similar to: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3]

On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 12:00 -0500, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > Message: 35 > Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:45:45 +0100 > From: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler at riscworks.net> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] system startup sound > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <4D025939.6030109 at riscworks.net> > Content-Type: text/plain;

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thus Karanbir Singh spake: > On 01/05/2011 04:03 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> Sure, this is what I understand. However, does this exclude people >> willing to help (read: raising the manpower of the project rebuilding >> RHEL)? If so, yes, I misunderstood. >> > > Thats bonkers. There *was* a specific callout for help,

Hi list, due to the necessity of having a patched KVM running, I build some new RPMs. However, only kmod-kvm-83-105.27.x86_64.rpm is important to replace the 'original' one as it's the only package that contains the patch. I didn't rename the packages, though, hopefully in order not to break the upgrade path provided to us. The patch adresses following problem: 'Fix a race

May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) Cheers, Timo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi (Ralph), I'd like to edit my personal page (would be nice to link images from here to the interview); could you please grant me the appropriate permissions? TIA, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLsf9cfg746kcGBOwRAqyOAKCL3MNTytzJQFwTZLlGZK8dosQ6bQCeM9Vc Nb1FSj82NIfv64MfY21MHy4= =KaiJ -----END PGP

hi, in the WHATSNEW.txt it is stated that the problem with root-processes in version 2.0.2 is solved. (fromw WHAT'S NEW): > 5). Attempt to fix the AIX 4.1.x/3.x problems where smbd runs as > root. As no-one has given us root access to such a server this > cannot be tested fully, but should work. we have on our samba-server n14: AIX 4.3.2 DCE 2.2.0.5 Samba version 2.0.5a i have it

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 (and OpenVZ, and some home-brew L2TP daemons, RIPd, BGPd, etc). There's a (VE in OpenVZ speak) virtual machine that has two ethernet interfaces, seen as eth0 and eth1, respectively. Those live in VLANs, but it's not important here. The thing is that on eth1 the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC. Those screenshots show windows and buttons that exactly match my CentOS GNOME Desktop [1]. AFAIK, SuSE/Novell has different skins, as has (Open)Solaris and AIX, for instance. So, has there anybody more

Timo, Its interesting, I am presently attending a conference in NYC and in one of the tables I saw the redhat vendor. My first question to them was " What do you think about centos", they reply "You are using a distribution without support and that is prompt to failure..." I don't think this is an accurate statement is it? Anyway to make the story short, they keep telling

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to translate the orignal page into a german one. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.5/German Could you (@Ralph) please create it? TIA Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL5+cIfg746kcGBOwRAiQVAJ9QdqD1Pdm5fVte59v7zBdStjWahgCdGDZa 59kYF9j2CQhbMfdH0Raunzo= =TL76

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There's progress... http://press.redhat.com/2010/10/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-release-candidate-available-to-partners/ Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMvEWlfg746kcGBOwRAtHpAJ9/ylHRb8hAIBp4mvaNSPN36qrkzACfafrY 628MfhiRdSkK+9FWRuE8wJQ= =NtpF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, a german IT news site [0] today posted that Amazon Linux AMI is based on CentOS 5.5 -- is that true? Maybe this would be stuff for the next newsletter... ;) Cheers, Timo http://www.golem.de/1009/78088.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMl2Nxfg746kcGBOwRAg8sAKCelTvLYTNxVBjtOxteb7/hQY2eowCfYFzP

Hi list, just out of curiosity: Was anybody affected by this? http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2012-August/033611.html Cheers, Timo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, in May 2015 I reported [0] that I can not import my S/MIME certificate. Issuer is GlobalSign. Jan Horak reassigned it to the nss guys ("This seems to be problem in NSS code, reassigning to nss component"), but then the ticket idled and was eventually closed by EOL of Fedora 21 (though I stated it persists with F22). I just reopened

Hi list, during the last days there was a discussion going on about the stability of XFS; though I myself used XFS heavily and didn't run into issues yet, I'd like to ask something *before* we create our next generation data storage backend... Les Mikesell wrote in [0] about issues in the combination of XFS and LVM -- however, it was being discussed in context of using 32bit kernels.

hi 2015-06-11 11:10 GMT+02:00 Timo Sch?ler <timo at riscworks.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > some months ago I ran into a hassle with following, quite simple > config that works on CentOS 6 and CentOS 5 extremeley well, for years. > However, I have problems getting it running on CentOS 7. > >

Hi Timo, Am 28.01.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Timo Schoeler: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -v <= !!! > #smtp inet n - n - 1 postscreen > #smtpd pass - - n - - smtpd > > smtpd -v instead of smtpd -- that will hopefully give

I've updated: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EOLC3 which, of course no longer applies to just one major release I am unfamiliar with the process of pushing through a rename of a page, but I see copies of change notices with Ralph doing it from time to tome. May I request an assist here please? -- Russ herrold

Hi all. Decided to upgrade an old Slackware 10 box I had. The box is running a VIA C3 processor and apparently doesn't support the cmov extension that most i686 processors do. As a result I cannot install CentOS 5. I discovered a few posts from way back in April: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-April/079352.html

I am trying to install Centos 4 on an Asus terminator c3 with the via chipset. It keeps on rebooting. It won't install. It's a P3 800Mhz made by Via with 512Mb RAM. I have searched and found nothing about it. Any suggestion? -- Thanks