similar to: Xen EOF?

Hi, when installing windows server 2008 Std hvm I get always a blue screen telling me: ''a clock interrupt was not received on a secondary processor within the allocated time interval'' I googled around and found, that this occured with vista as well: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-changelog/2007-01/msg00170.html Config is: + virt-install --name=win2008ss

Hi, does anybody have the R logo in a vector format preferable SVG? Need it for Freedesktop (GNOME desktop) integration of Rcmdr ... Thanx, jel. -- Otto-von-Guericke University http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/ Department of Computer Science Geb. 29 R 027, Universitaetsplatz 2 39106 Magdeburg, Germany Tel: +49 391 67 12768

I currently have 2 x ESXi boxes that have VMs stored on a NFS/iSCSI debian lenny linux box. I had purchased a new whitebox server as an intended replacement for the linux box. I had always planned on installing opensolaris on the new hardware with this config; 2 x 640GB mirrored rpool 6 x 1TB in raidz2 This box was going to be built in parallel with the current server and I would have simply

Hi, just found on a X4500 with S10u6: fmd: [ID 441519 daemon.error] SUNW-MSG-ID: ZFS-8000-GH, TYPE: Fault, VER: 1, SEVERITY: Major EVENT-TIME: Wed Feb 11 16:03:26 CET 2009 PLATFORM: Sun Fire X4500, CSN: 00:14:4F:20:E0:2C , HOSTNAME: peng SOURCE: zfs-diagnosis, REV: 1.0 EVENT-ID: 74e6f0ec-b1e7-e49b-8d71-dc1c9b68ad2b DESC: The number of checksum errors associated with a ZFS device exceeded

Hi, does anybody know, how to enforce a certain encoding for readCitationFile()? Haven't found any usable documentation for this :( E.g.: basecit <- system.file("CITATION", package="base") source(basecit, echo=TRUE, encoding="8859-1") readCitationFile(basecit) BTW: 'make check' is a relativ long running task and if one changes a source file, all

Hi list, I''ve got a system with 3 WD and 3 seagate drives. Today I got an email that zpool status indicated one of the seagate drives as REMOVED. I''ve tried clearing the error but the pool becomes faulted again. Taken out the offending drive and plugged into a windows box with seatools install. Unfortunately seatools finds nothing wrong with the drive. Windows seems to see

Hi, in preparation to try zfs boot on sparc I installed all recent patches incl. feature patches comming from s10s_u3wos_10 and after reboot finally 137137-09 (still having everything on UFS). Now it doesn''t boot at anymore: ############################### Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.22.23, 2048 MB memory installed,

We are running 4 Solaris10u7 DomUs on a b113 Dom0 I''d like to upgrade the Dom0 to b122 but not rebuild the DomUs. Below is a typical DomU xml dump. Is there anything obvious that will bite me in upgrading from 113 to 122? Thanks John virsh # dumpxml achilles2 <domain type=''xen'' id=''1''> <name>achilles2</name>

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

Hi, S10U3: It seems, that ufs POSIX-ACLs are not properly translated to zfs ACL4 entries, when one xfers a directory tree from UFS to ZFS. Test case: Assuming one has an user A and B, both belonging to group G and having their umask set to 022: 1) On UFS - as user A do: mkdir /dir chmod 0775 /dir setfacl -m d:u::rwx,d:g::rwx,d:o:r-x,d:m:rwx /dir # samba would

Hi, im trying to attach another volume aka disk to win HVM, however it doesn''t seem to work: + xm block-attach win2008ss phy:/dev/zvol/dsk/pool1/win2008ss.dsk2 \ hdd:disk w 0 results in: elkner.sol ~ > + xm block-list win2008ss --long (0 (vbd (uuid 7cb8fadf-619d-dde6-bda9-dcc18023c7d5) (bootable 1) (devid 768) (driver paravirtualised)

Hello, everybody. I apologize if this is obvious. I've not tried to make changes in R code within the R source itself before. I'm pursuing an experiment to make RPM files for R packages on-the-fly. Any time I install an R package successfully, I want to wrap up those files in an RPM. Basically, the idea is to "hack" an option similar to --build for R CMD INSTALL. I observe

Hello, I recently built a 64-bit R 2.10.1 on OpenSolaris using the Sun Studio 12.1 compilers. I would like to contribute the following notes, to update the OpenSolaris installation instructions. ================================================ 0. GNU libiconv and GNU gettext are assumed to be in /opt/lib. GNU libiconv is easy to build from source. After building it, configure

Hi, Having currently a big problem with R 2.10.1 vanilla (Solaris): As soon as the R_LIBS_USER env var gets bigger than 1023 chars R completely ignores it and uses the default: > Sys.getenv('R_LIBS_USER'); R_LIBS_USER "${R_LIBS_USER-~/R/i386-pc-solaris2.11-library/2.10}" The strange thing is, if I set another envar to the same

I figure this group will know better than any other I have contact with, is 700-800 I/Ops reasonable for a 7200 RPM SATA drive (1 TB Sun badged Seagate ST31000N in a J4400) ? I have a resilver running and am seeing about 700-800 writes/sec. on the hot spare as it resilvers. There is no other I/O activity on this box, as this is a remote replication target for production data. I have a the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 First of all, I'm a physicist and therefore I'm not much used to use statistics. So, please forgive me if this is a FAQ or stupid, but I failed to find the answer by myself. I want to use corr.test to test for the correlation of two data sets (actually I have a lot of data set and perform pairwise testing). But I wanted to find sets where the

Has anyone yet figured out what it would take to make Xen run on top of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 beta? We are heavily invested in Xen under RHEL5 (actually a redhat clone) distribution, but already the xen kernel they are shipping with update 4 and 5 is shaky and has bugs which they don''t seem to be in a hurry to fix. Basically I am wondering if Redhat 6 is just going to have

I have two identical Supermicro boxes with 32GB ram. Hardware details at the end of the message. They were running OI 151.a.5 for months. The zpool configuration was one storage zpool with 3 vdevs of 8 disks in RAIDZ2. The OI installation is absolutely clean. Just next-next-next until done. All I do is configure the network after install. I don''t install or enable any other services.

Is the bug-reporting system working okay? Two days ago, I submitted the following bug report via email to r-bugs at r-project.org. I didn't see a confirmation, and it didn't see it at http://bugs.r-project.org/. Now, http://bugs.r-project.org/ seems to be down. Anyway, here's the bug report related to sort.list and sort(..., index.return = TRUE) with na.last = NA I think that both

Hello all, It was often asked and discussed on the list about "how to change rpool HDDs from AHCI to IDE mode" and back, with the modern routine involving reconfiguration of the BIOS, bootup from separate live media, simple import and export of the rpool, and bootup from the rpool. The documented way is to reinstall the OS upon HW changes. Both are inconvenient to say the least.