similar to: setfacl <dir>:operation not supported

Dear gluster team, I have installed glusterfs on my servers for the storage. Machine: x86_64-redhat-linux I have created volumes with rdma protocol for infiniband. I have mount with acl option on server and client. When I run setfacl for glusterfs mount point it works fine but when i do it for nfs mount it says. setfacl <dir> : operation not supported. The logs created in server are as

I've run into a problem with Gluster stability with the RDMA transport. Below is a description of the environment, a simple script that can replicate the problem, and log files from my test system. I can work around the problem by using the TCP transport over IPoIB but would like some input onto what may be making the RDMA transport fail in this case. ===== Symptoms ===== - Error from test

Hello, I am using - glusterfs 3.2.2 - stripe mode - rdma I am trying to run one data intensive application and the application IO is done with glusterfs. But application throws error code 30 for IO , and on server side in /var/log/gluterfs/nfs.log the following error found: [2011-11-09 14:59:21.251450] E [iobuf.c:526:iobuf_ref]

we are running OCFS on 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp ocfs-2.4.21-EL-smp-1.0.12-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 I have been deleting datafiles, more than 3 times successfully for rman duplication, from a mount point /data1 (total 191G). Last week when I tried to delete datafiles from the same directory, it did delete datafiles but did not release (reclaim) all space. It still showed that 20G of

Hi, Gene Cumm wrote: > > 3) It feels like this is a moving target where gcc keeps changing and > > different results get reported. Do we have indications that different versions of gcc5 cause different behavior on the same build and boot machines ? Ady wrote: > Since the issue is only present on specific > hardware / firmware, whatever might seem to "solve" the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8666 Summary: --debug=all9 fail Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au QAContact: rsync-qa at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11683 Bug ID: 11683 Summary: hang on select when send many files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: tom916 at

I'm having two problems. The first is that when running with --files-from and -ii unmodified files are not put in the log. --out-format=%-14b %C %-14l %i %B %M %f All that appears in the log is Number of files: 0 Number of created files: 0 Number of regular files transferred: 0 Total file size: 0 bytes Total transferred file size: 0 bytes Literal data: 0 bytes Matched data: 0 bytes File list

Hi Wayne, Trying out 3.1 pre 1 on OSX 10.8.4 I like the new extended stats and the ir-chunk file numbers in log. Also getting a lot of errors and most copies not completing to local disk. rsync just stalls. Standard osx build: patch -p1 <patches/fileflags.diff patch -p1 <patches/crtimes.diff patch -p1 <patches/hfs-compression.diff ./configure make rsync --fileflags --force-change

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > As far as I can see (... well, guess), lpxelinux.0 uses the TCP > implementation under core/lwip/, which doesn't support TCP timestamps. > > Whereas syslinux.efi apparently uses the embedded gpxe/ tree, and that > one uses TCP timestamps. See tcp_xmit() in gpxe/src/net/tcp.c: > > if ( ( flags & TCP_SYN ) || tcp->timestamps

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7124 Summary: Error exit causes I/O error Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: matt at mattmccutchen.net

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 Summary: resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-samba at

On 04/07/15 19:22, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to find out how to pxe boot with syslinux.efi on QEMU with > OVMF. After getting through the initial hurdle caused by the iPXE based > option ROM included with QEMU having a problem as described in these > threads: > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-November/022804.html >

Hello, I found a new issue with glusterfs 3.2.1 - im getting a glusterfs process for each mountpoint and they are consuming all of the CPU time. strace won't show a thing - so no system calls are made Mounting the same volumes on another server works fine. Has anyone seen such a thing? Oder any idea, what causes this and how to fix it? The logfiles don't show any information about

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109 Bug ID: 13109 Summary: rsync hangs during transfer of many small files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

Author: marks Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 49eca6287e6a581e3e46ada9d34a54b7665027b1 Log message: 6434606 getfacl/setfacl of files/dirs over NFSv4 with ZFS underneath fail Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/fs_subr.c

Hello, I am using red hat 2.4.20-8 with samba 2.2.7a. i have to enable acl with samba.whether acl is enabled bydefault in samba if not,then how we have to do ???? thankyou _________________________________________________________________ New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more. http://windows.microsoft.com/shop

Hi I'm currently using Samba 3.0.4 with LDAP as a PDC. The PDC is in a trusted relationship (both ways) with a Windows NT4 server. I tried updating to 3.0.7 a short while back but had problems using 'setfacl' to set permissions for users on the trusted domain - i.e. > setfacl -m u:remote-dom+jbloggs:r-x . setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 3 Setting

Dear all, I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? [root at s1 abc]# getfacl /abc # file: abc # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:user01:--- user:user02:--- user:user03:--- ... user:user25:--- group::r-x mask::r-x other::r-x

On 20.03.2015 02:14, muiz wrote: > Dear all, > > > I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control. > There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem? use xargs like in: |find . -name "*.pdf" -print0 | xargs -0 RUNACOMMAND robert | > > > [root at s1