similar to: R 2.11.0 in Fedora Updates Testing

R 2.11.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). It will likely be the last R update for Fedora 11. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us

R 2.12.1 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in updates-testing for two weeks. You can help us test these packages, and move them forward.

R 2.12.0 is built now for Fedora and EPEL. It is in "updates-testing" (or it will be within the next 24 hours). I did not do this build for Fedora 12, as that release will be End-Of-Life in a month. In accordance with the new policies on Fedora Updates, these new packages will not be pushed as official updates until they either receive positive testing from users, or sit in

I know, I know, you've heard this song before... ;) EL5: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-09c8007e64 EL6: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0a9e4df655 Please go download -8 and test it. It looks good on my end. If it works for you (with CRAN modules), please give positive karma so it will land in updates-stable faster than two weeks. Thanks

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/06/2016 05:04 PM, Brian Fallik wrote: > > Apologies if this email is a top post. I'm not sure how to reply to a > > thread if I'm not subscribed. > > > > We recently encountered the same issue that Evan reported on 6/4 and I > can > > confirm that updated to

Hi Tom, I'm seeing another similar build failure with the recent 3.3.0-5 and I'm a bit stumped about what's going on. On a fresh VM, after installing 3.3.0-5 and then running: install.packages(c("lpSolveAPI), method="curl", repos=" https://cran.rstudio.com") the build fails with: gcc: /builddir/build/BUILD/R-3.3.0/zlib-1.2.8/target/usr/lib64/libz.a: No

R 2.8.1 is packaged up and queued up for testing. Please test this out: Fedora 9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc9,R-2.8.1-1.fc9 Fedora 10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc10,R-2.8.1-1.fc10 Once you've tested it, please, please, go to the update URL above and click "Add A Comment". If it works for you, click "Works for me" and

Hi. Show you how to install oVirt in FC11/FC12? I acted on instructions http://ovirt.et.redhat.com/install-instructions.html, but there were problems with the versions of the module locale (requires 2.0.4 and installed 2.0.5). WBR, Fyodor.

R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. Tom On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the > Fedora >

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 09:58, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit <update> --addbuilds <builds> > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora > R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With > the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and > R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest > versions. And of those

Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora infrastructure is working reliably

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25366 Summary: PGRAPH_ERROR with Quadro NVS 280 SD (NV17 or NV18) Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

On 6/11/19 12:45 AM, cosml at rsguhr.eu wrote: > Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html > > But the actually question still remains: > Which steps are between 'RedHat published an update' and

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote: > > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western > > Europe time zone. > > Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli > interfaces: > >

I am trying to install 64 bit R on Linux. But I got the following error - rpm -i R-core-2.10.0-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm warning: R-core-2.10.0-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 97d3544e error: Failed dependencies: /bin/bash is needed by R-core-2.10.0-2.fc11.x86_64 /bin/sh is needed by R-core-2.10.0-2.fc11.x86_64 /sbin/ldconfig is needed by

Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html But the actually question still remains: Which steps are between 'RedHat published an update' and 'mirror.centos.org'? At Fedora there's 'Bodhi' where Users can

On 6/11/19 2:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 6/11/19 12:45 AM, cosml at rsguhr.eu wrote: >> Okay, some minutes before I post this question - the update was pushed to mirror.centos.org and an announcement was published: >> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2019-June/023321.html >> >> But the actually question still remains: >> Which steps are

On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote: > > On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to > > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now. > > > > Tom > > I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not

Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be