similar to: rake default(?)/test_unit magic

Hi, I''m writing an RoR application on a source-control system Bitkeeper. for each source file yyy.zzz in Directory XXX it saves a file called x.yyy.zzz in subdirectory XXX/SCCS. when I try to run ''rake test_unit'' it also tries to execute the files of the bitkeeper as unit tests, which of course fails. Is there a way to tell rake to skip all the files in the SCCS

I was just thinking it might be nice to run rake test_units from a controller and put the outputs into the browser. I like the original green or red bar. I figure someone must have done this but a quick search turned up nothing. Any ideas? Gareth -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi! Is there an option that I could provide to the spec runner that would make it stop after it encounters the first spec that fails? Esad

Hi! I just started using RSpec and have some question that I couldn''t find answers to. If I have a result that can have two valid values, is there a better way of writing the following assertion? [value1,value2].should_include actual Is there a more elegant way of performing should_satisfy on a collection, for example I currently use something like collection.each {|x|

Would it make sense for rake db:migrate to support creating databases if it is not found, with blessing from user to prevent typos, or as an additional command line switch. Or am I just being too lazy? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

So, having gotten a story (i.e. Story Runner) working (runs in NetBeans and using ''ruby path/to/story.rb''), I''m looking to see how I''d integrate that with our build. Am I right in assuming that there''s no Rake integration yet, or a report? I couldn''t see any. As far as I can see, "rake spec" doesn''t run or report on my

This is interesting. The default rspec rake tasks generated by Hoe give you an rspec.rake file that looks like: > begin > require ''spec'' > rescue LoadError > require ''rubygems'' > require ''spec'' > end > So far so good. When you invoke rake to do something, say check_manifest > rake check_manifest > You

Hello guys, I''m getting this weird error when trying to run the specs using "rake spec": /home/mauricio/NetBeansProjects/talkies/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/test_process.rb:471:in `method_missing'': undefined method `full_description'' for #<Spec::Rails::Example::ControllerExampleGroup::Subclass_73::Subclass_9:0x7f5fdca4a810>

People, I''m getting an error from Rake I''d like to debug. Here is a screendump: Fri Mar 20 23:28 /b/tmp/myfc23 maco$ rake doc:plugins:rspec (in /b/tmp/myfc23) rdoc -o doc/plugins/rspec --title ''Rspec Plugin Documentation'' --line- numbers --inline-source --charset utf-8 -T html vendor/plugins/rspec/ lib/autotest/discover.rb major-snip 95% [107/112]

I ran into something really puzzling today. I don''t know exactly why it''s happening, but I thought I''d share my experiences. I started a dummy app just to test an idea outside of the context of my real work today. So, I quickly get things started: * rails junk * cd junk * ruby script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/ CURRENT/rspec * ruby

Hi! Is it possible to run unit tests when no database is configured? Rails recipes mentions putting following piece of code in a file within lib/tasks/ [:test_units,:test_functional,:recent].each do |name| Rake::Task.lookup(name).prerequisites.clear end However this seem to be out-of-date, as task lookup in rake according to RDoc is now done using Rake:Task[name]. But after I updated the

Hello, until now I allways used script/runner for running Rails cron jobs I wonder is there is any benefit (except not having any fake runner model in the models directory) to use a rake task instead in lib/tasks Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

I have the latest version of rspec and rails-rspec installed. I''m using the debian versions of ruby and rails. On a new project after a generate an "rspec_model" and then try to run "rake spec", I get the following error: dan at dan-server:~/projects/cw/registration$ rake spec (in /home/dan/projects/cw/registration)

Hi Running ''rake test_units'' using the simple example from the intro video is very slow on my computer. While the tests claim to execute in 0.17 secs, the startup time ad 5.3 seconds to the overall job. On the video, these tasks ran in about 1 second. (Maybe David was doing the tests on a dual proc mac or did some video editing, who knows.) But, I don''t think it should

I have just migrated to use Rail 1.1 from 1.0. In the progress of fixing and cleaning up the unit tests. I found the following problem. I am not sure if this is a bug or it is my environment. When I run "rake test_units, some of the index in association tables is not created, this leads to failures for some unit test cases. Thinking that may be because I didn''t setup the

Hi! It seems that migration doesn''t use single transcation to execute the needed migrations for the database upgrade, so if I have database at version 5, and I wrote some migrations 6..10, and error occurs while executing migration 7, the database stays in state 6? I also think that migration taks could use some more verbosity, for example if migration fails, there''s no

Hi! The following example doesn''t work for me: http://pastie.caboo.se/41732 However, if the call to msg() happens in the specify block after the expecation and not in the setup, it will pass. Why is this? I thought the setup method was there to actually ''construct'' the context and the specifications are some kind of "postconditions" that only need to be

Hello All, If I run my unit tests individually using Ruby, they all work correctly. However, if I try to run them using "rake test_units", I get a bunch of error messages. The error messages appear to be caused by rake not loading any of the fixtures into the test database. I am using PostgreSQL on Windows. Does anyone have any suggestions? Many thanks, Bruce. -- Posted via

Hello rspec-users, I''ve encountered a strange bug in rspec, but it may be me who is wrong. I''m running latest version from the trunk (r1678) of both rspec and rspec_on_rails. Please consider the following model: class Url < ActiveRecord::Base def after_save Contact.create!(:primary_email => ''user at example.com'') raise

mini@mini:~/Sites/music_library$ rake db:migrate rake aborted! couldn''t parse YAML at line 28 column 6 /home/mini/my_gems/gems/railties-3.2.9/lib/rails/application/configuration.rb:115:in `database_configuration'' /home/mini/my_gems/gems/activerecord-3.2.9/lib/active_record/railtie.rb:78:in `block (2 levels) in <class:Railtie>''