similar to: "untrusted version" warnings

Some packages are available in cran2deb and Debian. After adding cran2deb to my sources.list it seems the cran2deb ones are favored because X.Y-ZcranN is "more recent" than X.Y-Z. In the case of r-cran-rmpi the effect of this was to cause aptitude to want to uninstall all my mpi stuff. Apparently the automatically generated package doesn't have mpi as a dependency. I just put a

Hi, I am curious what will happen to cran2deb: deb http://debian.cran.r-project.org/cran2deb/debian-amd64 testing/ When Squeeze is released? I really hope this service will continue. It has been great being able to aptitude install R packages. Additionally are these packages signed and is there a key? Chris

The cran2deb archives target testing. I just pulled a package from them onto a stable system; the library loaded but said > library(akima) Warning message: package 'akima' was built under R version 2.10.0 Are this and other packages likely to work correctly with different R's (2.7 in the case of stable)? How well are they likely to work with a backported R? The R version would

What is the relation between the cran2deb repository, http://debian.cran.r-project.org/, and the debian repositories at CRAN, http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian/? I've studied the pages and this list, but am unsure I've got it right. My understanding is that cran2deb had almost all packages, targets testing, and currently is only supported for i386. It appears the debian repo at

hi: at RHEL 7.4 we had used "map untrusted to domain = yes". so users can login with "username" instead of "sam-dom\username". after upgrade to RHEL 7.5, samba version upgrade from 4.6 to 4.7. now "map untrusted to domain = yes" or "map untrusted to domain = auto" are not working. can we still let user to use "usename" instead

Hi I have a question/problem about winbind and the "map untrusted to domain" (=yes) parameter. I use samba 3.6.0 on FreeBSD 8.2 with the following configuration: [global] encrypt passwords = yes map untrusted to domain = yes allow trusted domains = yes client ntlmv2 auth = yes client use spnego = yes client lanman auth = yes client plaintext auth = no winbind enum

Dear Michael, I was looking up the status of the cran2deb effort and notice that you now have a PPA where new packages are landing and being built for Ubuntu. It looks like this is still a work in progress, but is already a fantastic resource for me and I hope it is something that you can continue to operate. I'm now installing many of these packages but some things I need are missing.

2018-06-29 15:12 GMT+08:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:56:33 +0800 > d tbsky via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> hi: >> >> at RHEL 7.4 we had used "map untrusted to domain = yes". so users >> can login with "username" instead of "sam-dom\username". >>

In bash, given a string assignment as follows, how do I "add slashes" automagically, so that it can be safely passed to another program? Notice that the assignment contains spaces, single-quotes and double-quotes, maybe god-only-knows-what-else. It's untrusted data. Yet I need to pass it all *safely*. The appropriate function in PHP is addslashes(); but what is the bash

----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:29:59 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Cannot authenticate as guest to domain-joined Samba 4.7.0 fileserver when map untrusted to domain = > auto > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:53:41 -0500 (CDT) > Andrew Martin

----- Original Message ----- > From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:54:17 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Cannot authenticate as guest to domain-joined Samba 4.7.0 fileserver when map untrusted to domain = > auto > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:47:57 -0500 (CDT) > Andrew Martin

Announcing cran2deb: 1700+ Debian packages from almost all of CRAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Last Friday's presentation at UseR! 2009 was the first really public mention of 'cran2deb'. It provides Debian packages of all of CRAN. It started as Charles' project from last year's Google Summer of Code, was further extended by us over the

Hello, I just upgraded Samba on a fileserver from 4.6.8 to 4.7.0; this fileserver is joined to a Samba4 AD Domain. I have configured the following options to allow guest access to a share: [global] guest account = nobody map to guest = Bad User [Share] guest ok = yes When attempting to connect from a local account on a Windows 7 client (the client is joined to the domain but the

How can I get ssh to use "untrusted" cookies (see xauth(1), X11-SECURITY-Extension) with forwarded X clients? Cheers. Aurelio.

Hello everyone, Samba 3.6.9 on CentOS 6.4. With "security = ads", winbind doesn't authenticate requests that prepend a not-existent domain to the username. Users that have logged into the domain authenticate transparently to squid with NTLM (format is domain\username), but not users that are logged in locally or into another domain with the same username and password (format is

I am having this problem on Ubuntu 18.04 -- I manage a batch of desktop machines with some convience desktop launchers, which gnome3 insists are "untrusted". With some general websearching reveals that this is a *GNome3* so-called "security" issue (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/commit/1630f5348). I found a thread on the CentOS Forums (I don't have an account

We have a windows domain "AD" and a samba domain "SAD" running Samba 4.9 in AD-mode. We also have an old NT4 domain called "Samba" running Samba 3.6 + OpenLDAP. We have the same users and passwords in all three. The user objects in the "SAD"-domain have the same uidNumber as in the "Samba"-domain. Workstations and users log on to the windows

Hi all, I need to write an aptitude provider for Debian. How should it differ from apt? Can I just s/apt/aptitude/g, or do I need to do something else? Any other weird behaviours I should look for or whatever? I''ll make it a subclass of apt (and since Deb seems to specify aptitude as the default now, maybe apt should subclass aptitude), so any dpkg answerfile work should work on

What with the impending release and a now fixed bug nagging me, I''m testing puppet [2556] from subversion. There have been changes in packages, I used to have Package { provider => "aptitude", } in my default.pp, but that doesn''t work anymore, and changing package to type or removing the declaration doesn''t help. How do package providers work now?

summary: updating R .deb's from recommended mirrors @ http://cran.r-project.org/mirrors.html has allowed me to keep my R version up-to-date for many months. But since Friday (25 Jan) I get errors like Failed to fetch <mirror URI/>/squeeze-cran/<deb name/>: Hash Sum mismatch but can install .deb's from non-CRAN sources. No fix from sudo rm /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin sudo