similar to: R 2.4 needed for packages in testing _now_?

Hi All, I hate to do this (because I always found the R/Debian combo exceptional and I never had the time to ontribute --sorry about that--), BUT, the latest r-cran-vr for Etch (testing) is dpkg -l | grep r-cran-vr ii r-cran-vr 7.2.29-1 GNU R package accompanying the Venables and Ripley book on S and I get the following error if I try to load MASS

Hi, I have R 2.3.1 installed by debian p?ckage. I install only the base and recommended R packages from Debian source, all others packages I install from the R source at CRAN. But, I try to use library MASS, but I received this message: > library(MASS) Error: This is R 2.3.1, package 'MASS' needs >= 2.4.0 What is the problem? Inte Ronaldo -- "It ain't over until

Hi, This is probably way far unsupported, but here goes: I had been running ext3 0.0.3b for a while and found that I wanted to convert back to ext2 so I could still play with 2.4test kernels. Here is what I did: 1) boot the machine with kernel args init=/bin/bash 2) run debugfs on the root partition to remove the have_journal ext2 feature flag. 3) remount the root filesystem rw as ext2

Hi, I'm trying to do a non-metric multidimensional scaling using isoMDS. However, I have some '0' distances in my data, and I'm not sure how to deal with them. I'd rather not drop rows from the original data, as I am comparing several datasets (morphology and molecular data) for the same individuals, and it's interesting to see how much morphological variation can be

Thanks, that did it! Are there any plans to enable the loop vectorizer by default? From: Nadav Rotem [mailto:nrotem at apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 13:33 PM To: Nowicki, Tyler Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: Packed instructions generaetd by LoopVectorize? Hi Tyler, Try adding -ffast-math. We can only vectorize reduction variables if it is safe to reorder floating

Hello, I am a relatively new user of R. I have written a basic function to calculate the Gower similarity function. I was motivated to do so partly as an excercise in learning R, and partly because the existing option (vegdist in the vegan package) does not accept missing values. I think I have succeeded - my function gives me the correct values. However, now that I'm starting to use it with

Hi Tyler, Try adding -ffast-math. We can only vectorize reduction variables if it is safe to reorder floating point operations. Thanks, Nadav On Apr 3, 2013, at 10:29 AM, "Nowicki, Tyler" <tyler.nowicki at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about LoopVectorize. I wrote a simple test case, a dot product loop and found that packed instructions are

Hi, I'm having some problems installing packages from the source files on Windows, using R CMD INSTALL pkg. I'm running WindowsXP, and I've followed the instructions as per the README.packages file from the R installation. I ran into a hitch, with the install failing following a "hhc: not found" warning. I figured out that this was related to the html help workshop.

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > You can change the input LLVM-IR. > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:16 AM, "Nowicki, Tyler" <tyler.nowicki at intel.com> > wrote: > > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > I am interested in evaluating the performance of packed vs scalar > double-precision floating point instructions on

Hi, I've just about got myself transferred from windowsXP to Linux (Mepis 3.3.1-1). I've got R 2.1.1, emacs, and ess running from the debian repositories. Of course, there is a hitch. I have a bit of C code in one of my personal functions. I have, apparently without problem, been able to compile it using R CMD SHLIB, but when I try to dyn.load it I get the following error: >

I understand, but this sounds like legalization. Does every architecture trigger an overflow exception, as opposed to setting a bit? Perhaps it makes more sense to do this in the backends that trigger an overflow exception? I'm working on a modification for DIV right now in the x86 backend for Intel Atom that will improve performance, however because the *actual* operation has been replaced

Hi again, I've just uninstalled R2.01 and installed the new R2.10 on my WindowsXP machine. I then attempted to install the vegan package from source files, as I learned to do last week, with the help of some of you. I have updated my path variable to the new R directory (R/rw2010/bin instead of R/rw2001pat/bin), and I've still got the HTMLHelpWorkshop files installed, as well as Perl

So if I first create the value in an entry BB and then build a CopyToReg but then I have to read it in a BB that loops back to itself, with it's own CopyToReg at the end, then I have two CopyToReg nodes for the same value. In this case, I need to create 3 virt regs, 1 for each CopyToReg and a third for the CopyFromReg in the beginning of the loop BB, right? And then I need to build a PHI

Dovecot experts, We just recently deployed Dovecot 1.0.rc15 on a Redhat 5 system. I have over 1400 users. At first it appeared to work fine. But soon, we had complaints of students that couldn't retrieve their email. I looked in the logs and found this error. Jan 7 22:27:31 stu dovecot: auth(default): pam(pucklisl,<http://144.89.40.6>144.89.40.6): pipe() failed: Too many

Thanks for the reply, they were very helpful. Is it enough to prevent BBVectorize from packing together double precision instructions? If a non-clang frontend is used, such as ISPC, is it possible that the IR may contain packed double instruction? Tyler From: Cameron McInally [mailto:cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:39 PM To: Nowicki, Tyler Cc: Nadav Rotem; LLVM

Alexander, These are the only two CVEs from 2016 that I found contained in the RPM that you referenced. - add security fix for CVE-2016-5387 - mod_ssl: add security fix for CVE-2016-4979 -- Tyler Waldo Information Security Associate Threat and Vulnerability Management Mobile: (650) 410-0776 On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Am

Hello, I would like to see if this issue is a result of a misunderstanding on my part before I file a bug. I am using LLVM 3.4, built from the source tarballs. My system's uname is "Darwin tyler-air 12.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 12.5.0: Sun Sep 29 13:33:47 PDT 2013; root:xnu-2050.48.12~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64". All I'm trying to do is add a runtime check after all call

You can change the input LLVM-IR. On Feb 21, 2013, at 7:16 AM, "Nowicki, Tyler" <tyler.nowicki at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am interested in evaluating the performance of packed vs scalar double-precision floating point instructions on x86-atom and I was wondering if anyone knows more precisely where to modify llvm to use one or the other. I know I probably need

Samba Ldap experts, I am trying to recompile samba to support ldap. After compiling samba with --with-ldapsam, I had no errors with configure or compilation. However, after starting up smbd and nmbd, I get these errors in the log.smbd file when I try to connect to the server: [2004/12/20 13:57:02, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(590) Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/smbd.log: No

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Nowicki, Tyler <tyler.nowicki at intel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I noticed that when dividing with signed 8-bit values the IR uses a 32-bit > signed divide, however, when unsigned 8-bit values are used the IR uses an > 8-bit unsigned divide. Why not use a 8-bit signed divide when using 8-bit > signed values? "sdiv i8 -128,