Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Ubuntu package for 2.5.1"
2005 Mar 25
4
Gmail invitation
Hello R users!
I just found out that I have 49 invitations for Gmail (gmail.google.com).
I have been using it now for a while and is really nice. Don't forget
1 GB for free.
I will invite those who respond to this mail by FIFO.
--
Lep pozdrav / With regards,
Gregor Gorjanc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
University of Ljubljana
Biotechnical
2006 Jul 02
4
Test for argument in ...
Hello!
Say I have a function foo1, which has argument ... to pass various
arguments to foo2 i.e.
foo1 <- function(x, ...)
{
foo2(x, ...)
}
Say that foo2 accepts argument arg1 and I would like to do the following:
- if foo1 is called as foo1(x) then I would like to assign some value to
arg1 inside foo1 before calling foo2
arg1 <- "some value"
foo2(x, arg1=arg1)
- if foo1 is
2005 Feb 22
6
Run Sweave and LaTeX directly from command line
Hello!
Those of you, who use Sweave a lot, will probably find my shell script
usable. You can get it at:
http://www.bfro.uni-lj.si/MR/ggorjan/programs/shell/Sweave.sh
No warranty, however don't hesitate to contact me if you find an error or
have a patch!
--
Lep pozdrav / With regards,
Gregor GORJANC
---------------------------------------------------------------
University of
2005 Mar 27
3
F90
Hello!
Has anyone successfully compiled F90 sources in R-package? I found the
same question on r-devel list from 2002 and I wonder if there is any
progress. I heard that g95 and gfortran can be usable.
And one more thing. I have a program written in F90 and lets suppose that
compiler is not a problem. I've read manual 'Writing R Extensions' and
successfully loaded one F77 subroutine
2005 Mar 27
3
F90
Hello!
Has anyone successfully compiled F90 sources in R-package? I found the
same question on r-devel list from 2002 and I wonder if there is any
progress. I heard that g95 and gfortran can be usable.
And one more thing. I have a program written in F90 and lets suppose that
compiler is not a problem. I've read manual 'Writing R Extensions' and
successfully loaded one F77 subroutine
2005 Apr 24
4
Upgrading R
Hello!
New version of R has came out and I would like to thank to all developers
on this matter. So I should probably upgrade. Fine and no problem. For
windows I just grab the latest precompiled binnaries and install them. Then
I see a report on a bug, which is or will be fixed in pacthed version. So
I need to get binnaries from patched build and install them, right?
How often do you people
2005 Apr 24
4
Upgrading R
Hello!
New version of R has came out and I would like to thank to all developers
on this matter. So I should probably upgrade. Fine and no problem. For
windows I just grab the latest precompiled binnaries and install them. Then
I see a report on a bug, which is or will be fixed in pacthed version. So
I need to get binnaries from patched build and install them, right?
How often do you people
2005 Jun 08
6
Random seed problem in MCMC coupling of chains
Hello!
I am performing coupling of chains in MCMC and I need the same value
of seed for two chains. I will show demo of what I want:
R code, which might show my example is:
niter <- 3
nchain <- 2
tmpSeed <- 123
for (i in 1:niter) { # iterations
for (j in 1:nchain) { # chains
set.seed(tmpSeed)
a <- runif(1)
cat("iter:", i, "chain:", j,
2005 Feb 23
4
Sweave and \input or \include LaTeX commands
Hello!
I was just wondering if Sweave can work with \input or \include
LaTeX commands. So, is it aware of such a possible hierarchy in
documents. I would test that, but I don't have such a report
available at the moment.
I thought of that when I was writting shell script for Sweave
from command line and I have solved that part there.
--
Lep pozdrav / With regards,
Gregor GORJANC
2005 May 08
2
Extract just some fields from XML
Hello!
I am trying to get specific fields from an XML document and I am totally
puzzled. I hope someone can help me.
# URL
URL<-"http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=11877539,11822933,11871444&retmode=xml&rettype=citation"
# download a XML file
tmp <- xmlTreeParse(URL, isURL = TRUE)
tmp <- xmlRoot(tmp)
Now I want to extract only
2007 Dec 06
3
Warnings
Hi
I get the following warings on my ubuntu (gutsy) machine
> library(matrix)
> data.frame(x=1:5, z=5)[1:5, ]
x z
1 1 5
2 2 5
3 3 5
4 4 5
5 5 5
Warning message:
':::' is deprecated.
