similar to: R 2.12.1 in Fedora Updates Testing

R 2.12.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). I did not do this build for Fedora 12, as that release will be End-Of-Life in a month. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in

R 2.11.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). It will likely be the last R update for Fedora 11. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us

R 2.11.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing". In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us test these packages, and move them forward. Here's how: 1. Go to the Fedora Updates web

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to

Hi Tom, I'm seeing another similar build failure with the recent 3.3.0-5 and I'm a bit stumped about what's going on. On a fresh VM, after installing 3.3.0-5 and then running: install.packages(c("lpSolveAPI), method="curl", repos=" https://cran.rstudio.com") the build fails with: gcc: /builddir/build/BUILD/R-3.3.0/zlib-1.2.8/target/usr/lib64/libz.a: No

I know, I know, you've heard this song before... ;) EL5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-09c8007e64 EL6: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a9e4df655 Please go download -8 and test it. It looks good on my end. If it works for you (with CRAN modules), please give positive karma so it will land in updates-stable faster than two weeks. Thanks

Hi, I have the following error in syslog when starting virt-manager and trying to connect: May 25 16:39:33 sage libvirtd: 16:39:33.525: error : remoteDispatchAuthPolkit:3846 : Policy kit denied action org.libvirt.unix.manage from pid 27509, uid 500, result: 512 I can manually start the kvm guest using virsh, but why can't virt-manager start them? This is on fedora14 x86_64: # rpm

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora >

Will (does) Centos 6 require 512Mb of memory for the GUI install like FC14 or the lower requirement of FC13? My ASUS EE 700 has ~490Mb of memory (vidoe steals some from the 512Mb base) and FC14 switches to text install and does not install any GUI, leaving the boot in test mode. I recall a message earlier that 6 is based off of 14, but not the final Anaconda, thus my question. It would be

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora > R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With > the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and > R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest > versions. And of those

R 2.8.1 is packaged up and queued up for testing. Please test this out: Fedora 9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc9,R-2.8.1-1.fc9 Fedora 10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc10,R-2.8.1-1.fc10 Once you've tested it, please, please, go to the update URL above and click "Add A Comment". If it works for you, click "Works for me" and

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not

Dear useRs, This is to announce that the maintainers of the various distributions have decided to provide "experimental" up-to-date versions of the following R related packages on Debian stable and Ubuntu (i386 and amd64 architectures): littler rkward python-rpy (not on Ubuntu Dapper) python-rpy-doc (not on Ubuntu Dapper) By "experimental" we mostly mean that

Dear useRs, This is to announce that the maintainers of the various distributions have decided to provide "experimental" up-to-date versions of the following R related packages on Debian stable and Ubuntu (i386 and amd64 architectures): littler rkward python-rpy (not on Ubuntu Dapper) python-rpy-doc (not on Ubuntu Dapper) By "experimental" we mostly mean that

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]#

On 6/11/19 12:45 AM, cosml at rsguhr.eu wrote: > Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html > > But the actually question still remains: > Which steps are between 'RedHat published an update' and

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 09:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

Hi, I'm trying to install the newest version of libvirt and libvirt-client from the rpms at ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ on a Fedora 14 machine. The naming of the rpms as "libvirt-0.9.4-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm" suggests that this is exactly the system this was made for, however, installation still does not go smoothly. When I try to install these packages with yum install

I have Samba Version 3.5.8-74.fc13 (Fedora 13) set up as the PDC for an NT domain. I have several Windows XP Pro and Windows 7 Ultimate workstations as domain members and everything is working fine. Domain users can log-in at the workstations, access shares on the Samba server and the other workstations, etc. I am in the process of adding Samba Version 3.5.8-76.fc14 (Fedora 14) as an additional

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >