similar to: OpenSVC clustered service manager available

Hello, can someone direct me to a code sample showing usage of sys_clone on IA64 ? I use that syscall in the multipathd daemon, and I received compilation errors from IA64 pepole. As I don't have hardware to play with, I'd appreciate guidance. regards, -- christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>

hello, klibc/include/signal.h include asm/signal.h which prefixes the __sighandler_t definition with a __user annotation. __user not being defined previously leads to a compilation breakage. It's the only occurrence for now, so the following dirty work-around works here : add a "#define __user" at klibc/include/signal.h head. regards, -- christophe varoqui

Hello! Yesterday portaudit notified me about squid's vulnerability, but today it didn't (despite I haven't upgraded squid). This has attracted my attention, so I've compared yesterday's and today's auditfile.tbz: -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 29875 Sep 6 15:40 auditfile.tbz vs. -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 5685 Sep 7 10:11 auditfile.tbz I don't see commits to

does anybody have the same problem as I have : (running CURRENT, but the problem occurs on STABLE too) latest portupgrade, ports cvsuped today. fully reproductible with any package... am i missing something ? i hope yes... portinstall -PP teTeX ---> Checking the availability of the latest package of 'print/teTeX' ---> Fetching the package(s) for 'teTeX-2.0.2_2'

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

Hey all - In some previous conversations on the Asterisk mailing lists, we noticed that some users of Asterisk were using UniMRCP [1] with Asterisk, as well as some modules made and distributed by that project. Unfortunately, there were some licensing concerns with using UniMRCP with Asterisk. As such, we contacted the UniMRCP project regarding the licensing issues and, after discussing the issue

Hi all, I''m trying to setup a puppet installation on FreeBSD. So far I have only one puppetmaster and one puppetclient, both with 0.24.4 from FreeBSD ports. On the master I''ve defined a couple of classes including this: class apache22 { package { apache22: ensure => installed, source => "http://x.x.x.x/packages/apache-2.2.9_5.tbz", provider =>

Hello everyone, This email is a continuation of a discussion from almost a year ago, started back here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html As described in that email, this is a complicated topic and deals with sensitive legal issues. I am not a lawyer, and this email is not intended to be legal advice in the formal sense. That said, I have spoken with many

Hello everyone, I'm not sure who to ask about this, but I have a licensing question. I'm writing a utility to allow Git to connect to SMB shares, which uses libsmbclient. I was thinking about using libgit2 in my program: http://libgit2.github.com/ . This library is licensed as GPLv2 only, with a linking exception to link to any program without restriction. My understanding is that, since

Hello Jeremy and samba maintainers, I am using Samba 3.0.37 and I am confused about the license. On one hand both the COPYING file in the 3.0.37 tarball and your website indicates that version 3.0.37 is GPLv2. http://news.samba.org/announcements/samba_gplv3/ On the other hand, in the 3.0.37 tarball, there are many files with GPLv3 headers without any exception. For instance, several file in

I found the samba4 HOW-TO on the wiki and I have followed it to using Ubuntu server versions 11.10 and 10.04. I have been unsuccessful at step 4 running the provision script. I have run the following commands to get to get to this point: $ sudo git clone git://git.samba.org/samba.git samba-master; cd samba-master $ sudo apt-get install build-essential libattr1-dev libblkid-dev libgnutls-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SN-03:01 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issue in samba ports Announced: 2003-04-07 I. Introduction Several ports in the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SN-03:01 Security Notice The FreeBSD Project Topic: security issue in samba ports Announced: 2003-04-07 I. Introduction Several ports in the

On 29 October 2015 at 10:25, Jonas Maebe via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding the previously voiced concerns of incompatibilities between the > Apache and GPLv2 license, I'd like to add one more thing. > > I work on a, at this time mostly LLVM-unrelated [1], "GPLv2 or later" > licensed compiler: the Free Pascal Compiler. Some

Hello, I recently bought an Auralic Aries Mini streamer. This little streamer can also function as a NAS when mounting a laptop drive or ssd inside, via samba. The box did not come with a media containing source code and did not include a GPL written offer. So I asked Auralic to provide the source code for all GPlv2 and v3 packages used. For the Linux kernel and their modifications, they asked

On 15 June 2018 at 21:07, Keith Keller via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > On 2018-06-16, Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: >> >> You agreed to an EULA that says you will not distribute things that you >> get from that paid subscription. You can do it, and be in violation of >> the terms of your subscription. > > Is this

On 19 October 2015 at 18:12, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > One worry is that Apache 2 is incompatible with GPLv2 (is it incompatible with other licenses?) This is interesting, I did not know that... http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html "Despite our best efforts, the FSF has never considered the Apache License to be compatible

December 18, 2007 Dear Madam, dear Sir, the portaudit database is very small: >portaudit -F auditfile.tbz 100% of 5688 B 9737 Bps New database installed. > In addition, portaudit does not complain about what it did complain a few days ago. It seems to me that the database is truncated. By the way: How do I post to a mailing list without being later spammed by the

Hello, If anyone would like it I have provided a Dovecot 1.0 test61 port and package for FreeBSD 5.3 here. I made them for my own experimentation but thought they might be interesting to others I suppose. http://www.helenmarks.co.uk/~dom/dovecot/ These deviate from the stock test61 because I've updated and added a patch I wrote a long time ago for ioloop kqueue/kevent support in