'methods' is deprecated.
'seemsS4Object' is deprecated.
Use 'isS4' instead.
See help("Deprecated")
It is quite annoying since I often subset the data.frames. Will
2006 Feb 10
8
Fitdistr and MLE for parameter lambda of Poisson distribution
Hello!
I would like to get MLE for parameter lambda of Poisson distribution. I
can use fitdistr() for this. After looking a bit into the code of this
function I can see that value for lambda and its standard error is
estimated via
estimate <- mean(x)
sds <- sqrt(estimate/n)
Is this MLE? With my poor math/stat knowledge I thought that MLE for
Poisson parameter is (in mixture of LaTeX
2005 Mar 11
2
Package Installation in RGui (PR#7262)
In reference to the thread
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/04/10/0859.html
I have the same problem updating packages with newly-installed version of
released version of R 2.0.1. Previous posts refer to a bug in windows. I
wonder if there is a work-around? This probably should go to R-help but it
follows on from the post in R-devel. Apologies in advance.
OS: Windows XP Professional,
2006 Apr 29
3
Making R talk to Win/OpenBUGS in Linux (again)
I'm back!
I've just learned that, on a fully updated Fedora Core Linux5 sytem,
the working solution to access Winbugs under wine via the R package
"rbugs" no longer works. Here was my last post on this topic (with
the formerly working solution) from January.
http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/68497.html
Currently, what happens is that WinBUGS starts up, but just
2006 Aug 01
1
Global setting for na.rm=TRUE
Hello!
Is it possible to set na.rm=TRUE in a global way? I'am constantly
forgeting on this when performing analyses. I agree that one should
be carefull with this when developing some code, but not necesarilly
so in data analysis.
Lep pozdrav / With regards,
Gregor Gorjanc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
University of Ljubljana PhD student
2007 May 23
1
(PR#9691) 'Bug'#424696: R CMD INSTALL -l <path> does not
I looked for evidence that this is supposed to happen, as it was news to
me that it did on some versions of R. Possible sources of documentation
seem to be
R CMD INSTALL --help
?INSTALL
R-intro.texi, R-exts.texi, R-admin.texi
none of which mention this AFAICS, and all seem to be written assuming an
existing library tree.
DId you find something to suggest otherwise? Clearly no alpha/beta
2006 Aug 07
2
Constrain coefs. in linear model to sum to 0
Hello!
I would like to use constrain to sum coeficients of a factor to 0 instead
of classical corner contraint i.e. I would like to fit a model like
lm(y ~ 1 + effectA + effectB)
and say get parameters
intercept
effectA_1
effectA_2
effectB_1
effectB_2
effectB_3
where effectA_1 represents deviation of level A_1 from intercept and
sum(effectA_1, effectA_2) = 0 and the same for factor B.
Is
2006 Mar 20
2
levels for list and data.frame
Hello!
Does R core find the following pacth usefull - I created methods for
levels for list and data.frame, which can be usefull to get a list of
levels for entries in a list or columns in a data.frame. Patch is
attached and shown bellow example
# Example
> tmp <- list()
> tmp$a <- factor(letters[1:10])
> tmp$b <- factor(letters[5:14])
> tmp$c <- 1:10
> tmp1 <-
2006 Mar 17
3
Collapsing levels of a factor
> x <- factor(1:3, labels = c("b" , "f", "minus"))
> x
[1] b f minus
Levels: b f minus
I want to change all "minus" to "b". I know that the simplest way to do this is
> levels(x) <- c("b", "f", "b")
and also that
> x[x == "minus"] <- "b"
> x <- factor(x)
2006 Mar 17
3
Collapsing levels of a factor
> x <- factor(1:3, labels = c("b" , "f", "minus"))
> x
[1] b f minus
Levels: b f minus
I want to change all "minus" to "b". I know that the simplest way to do this is
> levels(x) <- c("b", "f", "b")
and also that
> x[x == "minus"] <- "b"
> x <- factor(x)