similar to: Can a guest LDOM discover the identity of the host system?

Hello, I''m a grad student working at University of Michigan in computer architecture. I''m writing to open up the idea that instrumentation of the xvm would be extremely useful tool for the research community. Those of us interested in virtualization are very interested in monitoring the behavior of these systems and with low engineering effort! I was hoping to get feedback on

[Cross-posting to ldoms-discuss] We are occasionally seeing massive time-to-completions for I/O requests on ZFS file systems on a Sun T5220 attached to a Sun StorageTek 2540 and a Sun J4200, and using a SSD drive as a ZIL device. Primary access to this system is via NFS, and with NFS COMMITs blocking until the request has been sent to disk, performance has been deplorable. The NFS server is a

I''ve tried using S10 U6 to reinstall the boot file (instead of U5) over jumpstart as its a ldom, noticed a another error. Boot device: /virtual-devices at 100/channel-devices at 200/network at 0 File and args: -s Requesting Internet Address for 0:14:4f:f9:84:f3 boot: cannot open kernel/sparcv9/unix Enter filename [kernel/sparcv9/unix]: Has anyone seen this error on U6 jumpstart or is

Hello, I am trying to update files on LDOM boot disk from Control Domain, but I can''t get it working fully. I have a setup that allows to quickly deploy LDOM guest domains. The Golden OS Image of guest domain boot disk is on a ZFS Volume. This ZFS Volume has been Snapshot and Cloned for the quick deployment of guest domains. Filesystem in both the control domain and guest domain is

Hi, since hostid is stored in the label, "zpool import" failed if the hostid dind''t match. Under certain circonstances (ldom failover) it means you have to manually force the zpool import while booting. With more than 80 LDOMs on a single host it will be great if we could configure the machine back to the old behavior where it didn''t failed, maybe with a /etc/sytem

Hello all. We''re a pretty traditional old school sun shop w/a few dozen sun boxes from 1999-2004. We''re doing a try and buy on a sun blade 6000 with a couple of 6250 intel blades and a 6320 blade, looking to use multiple chassis to do a consolidation, using ldoms and xvm server with xvm ops center to manage it all. At least that''s our forward looking plan.... to move

Hello there I''m just testing a module (see merging directories) and it is quite involved, in that it: __generic__ 1) creates a user 2) creates a base directory 3) copies generic files (directory with recursion) 4) generate a configuration file from a template 5) creates a symlink __os specific__ 6) copies os specific files (in my scenario two folders, and an init script) 7)

I have zfs on my base T5210 box installed with LDOMS (v.1.0.3). Every time I try to jumpstart my Guest machine, I get the following error. ERROR: One or more disks are found, but one of the following problems exists: - Hardware failure - The disk(s) available on this system cannot be used to install Solaris Software. They do not have a valid label. If you want to use the

I am running OpenSolaris build 134 on a T1000 (Sparc). It has been an uphill battle getting this far. Many of the commands I find in the various documentation won''t work for me. ------------------------------------------------------------ steve@t1000:~# pfexec pkg install xvm-gui Creating Plan pkg: ''xvm-gui'' matches multiple packages

Suppose I have a storage server that runs ZFS, presumably providing file (NFS) and/or block (iSCSI, FC) services to other machines that are running Solaris. Some of the use will be for LDoms and zones[1], which would create zpools on top of zfs (fs or zvol). I have concerns about variable block sizes and the implications for performance. 1.

I'm attempting to install Hobbit and at the point of web access via Apache. The error_log states: (13)Permission denied: access to /hobbit denied I've tried a number of things and am still getting this: 1) /hobbit is located in /home/hobbit/server/www 2) Made sure all files are in the apache group 3) I've even chcon

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:06:03 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 10:58, RhineDevil wrote: > > You said you didn't want to help me about this but if you'd do at least I'd learn something useful for custom schemas, since this type of error isn't referenced anywhere > > No, I said I wouldn't help you shoot yourself in the

On 11/10/2020 11:06, RhineDevil wrote: > Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: >>> Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >>>> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: >>>>> Done, I still get the same errors when

Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: > > > > Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif > > > > (I used ldbadd instead of ldbmodify, is that a problem?) > > No, that isn't the problem, the problem is that I forgot to remove a > comment :-( > >

Sun, 11 Oct 2020 16:07:31 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 11/10/2020 11:06, RhineDevil wrote: > > Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: > >>> Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >

Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:09:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: > > Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: > >>> Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif > >>> > >>> (I

On 27/07/2020 01:12, RhineDevil wrote: > Sun, 26 Jul 2020 19:03:04 +0100 Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> On 26/07/2020 18:45, RhineDevil wrote: >>> Done, I still get the same errors when adding mod.ldif >>> >>> (I used ldbadd instead of ldbmodify, is that a problem?) >> No, that isn't the problem, the problem is that I

[ Redirecting to xen-discuss@opensolaris.org ] xiao liu wrote: > I installed Nevada b84 on my laptop then built latest onnv-gate > on it. > > After I installed it using Install and try to boot, > it panic for don''t know "/xpvd" (hvmboot_rootconf failed) > > Seems b84 don''t support xpvd/xpv, What should I do now, > should I use BFU instead?

I've been playing around a little bit with the "veto files" option for the [homes] shares we have on our Samba servers (2.2.1a & 2.2.3a). I've discovered that: veto files = /.*/ works marvelously for not letting the users muck with their .dotfiles, which is exactly what we want, however, I've also discovered that it also clobbers the special directory entries

- introduce local variables (shortcuts for frequently used <dom>->grant_table) - adjust first parameter of mapcount() - drop lock acquisition from gnttab_get_version() - remove hard tabs and adjust formatting Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Tested-by: Andrew Thomas <andrew.thomas@oracle.com> --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c @@