similar to: License of the nutshell package

On Monday 10. September 2007 01:10:44 Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 9/10/07, Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen@runbox.com> wrote: > > It is indeed necessary. I hope this format will be a huge leap in > > metadata descriptions for media content. Not only for music, but any > > media found in Oggs. > > You are thinking too small. Such standards

Hi, Is using Red Hat site for documentation legal? If I understand correctly you have to be a customer of Red Hat to be allowed to use their bandwidth: https://access.redhat.com/help/terms/ "2. Terms Applicable to Red Hat Content. In order to access a Red Hat Portal and Red Hat Content, you must be a current Customer of Red Hat or its affiliates [.......] "Some Red Hat Content may

and this time with a decision, please. Hi, I just had a talk with someone on IRC who wanted to reuse stuff from <http://wiki.centos.org/MarketingMaterial> and asked me about the licensing of content on there. Which made me think "Well, let us restart this discussion again". We *do* need a license for content on the wiki. The three licenses we're favouring (well, sort of)

Okay, this will never come to an end otherwise: I would like to use <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/> as the license for the complete content of the wiki. The content on the wiki is *NOT* licensed at all at the moment. So this call goes out to *ALL* people who have already contributed to the wiki: Is it okay with you to use this license for your content on the wiki? If

Hi Daniel, On 9/10/07, Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen@runbox.com> wrote: > It is indeed necessary. I hope this format will be a huge leap in metadata > descriptions for media content. Not only for music, but any media found in > Oggs. You are thinking too small. Such standards should not be made to just work with Ogg, but rather possible to work with any media format out

Has Centos been tested for this yet? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200507-05 ] zlib: Buffer overflow Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:23:20 +0200 From: Thierry Carrez <koon at gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-announce at lists.gentoo.org CC: full-disclosure at lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq at securityfocus.com, security-alerts at

Hello all, It has come to my attention in a rather unfortunate chat that some artists do not use Vorbis (or FLAC) because they offer no standard way to put a license into it. In an age of Creative Commons and Copyright-awareness this is a valid concern, although I'm not sure how those artists work with MP3's ID3 in a standard way, considering all the hacks floating around. Anyway, Ogg

Hello all, It has come to my attention in a rather unfortunate chat that some artists do not use Vorbis (or FLAC) because they offer no standard way to put a license into it. In an age of Creative Commons and Copyright-awareness this is a valid concern, although I'm not sure how those artists work with MP3's ID3 in a standard way, considering all the hacks floating around. Anyway, Ogg

Hello all, It has come to my attention in a rather unfortunate chat that some artists do not use Vorbis (or FLAC) because they offer no standard way to put a license into it. In an age of Creative Commons and Copyright-awareness this is a valid concern, although I'm not sure how those artists work with MP3's ID3 in a standard way, considering all the hacks floating around. Anyway, Ogg

After John Todd's talk at Astricon about the ISN project, I spent much of the weekend playing around with it. I have discovered that the default dialplans on my Sipura gear, as well as my Grandstream phones, intercept the "*" key that is a required part of ISN numbers and interpret it as a "metacharacter." Googling for a while has turned up evidence that this can be

On 10/14/2013 8:20 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org >>> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have a whole bunch of readers(we would have some more too), and was >>> thinking if we should

Daniel, these are all good ideas and worth progressing. However, it may be better not to merge too many goals in one format (MPEG-7 did that and ended up as a big mess). So, I suggest to start by structuring the types of things you want - then finding out which parts belong where into existing formats such as vorbis comment, Skeleton and CMML, and only then start to develop a new format. For

I am working on a small model mixin called attachment_kung to make attachment_fu polymorphic, so you no longer need a different table and Model class for every associated attachment (Productimage, Ad_doc, etc). All you really need is one model and table to handel all your attachments - in some cases, anyway. I have the code working, but have run into one small hitch that I can''t seem to

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org>wrote: > On 10/14/2013 8:20 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Shankar Easwaran < >>> shankare at codeaurora.org >>> >>>>

I am trying to add a copyright disclaimer outside the plot borders of some images I have created. I can use mtext() to add the written portion, but I would like to have the Creative Commons license image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cc.logo.circle.svg) before the text. I've found that I can plot a .png image inside the plot boundaries using rasterImage() but I can't figure out how to

Hi all, I downloaded the newest package in the hopes of a changelog so I can ask for packaging in the distribution but there is no changelog in the Changelog. It was empty. The only thing which was relevant was in the News. Why the changelog is kept if its not gonna be used? -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal This email is licensed under

Hi all, While we were talking of theora PPA's it occured to me is there somebody who has made a howto to compile libtheora 1.1 alpha support in ubuntu 9.04 Why? 2 reasons . a. Whether we like it or not, Ubuntu is arguably one of the more successful distributions. b. When we compile any software we have the freedom and choice to add in flags which make it better for the individual. --

Hi all, In order that theora is the default, there is need for more and more tools and sites to support it. In that area I came across videopress in my web wanderings. http://videopress.com/ which is supposed to be a 'complete video solution' for putting on the web. I also saw that videopress has a plugin http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/video/ The fact that the plugin

Hi documentation team, As CentOS 6 is now being released to the mirrors, it would be a good time to think about putting the accurate documentation on http://www.centos.org/docs Red Hat changed their documentation license in the past and they are now using the CC-by-SA license. My own understanding (but IANAL) is that we can just share the documentation , and just linking back to upstream

>>>>> Charles Geyer writes: > In that case, perhaps the question could be changed to could CC0 be > added to the list of R licences. Right now the only CC licence that > is in the R licenses is CC-BY-SA-4.0. Hmm, I see Name: CC0 FSF: free_and_GPLv3_compatible (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0) OSI: NA (https://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero) URL: