could fix the problem, though it will need to be verified. Could you try to apply the patch and check if the problem persists ? On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 2:10?AM Gilberto Ferreira < gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. > > Any fix about this issue? > > May 14 07:05:39

Yes but I want to add. Is it the same logic? --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira +55 (47) 99676-7530 Proxmox VE VinChin Backup & Restore Em ter., 5 de nov. de 2024, 14:09, Aravinda <aravinda at kadalu.tech> escreveu: > Hello Gilberto, > > You can create a Arbiter volume using three bricks. Two of them will be > data bricks and one will be Arbiter brick. > > gluster volume

Hi there, anyone in the Gluster Devel list. Any fix about this issue? May 14 07:05:39 srv01 vms[9404]: [2023-05-14 10:05:39.618424 +0000] C [gf-io-uring.c:612:gf_io_uring_cq_process_some] (-->/lib/x86_64 -linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x849ae) [0x7fb4ebace9ae] -->/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a2e5) [0x7fb4ebad42e5] -->/lib /x86_64-linux-gnu/libglusterfs.so.0(+0x8a1a5)

But if I change replica 2 arbiter 1 to replica 3 arbiter 1 gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 I got thir error: volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant configuration. Use

Ok! I got it about how many disks I can lose and so on. But regard the arbiter isse, I always set this parameters in the gluster volume, in order to avoid split-brain and I might add that work pretty well to me. I already have a Proxmox VE cluster with 2 nodes and about 50 vms, running different Linux distro - and Windows as well - with Cpanel and other stuff, in production. Anyway here the

I would like to help with this VFS, but my skill as programmer is near 0!... but I am openning to test if some one write it... But I get the idea! It's seems very simple, for those has the right skill to do that 2016-09-29 14:34 GMT-03:00 Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:25:18PM -0300, Gilberto Nunes via samba wrote: > > WOW! That's could be

Ok! Let try it again! I really meant join the Samba AD Domain as domain member. I wonder why I can do it with Windows 10, which is newer than Windows 2012 R2. Thanks any way. 2016-09-13 15:03 GMT-03:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:47:18 -0300 > Gilberto Nunes via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello list

More info: I did a fully windows update, but still get the error. The time on server and on client are the same! The Samba Server, which is the DNS Server as well, is set as primary DNS Server to Windows 2012 R2. I am able to ping to ad-master, which is the Samba AD. Windows 7 and Windows 10, Windows 2008 and Windows 2008 R2 are able to join the domain as domain member. Just Windows 2012 R2 are

I assume you will be using the volumes for VM workload.There is a 'virt' group of settings optimized for virtualization (location at /var/lib/glusterd/groups/virt) which is also used by oVirt. It guarantees that VMs can live migrate without breaking. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 19:00, Gilberto Ferreira<gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: Hi there.

This problem, in the computer park there is a domain controller microsoft without shared printers, I need to use another server with samba shares + cups, but with authentication in the microsoft active directory. I try parameters securty = ads (join machine in domain) and user ( cant read users with nslcd and nsswitch , but only work with ssh and apache. Topology 1 server microsoft windows (