similar to: optimized linear algebra library on Lenny

Emmanuel, On 30 August 2008 at 00:04, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: | Dear list, | | Setup : Ubuntu Hardy + updates + backports + security + R repository on | a 3.2 GHz PIV dual-core processor. | | Bitten (again...) by the "I'll optimize my setup" bug, I tried to test | atlas. Following Dirk's advice on a not-so-recent post to R-help, I | tried "apt-get install -s

Hi, Since upgrading to version 2.11.0~20100402-1, starting R fails with: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: libblas.so.3gf: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Is this occurring to others on sid? -- Seb

I feel like Marlon Brando in "On the Waterfront" where he's told "It's not your night, kid", except for me it has been the last two months trying to debug memory problems. Now I can't even install an old version of this package on a netbook running the Ubuntu 10.10 netbook remix because it can't find the libraries libf77blas and libatlas. I have even gone to

On 15 March 2012 14:09, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek@r-project.org> wrote: > I thought I'll post this here since I could not find an answer anywhere I > searched: how to setup R with threaded BLAS on Debian/Ubuntu. > > First, neither Debian nor Ubuntu come with optimized ATLAS binaries, > simply because by definition they need to be optimized for a particular >

Dear All, As suggested in the reply from Dirk Eddelbuettel to my post to R-dev I am reposting here as the problem still persists. Please see my post to R-dev under same heading for additional description if needed. In summary I am starting from a new installation of Ubuntu 10.10 as the single operating system on a reformatted disk with just the OS, ESS and emacs installed before installing R

I looked for evidence that this is supposed to happen, as it was news to me that it did on some versions of R. Possible sources of documentation seem to be R CMD INSTALL --help ?INSTALL R-intro.texi, R-exts.texi, R-admin.texi none of which mention this AFAICS, and all seem to be written assuming an existing library tree. DId you find something to suggest otherwise? Clearly no alpha/beta

Hi All, I'm still having significantly difficulty getting the quantreg library running in R. I'm running R on MEPIS using the debs created by Dirk Eddelbuettel and placed in apt testing. When I try to install quantreg using the install.packages() function it fails with: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lblas-3 Dirk was nice enough to send me a .deb for quantreg which installs without

Hi All, I'm trying to install the quantreg library on my MEPIS box (debian-based linux). When I try >install.packages("quantreg") it fails to loads and errors with: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lblas-3. I tried installing a ton of packages to fix the missing part but the only thing I manage to do it cause problems with another shared library and had to re-install a couple of

Hi All, I'm trying to install the quantreg library on my MEPIS box (debian-based linux). When I try >install.packages("quantreg") it fails to loads and errors with: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lblas-3. I tried installing a ton of packages to fix the missing part but the only thing I manage to do it cause problems with another shared library and had to re-install a couple of

Hi, I'm using Ubuntu Hardy i386, and the R 2.7.1 Ubuntu packages from CRAN. The CRAN r-base-dev package depends on refblas3-dev or atlas3-base-dev, but octave3.0-headers depends on libblas-dev. The two blas packages seem to conflict, so r-base-dev and octave3.0-headers can't be installed together. Is this a known issue? Thanks, Gad $ sudo apt-get install octave3.0-headers Reading

On two laptops running 32-bit kubuntu, I have found that svd(), invoked within R 2.9.1 as supplied with the current ubuntu package, returns very incorrect results when presented with complex-valued input. One of the laptops is a Dell D620, the other a MacBook Pro. I've also verified the problem on a 32-bit desktop. On these same systems, R compiled from source provides apparently

Hello, This simple SVD calculation (commands are copied immediately below) crashes on my Ubuntu machine (R 2.13.0). However it worked fine with R.12 and Ubuntu 10.04, and it also works fine on my Windows 7 machine with R 2.13, so I suspect there's a problem with (my?) Ubuntu and / or R. I'm using the R distribution that is accessible with Ubuntu's repositories manager, I am not

Dear list, I am sorry to bother you with this. I just upgraded yesterday to R 2.0.0 (using apt-get under Debian Sid), and now have problems running e.g., summary(lm(...)) the lm is calculated, but the summary statement gives me the following error: Error in La.chol2inv(x, size) : lapack routines cannot be loaded In addition: Warning message: unable to load shared library

I have R under Linux Kubuntu Hardy Heron 8.04 LTS. I am trying to install package 'lme4' and get the following error: ---- * installing *source* package ?lme4? ... ** libs gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -I/usr/share/R/include -I"/usr/lib/R/library/Matrix/include" -I"/usr/lib/R/library/stats/include" -fpic -g -O2 -c init.c -o init.o gcc -std=gnu99

Dear all, I am estimating a mixed-model in Ubuntu Raring (13.04¸ amd64), with the code: fm0 <- lme(rt ~ run + group * stim * cond, random=list( subj=pdSymm(~ 1 + run), subj=pdSymm(~ 0 + stim)), data=mydat1) When I check the approximate variance-covariance matrix, I get: > fm0$apVar [1] "Non-positive definite

Dear All, Summary: ======== To test some packages, I want to build R-3.1.0 (current R devel). However, when I use the default libblas, make check fails with running code in 'reg-BLAS.R' ...make[3]: *** [reg-BLAS.Rout] Error 1 It does not fail, however, if I use libatlas3 or libopenblas. The same thing happens with the current R patched. I've google around and cannot find

food now? or after work in the library? On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:00 +0200, r-sig-debian-request at r-project.org wrote: > Send R-SIG-Debian mailing list submissions to > r-sig-debian at r-project.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-debian > or, via email, send a message with subject or body

make check of R-alpha_2006-04-08_r37675 fails on Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 running on an Intel P4 computer. > version _ platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system i686, linux-gnu status

Has anyone succeeded in getting a parallel BLAS, such as Goto's BLAS, installed on a machine running Ubuntu 11.10? I currently have the libatlas3gf-base package installed on a machine with an AMD Athlon X4 processor. I tried to install the libopenblas-base and libopenblas-dev packages but there seemed to be a glich related to having both libopenblas and libatlas3gf installed so that when I

dear debian-R group: I am using the stock ubuntu binary R 3.0.1 for ubuntu raring but on cinnamon mint olivia 15. I read dirk's gcbd paper from a couple of years ago. it suggests that stock blas is pretty bad compared to the four main alternatives. of course, dirk also maintains the binaries for debian/ubuntu R, so he probably knows the answer off hand. I installed libatlas3-base