Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[PATCH] tone down the WARN_ON about unexpected APIC writes"
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 5/5] XEN: fixup APIC accessors when !CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
OK, not strictly in keeping with the subject of the patch set but I
needed this to build ;-)
Should be merged into 02d-xen-apic-esp0.patch
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xensource.com>
diff -r 6fdbec59813e arch/i386/paravirt-xen/enlighten.c
--- a/arch/i386/paravirt-xen/enlighten.c Wed Aug 23 15:08:37 2006 +0100
+++ b/arch/i386/paravirt-xen/enlighten.c Wed Aug 23 15:08:37 2006
2007 Apr 26
0
Xen/paravirt_ops kernel available for testing
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce a Xen paravirt_ops kernel available for testing
at http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/paravirt_ops/.
These kernels are based on this morning's 2.6.21, along with all the
paravirt_ops + Xen patches. The pre-built i386 kernel RPM is based on
the FC6 configuration, and it has both Xen and VMI paravirt_ops support
enabled. Unfortunately the RPM is a bit rough,
2007 Apr 26
0
Xen/paravirt_ops kernel available for testing
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce a Xen paravirt_ops kernel available for testing
at http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/paravirt_ops/.
These kernels are based on this morning's 2.6.21, along with all the
paravirt_ops + Xen patches. The pre-built i386 kernel RPM is based on
the FC6 configuration, and it has both Xen and VMI paravirt_ops support
enabled. Unfortunately the RPM is a bit rough,
2007 Apr 26
0
Xen/paravirt_ops kernel available for testing
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce a Xen paravirt_ops kernel available for testing
at http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/paravirt_ops/.
These kernels are based on this morning's 2.6.21, along with all the
paravirt_ops + Xen patches. The pre-built i386 kernel RPM is based on
the FC6 configuration, and it has both Xen and VMI paravirt_ops support
enabled. Unfortunately the RPM is a bit rough,
2009 Feb 10
1
[PATCH 1/2] Fix ixgbe RSS operation
The addition of VMDq support to ixgbe completely broke normal RSS
receive operation. Since RSS is the default operating mode, the
driver would cause a kernel panic as soon as the interface was opened.
This patch fixes the problem by correctly checking the VMDQ_ENABLED
flag before attempting any VMDQ-specific call.
Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
diff -r
2010 Feb 01
0
[PATCH] btrfsck: Remove superfluous WARN_ON
Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
---
diff -urp btrfs-progs-unstable/btrfsck.c btrfs-progs-2/btrfsck.c
--- btrfs-progs-unstable/btrfsck.c 2009-09-28 15:54:55.980479398 +0800
+++ btrfs-progs-2/btrfsck.c 2010-01-31 09:46:24.645485459 +0800
@@ -581,7 +581,6 @@ again:
}
ret = insert_existing_cache_extent(dst, &ins->cache);
if (ret == -EEXIST) {
- WARN_ON(src ==
2017 Feb 14
1
NVAC: WARN_ON(nvbo->pin_refcnt > 0);
Hello fellows!
Signal finally goes through ION's HDMI,
however
# chvt from 5 "graphical" to 3 "textual",
and then at the very end of reboot,
WARN emerges:
...
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: DRM: EVO timeout
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 701 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:137 nouveau_bo_del_ttm+0x7f/0x90 [nouveau]
Modules linked in: ... nouveau
2017 Apr 06
0
NVAC - WARN_ON(nvbo->pin_refcnt > 0);
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 692 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:137 nouveau_bo_del_ttm+0x7f/0x90 [nouveau]
Modules linked in: ... nouveau mxm_wmi video i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper drm wmi ...
CPU: 3 PID: 692 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.10.8-1002.fc24.x86_64 #1
...
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x63/0x86
__warn+0xcb/0xf0
warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
2019 Jan 28
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite
normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is
interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a
debugging message on VCPI failures instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Fixes: f479c0ba4a17 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50: initial support for DP 1.2
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 070/167] drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
From: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 ]
This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite
normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is
interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a
debugging message on VCPI failures instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul
2019 Sep 13
0
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
Hi Greg,
This feels like it's missing a From: line.
commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093
Author: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jan 28 16:03:50 2019 -0500
drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
Is this an artifact of your notification-of-patches process and I
never noticed before, or was the patch ingested incorrectly?
Cheers,
-ilia
2019 Sep 13
0
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > This feels like it's missing a From: line.
> >
> > commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093
> > Author: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> > Date: Mon Jan 28 16:03:50 2019 -0500
> >
2019 Sep 13
0
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:01:11AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > This feels like it's missing a From: line.
2019 Sep 13
0
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:01 AM Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> > Hi Greg,
> >> >
> >> > This feels like it's
2016 Jan 07
6
[Bug 93634] New: WARN_ON triggered on DPMS event
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93634
Bug ID: 93634
Summary: WARN_ON triggered on DPMS event
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
Assignee: nouveau at
2017 Aug 09
6
[Bug 102135] New: WARN_ON hit when loading G71 with v4.13-rc3
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102135
Bug ID: 102135
Summary: WARN_ON hit when loading G71 with v4.13-rc3
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PowerPC
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
Assignee:
2019 Sep 13
2
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
[ Upstream commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093 ]
This is much louder then we want. VCPI allocation failures are quite
normal, since they will happen if any part of the modesetting process is
interrupted by removing the DP MST topology in question. So just print a
debugging message on VCPI failures instead.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Fixes: f479c0ba4a17
2019 Sep 13
3
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>Hi Greg,
>
>This feels like it's missing a From: line.
>
>commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093
>Author: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
>Date: Mon Jan 28 16:03:50 2019 -0500
>
> drm/nouveau: Don't WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
>
>Is this an artifact of your
2010 Aug 19
0
[PATCH] arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c: Fix for crash when apic=debug is used
Hi,
Here is the patch fixing crash when apic=debug
is used and APIC is not properly initialized.
This issue appears during Xen Dom0 kernel boot
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git,
xen/stable-2.6.32.x head), however I think that
patch is rather generic and should be applied
to mainline kernel (it applies to Linux Kernel
Ver. 2.6.35 and Ver. 2.6.32.19 with small fuzz).
2019 Sep 13
4
[PATCH 4.19 092/190] drm/nouveau: Dont WARN_ON VCPI allocation failures
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 03:54:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:46:27AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> > Hi Greg,
>> >
>> > This feels like it's missing a From: line.
>> >
>> > commit b513a18cf1d705bd04efd91c417e79e4938be093
>> > Author: