similar to: linux-next: Tree for June 15 (xen)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "linux-next: Tree for June 15 (xen)"

2011 Dec 19
1
linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (xen)
On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20111216: drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c: In function 'xenbus_init': drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c:609:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_domain' Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your
2011 Dec 19
1
linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (xen)
On 12/18/2011 11:55 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20111216: drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c: In function 'xenbus_init': drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c:609:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_domain' Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your
2013 Jun 26
1
linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (xen/x86)
On 06/26/13 01:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130625: > CONFIG_SMP is not set CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector': (.text+0x1dc3cb): undefined reference to `first_system_vector' drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector': (.text+0x1dc3f5): undefined reference to
2013 Jun 26
1
linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (xen/x86)
On 06/26/13 01:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130625: > CONFIG_SMP is not set CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector': (.text+0x1dc3cb): undefined reference to `first_system_vector' drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector': (.text+0x1dc3f5): undefined reference to
2013 Jun 26
1
linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (xen/x86)
On 06/26/13 01:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130625: > CONFIG_SMP is not set CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC is not set on i386: drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector': (.text+0x1dc3cb): undefined reference to `first_system_vector' drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector': (.text+0x1dc3f5): undefined reference to
2020 Apr 16
0
linux-next: Tree for Apr 15 (vdpa)
On 2020/4/16 ??12:16, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/14/20 10:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20200414: >> > on x86_64: > > ERROR: modpost: "vringh_set_iotlb" [drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.ko] undefined! > ERROR: modpost: "vringh_init_iotlb" [drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.ko] undefined! > ERROR: modpost:
2012 Oct 24
3
linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)
On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 201201023: > on x86_64: drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep' drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_external_startup': (.text+0xb9d95): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_external_startup' Full randconfig file is
2012 Oct 24
3
linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)
On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 201201023: > on x86_64: drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep' drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_external_startup': (.text+0xb9d95): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_external_startup' Full randconfig file is
2012 Oct 24
3
linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xen)
On 10/23/2012 09:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 201201023: > on x86_64: drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_reset_prep': (.text+0xb96b5): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_reset_prep' drivers/built-in.o: In function `dbgp_external_startup': (.text+0xb9d95): undefined reference to `xen_dbgp_external_startup' Full randconfig file is
2020 Nov 02
0
linux-next: Tree for Nov 2 [drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.ko]
On 11/1/20 9:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20201030: > on x86_64: when CONFIG_NET is not enabled: ERROR: modpost: "mac_pton" [drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.ko] undefined! Should VDPA_SIM, IFCVF, MLX5_VDPA_NET depend on NET or NETDEVICES? -- ~Randy Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
2020 Aug 10
0
linux-next: Tree for Aug 10 (drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net)
On 8/9/20 9:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > on i386: Lots (63) of left shift warnings: {not all are shown here} CC drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.o In file included from ../include/linux/bits.h:6:0, from ../include/linux/bitops.h:5, from ../include/linux/kernel.h:12, from ../include/linux/vdpa.h:5,
2016 Jul 21
0
linux-next: Tree for Jul 21 (gpu/virtio)
On 07/20/16 23:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160720: > on x86_64, when CONFIG_FB is not enabled: ERROR: "remove_conflicting_framebuffers" [drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtio-gpu.ko] undefined! -- ~Randy
2016 Jul 21
0
linux-next: Tree for Jul 21 (gpu/virtio)
On 07/20/16 23:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160720: > on x86_64, when CONFIG_FB is not enabled: ERROR: "remove_conflicting_framebuffers" [drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtio-gpu.ko] undefined! -- ~Randy
2008 Jun 13
1
linux-next: Tree for June 13 (XEN)
next-20080613 on x86_32 has lots of xen build errors like this: linux-next-20080613/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c: In function 'drop_mm_ref': linux-next-20080613/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:759: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_smp_call_function_mask' make[2]: *** [arch/x86/xen/mmu.o] Error 1 --- ~Randy '"Daemon' is an old piece of jargon from the UNIX operating system,
2008 Jun 13
1
linux-next: Tree for June 13 (XEN)
next-20080613 on x86_32 has lots of xen build errors like this: linux-next-20080613/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c: In function 'drop_mm_ref': linux-next-20080613/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:759: error: implicit declaration of function 'xen_smp_call_function_mask' make[2]: *** [arch/x86/xen/mmu.o] Error 1 --- ~Randy '"Daemon' is an old piece of jargon from the UNIX operating system,
2013 Jan 10
0
linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)
On 01/10/13 11:17, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/09/13 19:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130109: >> > > > on i386, when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled: > > CC [M] drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.o > drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:58:20: error: array type has incomplete element type >
2013 Jan 10
0
linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)
On 01/10/13 11:17, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/09/13 19:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130109: >> > > > on i386, when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled: > > CC [M] drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.o > drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_guest.c:58:20: error: array type has incomplete element type >
2013 Feb 15
0
RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:53:34 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> > wrote: >> >> On Saturday, February 16, 2013 12:50:14 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:26:24 -0500 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >>> <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: >>>>
2019 Jul 19
0
[PATCH v3 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. Introduce paravirtual versions of flush_tlb_multi() for KVM, Xen and hyper-v (Xen and hyper-v are only compile-tested). While the updated smp infrastructure is capable of running a function on a single local core, it is not optimized for this case. The multiple function
2019 Jul 03
0
[PATCH v2 4/9] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 7:04 AM, Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> wrote: > > On 03.07.19 01:51, Nadav Amit wrote: >> To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs >> concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. Introduce >> paravirtual versions of flush_tlb_multi() for KVM, Xen and hyper-v (Xen >> and hyper-v are only