similar to: why no libRblas.so in ubuntu packages on CRAN?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "why no libRblas.so in ubuntu packages on CRAN?"

2018 Sep 23
1
libRblas.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Thanks Dirk.? That is what I thought, and sessionInfo() returns: Matrix products: default BLAS: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/atlas/libblas.so.3.10.3 LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/atlas/liblapack.so.3.10.3 locale: ?[1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8?????? LC_NUMERIC=C ?[3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8??????? LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 ?[5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8??? LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 ?[7]
2010 Dec 16
1
'libRblas.so' missing in R 2.12.1
Dear R developers, I just compiled the latest version of R (2.12.1) and noticed that 'libRblas.so' is missing in the '/x86_64/src/extra/blas' subdirectory of my R-installation. Did I miss ongoing discussions on the Mailinglist about this or might it be a local problem? Thanks for this brilliant software. Best Christian -- Christian Kohler Institute of Functional Genomics ~
2018 Sep 22
4
libRblas.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
R 3.5.1 is installed under Linux Mint 19 from binaries r-base and r-base-dev from ubuntu bionic-cran35.? Mysteriously, packages using libRblas cannot be compiled.? I get: libRblas.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory.? And indeed, I find no libRblas.so. Any ideas about how to fix this? Thanks, Steve
2010 Nov 20
1
R-.12.0 atlas lapack
Greetings, I last built R-2.11.1 a few months ago. The computer was equipped with these:- ---cpu amd64 2 cores ---o/s cblfs 64-bit only linux kernel-2.6.32 gcc-4.4.2 jdk(1.5)-6U20? ---bls atlas3.9.26 lapacck-3.2.1 I obtained an installed directory of ~58Mbytes and in the ~/lib directory was libR.so (~7.8Mbytes in size) as well as libRblas.so and libRlapack.so (~2.9Mbytes). I have
2010 Jun 07
1
Compiling R-2.11.1 patched on Ubuntu 10.04 with Optimized GotoBLAS2 libraries
I've attempted to use the optimized GotoBLAS2 library with a freshly compiled R-2.11.1 patched on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.4. (See details below). When I run this version of R, the timings are not different than the original install, and only one core is used in test computations. Can someone point out my error? Thanks. --Dale Details ... I'm running the 64-bit version of Ubuntu 10.04 on my 2
2019 May 08
4
openblas
Hello, macosx 10.13.6, Rdevel r76458 I'm trying to compile against openblas to reproduce an error on the CRAN check page (my package is clean under winbuilder and all but one of the checks). I've downloaded and installed openblas 0.3.7 but I am not 100% sure that it is being used by R. Using ./configure --with-blas="-lopenblas" Then running R to discover the PID I get:
2009 Jun 26
1
problems compiling for RHEL 5.3 x86_64
Well, CentOS 5.3, which amounts to the same thing. I recently decided to upgrade my main research machine from Fedora Core 8 -> CentOS 5.3. Basically, I was looking to move to a distro with longer 'term-of-life' than the release schedule for Fedora currently allows. The machine is a multi-Opteron box, so both 32- and 64-bit apps natively supported. Since I do a lot of 'linear
2009 Jun 26
1
can't use ATLAS or ACML | 2.9.0
So, tried again from scratch. Again, CentOS 5.3, which is essentially RHEL 5.3. ./configure --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" In config.log, get things like configure:37199: checking for dgemm_ in -L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml configure:37230: gcc -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib64 conftest.c
2008 Jul 03
1
--enable-BLAS-shlib conflict with --with-lapack in configure?
Dear developeRs, I'm trying to build R (2.7.1, on an x86_64 running Linux, but I believe I have observed this on x86 and with earlier versions of R as well) using external BLAS and LAPACK libraries _and_ generating libR.so, libRblas.so and libRlapack.so. Without --enable-BLAS-shlib, configure is able to find and use the external LAPACK library: ./configure \
2014 May 22
1
R 3.1 breaks RStudio in Fedora 20?
