similar to: Greetings!

Hi, I'm a 47-year-old Austrian living in South France, and the manager of a small IT firm based on Linux and free software. A while back I have been a CentOS user, I was proficient with versions 4.x and 5.x, and I even published a book based on CentOS 5.x. After a stint on Debian, I based all my server and desktop solutions on Slackware (http://www.microlinux.fr/slackware/), which was my

Are IVR and "Auto Attendant" interchangeable terms? They both do the "Press 1 for" thing. Sales is asking me how to word it and I've always used both terms interchangeably.

Has anybody here taken a HDD configured with an Opteron system, and then put it into an Athlon/64 and had it work? Are they interchangeable, like an Athlon/32 and a P3/P4? -Ben -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978

I have the following statement mock_requester.should_receive(:request_with).with ("x").any_number_of_times.and_return(@object) which works fine, but when i do it backwards, which makes the same amount of sense syntactically, it fails mock_requester.should_receive(:request_with).with("x").and_return (@object).any_number_of_times are all of the mock options

I'm noticing True and False seem to be interchangeable with Yes and No in smb.conf. Can someone confirm? Does this apply to all params?

Hi list! While looking for the Snom 190 I found another phone, the Elmeg IP 290 (www.elmeg.de). Looking at the pictures & the specs they seem to be very similar beasts but the firmware is supposedly not interchangeable. Does anyone know the difference between the 2, do they work with Asterisk? The weird thing is that Elmeg has similar phones with the Snom look but they are ISDN only (no

I'm trying to write a backend for a machine that has both byte and word instructions. Both varieties of instructions operate on the same set of general registers. A byte mode instruction on a general register always clears the upper bits. Register-to-register byte mode and work mode instructions set condition codes based on bytes and words and thus are not interchangeable. Do I need to

Just started learning on rails. The first few time I edited a migration file it was using colons like: create_table :table do |t| t.column :column, :string Now I''m working on a tutorial where it''s using quotes for the table and column names: reate_table "table" do |t| t.column "column", :string Are these two ways interchangeable ? Is there a

Hi guys, I'm really sorry to bother you with this but I'm really battling and can't find any info to solve my problem. Please have a look at my issue below and give me some guidance as to what could be causing it. Thanks in advance. Kindest regards David Wilson _______________________________ D c D a t a Tel +27 33 342 7003 Fax +27 33 345 4155 Cell +27 82 4147413

Evan Cheng wrote: > I am pretty sure the .cpp files always explicitly use "llvm" namespace. Look for: > using namespace llvm; > > Is that sufficient? > No; once it's visible through ADL (because ilist<>::iterator extends std::iterator) there's no hiding or precedence mechanism we can exploit. On the other hand, AFAICT std::next is interchangeable with

On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Paul Littlefield wrote: > So, I will... > > * P2V my Gentoo DC1 exactly as is. > * P2V my Ubuntu DC2 exactly as it. > > ...and be done with it. > > That sound OK? Either that, or just create a new VM on your OS of choice and join it to the existing domain as a new DC. Claim all the FSMO roles, and shut your old DC down. It will have a new name and

I was working on https://reviews.llvm.org/D81911 to try and fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46340 . Through the review process we happened upon a design limitation or perhaps a potential mis-modelling of GlobalIFunc in the IR object hierarchy, which leads to some problems in LTO flows. To summarize, as it currently stands (and in the hopes of faithfully representing the conclusions of

Please help with this. Kindest regards David Wilson _______________________________ D c D a t a Tel +27 33 342 7003 Fax +27 33 345 4155 Cell +27 82 4147413 http://www.dcdata.co.za support@dcdata.co.za Powered by Linux, driven by passion ! _______________________________ "Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are." ----- Original Message ----- From: "David

Guess who's here to do an Asterisk demo this week without the power supply for his SPA-841. I have an ATA186 with me. Both phones use a 5v supply. Does anyone know whether the supplies are interchangeable? Thanks in advance; sorry for the noise. B.

On Jul 9, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Talin wrote: > I'm using the various LLVM set containers (SmallPtrSet and the like), and something I need to do fairly often is iterate over a set, removing all elements that don't pass a test. Now, doing this on lists is fairly straightforward using the "it = container.erase(it)" idiom so as to keep the iterator valid during the delete. However,

Hi guys, Does anyone have any ideas on my questions below ? Kindest regards David Wilson D c D a t a Tel +27 33 342 7003 Fax +27 33 345 4155 Cell +27 82 4147413 MSN: dave@dcdata.co.za http://www.dcdata.co.za support@dcdata.co.za sales@dcdata.co.za KZN's first and only pure Linux solution provider ____________________________________________________ LinuxBox S.A.: Africa's shell

Hi guys, Unfortunately this is still happening I've tried restarting Samba. Users who should be denied access after 21:00 are being denied access at 19:00. Our time zone in South Africa is GMT+2. Perhaps I should set the timezone on the server to UTC/GMT ? Do you think this will help ? Should I then leave the time set to the current time in South Africa ? Or should I set the time to the

On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Bagel wrote: > I'm trying to write a backend for a machine that has both byte and > word > instructions. Both varieties of instructions operate on the same > set of > general registers. A byte mode instruction on a general register > always clears > the upper bits. Register-to-register byte mode and work mode > instructions set

Dear R community, I am analyzing plant communities with the function mvpart, using a dissimilarit matrix as input. The matrix is calculated with the funtion gdist. fit <- mvpart(gdist (ba12[,18:29], meth="maximum", full=TRUE, sq=F) ~ beers + slope_dem + elev_dem+ plc_dem + pr_curv+ +curv+max_depth+doc_rocks+ abandon+land_use+ca_old, data=ba12, xv="p") This

July 15, 2019 1:16 PM, "Bruce Hoult" <brucehoult at sifive.com> wrote: > Take, for example, RISC-V. You have 32 registers that, in the base > fixed-length 32 bits long instruction set, are absolutely > interchangeable with each other. No instructions use implicit source > or destination registers, any register can be used for anything. There > is no fixed stack