similar to: Paramaterized config files

>>>>> Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> >>>>> on Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:15:03 -0800 writes: > On 1/4/17 1:26 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>> Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> >>>>>>> on Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:57:15 -0800 writes: >> > This is a message for someone familiar

Specifically, the srcfile attribute of the srcref attribute of the two instances of the functions contain different environments, AFAICT. Environments are compared only by exact pointer, so this forces return FALSE. Snippets from .Internal(inspect(x)) and .Internal(inspect(y)): @cca008 03 CLOSXP g0c0 [MARK,NAM(2),ATT] FORMALS: @604b58 00 NILSXP g0c0 [MARK,NAM(2)] BODY: @cc9650 06 LANGSXP

On 24/05/2016 00:54, Simon Urbanek wrote: > Um... any reason why you don't simply disable aqua? That file is only compiled if you enable aqua - it has really nothing to do with grDevices ... Also, you can specify a compiler for Objective-C separately and the manual advises you to do so (to specify Apple's clang). > On May 23, 2016, at 7:44 PM, Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at

On 5/2/16 4:25 PM, David Winsemius wrote: >> On May 2, 2016, at 3:45 PM, Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> wrote: >> >> When is the R-3.2.5 binary for Mac OS X likely to show up? > Where did you look? I see both Mavericks and SnowLeopard fork binaries with or without r.app GUI at http://r.research.att.com/ > > I've been using the 3.3.0 RC for a while with

Dear Mick, Note that both knitr and rmarkdown are listed under Suggests: both are required to compile the vignette. Installing rmarkdown should solve the problem. If not, please provide more information. OS, R version, digest version, ... Best regards, ir. Thierry Onkelinx Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature and Forest team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / team

Hello, After I limited max memory usage in one domain, how could I reset mem-max to no-limit? Besides, I used "xm create -F xxxx.xm" to create a domain successfully. But when I shut it down, this domain disappear from "xm list". Why that happened? Thanks. Vincent

OK, .Internal is not necessary to reproduce oddity in this area. I also see things like (notice 1980) > strptime(paste0(sample(1900:1999,80,replace=TRUE),"/01/01"), "%Y/%m/%d", tz="CET") [1] "1942-01-01 CEST" "1902-01-01 CET" "1956-01-01 CET" "1972-01-01 CET" [5] "1962-01-01 CET" "1900-01-01 CET"

Dear Mick, knitr doesn't depends on rmarkdown. It's the vignette that depends on both knitr (for handle the R chunks) and rmarkdown (for the output format rmarkdown::html_vignette). https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Package-Dependencies states: "The ?Suggests? field ...snip... lists packages that are not necessarily needed. This includes packages used

> On 12 Mar 2016, at 00:05 , Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> wrote: > > This is definitely obscure but we had a unit test that called .Internal(strptime, "1942/01/01", %Y/%m/%d") with timezone (TZ) set to CET. Umm, that doesn't even parse. And fixing the typo, it doesn't run: > .Internal(strptime, "1942/01/01", %Y/%m/%d") Error:

> On 27 Mar 2016, at 22:05 , Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> wrote: > > As I understand > https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/sys.parent.html > sys.function(n) returns the function associated with stack frame n. > Since frame 0 is defined as .GlobalEnv which is not associated with a > function, I would expect this to always return NULL.

On 3/27/16 2:46 PM, peter dalgaard wrote: >> On 27 Mar 2016, at 22:05 , Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> wrote: >> >> As I understand >> https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/sys.parent.html >> sys.function(n) returns the function associated with stack frame n. >> Since frame 0 is defined as .GlobalEnv which is not associated with

>>>>> peter dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> >>>>> on Sat, 12 Mar 2016 19:11:40 +0100 writes: > OK, .Internal is not necessary to reproduce oddity in this area. I also see things like (notice 1980) >> strptime(paste0(sample(1900:1999,80,replace=TRUE),"/01/01"), "%Y/%m/%d", tz="CET") ............... >

On 1/4/17 1:26 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> >>>>>> on Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:57:15 -0800 writes: > > This is a message for someone familiar with the implementation. > > Superficially the R code for seq.default and the C code for seq.int > > appear to be semantically very

On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: > | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: > | > | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' > | > | > | This happens right at the start of execution. 'foo' is only executed in > | a branch of an 'if' that is not

When is the R-3.2.5 binary for Mac OS X likely to show up? Mick Jordan

I came across this code in library.R package <- as.character(substitute(package)) where package is the first argument to the "library" function. I've been racking my brains to understand why this is not just an elaborate (and ineffcient) way to write: package <- "package" E.g. > package <- as.character(substitute(package)) > package [1]

Is the mechanism by which packages are tested on CRAN described anywhere? Is it by any chance written in R? The FastR <https://bitbucket.org/allr/fastr/wiki/Home> team is interested in running a virtual CRAN where we can test all the CRAN packages on FastR. Thanks Mick Jordan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

>>>>> Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> >>>>> on Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:11:54 -0700 writes: > I was surprised by this: > R --interactive -e 'interactive()' > bash-3.2$ R -q -e 'interactive()' --interactive >> interactive() > [1] FALSE >> > as the command options document says that

On 09/04/2016 2:55 PM, Mick Jordan wrote: > On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: >> | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: >> | >> | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' >> | >> | >> | This happens right at the start of execution.

>>>>> Mick Jordan <mick.jordan at oracle.com> >>>>> on Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:57:15 -0800 writes: > This is a message for someone familiar with the implementation. > Superficially the R code for seq.default and the C code for seq.int > appear to be semantically very similar. My question is whether, in fact, > it is intended that