Hi All I just installed R 3.1 on fedora 20 after removing rstudio # rpm -q R R-3.1.0-5.fc20.x86_64 after I removed rstudio (I don't use it that much but need it for teaching) I tried to reinstall rstudio but its missing libRblas.so and libRlapack.so dependencies I'm guessed it would be OK to force it because lapack-devel and blas-devel are installed so I tried # rpm -ivh --no-deps
2012 Feb 10
1
Out of date instructions to build R using MKL
Hi! I've been playing with MKL for a few days and I noticed the instructions in the R Installation Administration manual [1] no longer apply. It seems that since version 10.0 (the one used by the manual), libmkl_lapack.so has been renamed/split (although the official explanations seem to imply this was already the case in 10.0 [2]). As a consequence, the instructions for dynamic linking no
2010 May 28
2
Compiling R-2.11.0 with ATLAS-tuned BLAS and LAPACK
Hello. I am a Linux neophyte and know almost nothing ?about compiling, so I would appreciate any help and advice y'all would care to offer. I am trying to compile the 64 bit version of R using a tuned ATLAS and LAPACK (ATLAS 3.9.24). I am running Ubunto 10.04 LTS (through wubi, FWIW). The ATLAS and LAPACK files (atlas.so, f77blas.so, lapack.so, and cblas.so) are sitting in the folder
2010 Oct 31
3
BLAS benchmarks on R 2.12.0
Hi, I saw on the mailing list and in the NEWS file that some unsafe math transformations were disabled for the reference BLAS implementation that is used in R. We have a set of performance tests for the OpenMx library, and some of the tests have a x3-10 slowdown in R 2.12.0 versus 2.11.1. When I copy the shared library libRblas.0.dylib from the 2.11.1 installation into the 2.12.0 installation,
2002 Nov 29
3
BLAS/Lapack for OS X
OS X 10.2 and higher comes standard with highly optimized versions of BLAS and Lapack in /Systems/Library/Frameworks/vecLib.framework. It seems that even for double precision they do much better. See http://sthmac.magnet.fsu.edu/benchmarks/ I am not sure how these numbers would look on G3 Macs, but obviously for double precision there is not much reliance on Altivec. So I tried to configure
2005 Aug 29
1
BLAS and ATLAS
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:48:23AM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, G?ran Brostr?m wrote: > >LAPACK/BLAS routines call xerbla "if an input parameter has an > >invalid value" (exact quote from XERBLA at Netlib). Other types of errors > >are not printed (by xerbla), but it is up to the user to check the return > >value of the argument
2018 Sep 22
0
libRblas.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
On 22 September 2018 at 16:08, Steve Gutreuter wrote: | R 3.5.1 is installed under Linux Mint 19 from binaries r-base and | r-base-dev from ubuntu bionic-cran35.? Mysteriously, packages using | libRblas cannot be compiled.? I get: libRblas.so: cannot open shared | object file: No such file or directory.? And indeed, I find no libRblas.so. | | Any ideas about how to fix this? What does
2010 Jul 12
2
R-2.11.1 build and 'so' libraries withouth the 'lib' prefix
Greetings, I have a computer with the following setup: 1)cblfs (pure 64-bit (amd64) linux), kernel2.6.34 gcc4.4.2 2)R-2.11.1 I compiled R with BLAS and lapack using the switched ( --with-blas="- lpthread -latlas -lfptf77blas" --with-lapack="-llapack -lcblas" ). (( http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Linear-algebra) ) Prior to compiling R-2.11.1 sh
2011 Feb 26
2
GotoBLAS2 breaks lapack
Hi, I'm relatively new to R on Ubuntu (moving from Windows), and I'm trying to get GotoBLAS2 working. I installed (from a CRAN mirror) the pre-built binaries of R (which, as far as I know, is compiled as a shared library) on Ubuntu 10.10 using apt-get install r-base r-base-dev I successfully built GotoBLAS2 from source, copied the library to /usr/lib and created s symbolic link from
2015 Sep 30
1
Build R with MKL and ICC
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Nathan Kurz <nate at verse.com> wrote: > Hi Arnaud -- > > I'm glad it's working for you. I'm not sure I understand your final > answer. Are you saying that the version I posted worked for you as > given, or that you had to remove some of the other options? I say it works perfectly when using the single dynamic library (lmkl_rt):
2018 May 10
2
readLines() behaves differently for gzfile connection
When I read a .gz file with readLines() in 3.4.3, it returns text (and a warning). In 3.5.0, it gives a warning, but no text. Is this expected behavior or a bug? 3.4.3: > source_file = "1k_annotation.gz" > readfile_con <- gzfile(source_file, "r") > readLines(readfile_con, n = 5) [1] "#chr\tpos\tref\talt\t <truncated output here> Warning message: In