similar to: Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate

Hi, I just want to know if somebody use 2.6.31.4 xenified kernel (aka OpenSUSE) in production? We have been testing it on new Nehalem Xeon server for few weeks w/o any problem. But as soon we tried it on production machine - after several production domUs started - hard OS failure. We had to switch back to 2.6.18.8 - xen stock kernel. Peter _______________________________________________

Hello, I''ve downloaded the xen 4.0.1 version as it is explained here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 <http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0>So, I''ve made a clone from repository, with the following command: hg clone -r RELEASE-4.0.1 http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg And finally I''ve built xen, tools and stubdom. I was looking for a

Hello, I''ve downloaded the xen 4.0.1 version as it is explained here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 <http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0>So, I''ve made a clone from repository, with the following command: hg clone -r RELEASE-4.0.1 http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg And finally I''ve built xen, tools and stubdom. I was looking for a

Folks, The first release candidate for 3.0.4 is ready. Please download and test: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.0.4-testing.hg The aim is still for final release before christmas. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Running a heavily modified xen-unstable changset 19590:f80cf52a4fb6 with debugger_attached set, I was seeing the debug traps getting lost from the EXCEPTION_BITMAP in vmx_update_guest_cr() when transitioning from real to protected mode. In my codebase, I could fix this trivially by clearing the debug_state_latch and letting vmx_do_resume() reapply the setting. However, while it looks like a valid

I''ve uploaded updated 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 rebased openSUSE Xen dom0 patches and ebuilds to http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list Notable change is that both include the online resize feature recently posted to xen-devel. Andy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Folks, The tag 4.0.1-rc3 has been added to http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-4.0-testing.hg Please test! -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

Folks, Xen 3.4.2 is the latest maintenance release in the 3.4 stable branch. There are a range of bug fixes since 3.4.1, and we recommend users to upgrade. The source repository can be downloaded from: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg The release is tagged ''RELEASE-3.4.2''. Alternatively source tarballs can be downloaded from:

>That is, I think the following config should work on those Ubuntu >systems > PYTHON=python > PYTHON_PREFIX_ARG='''' >although you may need to do > PREFIX=/usr/local >too. # make tools fails on Ubuntu 9.04 Server with Config.mk suggested above This one Config.mk (untouched) works fine:- PYTHON ?= python PYTHON_PREFIX_ARG ?=

Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in

Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in

I''m installing a new server, and I want know waht is better: - Install xen from source from xen.org version 3.4.2 ? - Install xen fron apt-get from debian package 3.2.1 ? The server has Debian Lenny. What is correct on production server ? -- Martin _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Yes, build issue has been resolved perfectly by Changeset 19594. However, NO  hotplug logs again. root@ServerJaunty:/var/log/xen# ls -l total 788 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 184025 2009-05-15 11:12 domain-builder-ng.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 157480 2009-05-15 11:09 xend-debug.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 446867 2009-05-15 11:14 xend.log I''ve also made same test on F11 preview ( obviously not

We have implemented hugepage support for guests in following manner In our implementation we added a parameter hugepage_num which is specified in the config file of the DomU. It is the number of hugepages that the guest is guaranteed to receive whenever the kernel asks for hugepage by using its boot time parameter or reserving after booting (eg. Using echo XX > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages).

Guys! Tomorrow in my "live" presentation at Linuxcon Xen Directions! I''ll show the Xen Live CD to the public! To celebrate! I want to share my last procedure to get and run Xen 4.0.1 on Ubuntu 10.04 64 bits, here we go: The procedure: 1- Install all the packages: aptitude update aptitude install bridge-utils build-essential libncurses5-dev dpkg-dev debhelper

Hi As you may''ve seen from my last posts I''m struggling to get the setup on my subject line to work without flaws. I''ve tried compiling the Kernel from Source, I''ve also tried Fedora 14, which has a flaky pv_ops Dom0 kernel which DOESN''T work at all, but none of these seem to work. I''m a mid-time XEN user, I just love it and want to stay

Hi As you may''ve seen from my last posts I''m struggling to get the setup on my subject line to work without flaws. I''ve tried compiling the Kernel from Source, I''ve also tried Fedora 14, which has a flaky pv_ops Dom0 kernel which DOESN''T work at all, but none of these seem to work. I''m a mid-time XEN user, I just love it and want to stay

On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:34 +0000, Xen staging patchbot-unstable wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com> > # Date 1194535934 0 > # Node ID 0ebac857649591de0e1b57605b054552afb03297 > # Parent c0bdfda5183d5e9dca5c9bc7a68a6cf40e3f6c58 > xend: Allow for non-existent xen-python-path binary. > On Solaris, xen-python-path is unnecessary.

Hello! I installed NexentaOS (Opensolaris kernel b104+). First booting system is true. Before first rebooting system updates boot_archive. It''s false. Computer is freeze and CapsLock and ScrollLock is blinking. Helps only RESET button. My system is Ubuntu 8.10, kernel-2.6.30-rc3-tip, Xen-3.4-Stable with debug options enabled. My hardware: AMD Athlon64X2 5400+, RAM 4GB. For DomU: mem=1024,