similar to: [PATCH] irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up

vtd: Fix for irq bind failure after PCI attaching 32 times Originally when detaching a PCI device, pirq_to_emuirq and pirq_to_irq are freed via hypercall do_physdev_op. Now in function pt_irq_destroy_bind_vtd, duplicated logic is added to free pirq_to_emuirq, but not pirq_to_irq. This causes do_physdev_op fail to free both emuirq and irq. After attaching a PCI device for 32 times, irq resources

x86:x2apic: Disable x2apic on x86-32 permanently x2apic initialization on x86_32 uses vcpu pointer before it is initialized. As x2apic is unlikely to be used on x86_32, this patch disables x2apic permanently on x86_32. It also asserts the sanity of vcpu pointer before dereference to prevent further misuse. Signed-off-by: Fengzhe Zhang <fengzhe.zhang@intel.com> diff -r 02c0af2bf280

Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing

Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Hello, This series of patches integrates msr.h header. What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy, just a couple of extra code. The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,

Hello, This series of patches integrates msr.h header. What it really does, is a series of steps to allow us to get rid of duplicate code between i386 and x86_64 versions With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy, just a couple of extra code. The first patch was already sent a while ago, but was not yet pushed to any tree , to my knowledge. So it is sent again. Also,

From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_* that don't already #include it. Also remove <linux/kmemleak.h> from source files that do not use it. This is

From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_* that don't already #include it. Also remove <linux/kmemleak.h> from source files that do not use it. This is

Konrad, et al, I am seeing visual corruption (almost like an interlacing problem) with i915 under Xen on some platforms using linux-3.8. See attached file for an example of the visual corruption. This particular platform is an HP Elitebook 2540p The same kernel and ramdisk, when booted as native linux does not show this corruption. dmesg is attached, as well (out.txt) - but I did not see

Hi Ingo, Please pull a few more cpus4096 changes. Most are fairly lightweight with the biggest change being to use cpumask_var_t's for the domain and pending_mask cpumask's in irq_desc. It also deals with this cpu_evtchn_mask bss space bump: 65536 +2031616 2097152 +3100% cpu_evtchn_mask(.bss) Everything merges into tip/master cleanly. Thanks! Mike The following changes since

Hi Ingo, Please pull a few more cpus4096 changes. Most are fairly lightweight with the biggest change being to use cpumask_var_t's for the domain and pending_mask cpumask's in irq_desc. It also deals with this cpu_evtchn_mask bss space bump: 65536 +2031616 2097152 +3100% cpu_evtchn_mask(.bss) Everything merges into tip/master cleanly. Thanks! Mike The following changes since

Hi Ingo, Here''s the chunk of patches to add Xen Dom0 support (it''s probably worth creating a new xen/dom0 topic branch for it). A dom0 Xen domain is basically the same as a normal domU domain, but it has extra privileges to directly access hardware. There are two issues to deal with: - translating to and from the domain''s pseudo-physical addresses and real machine

@@ -491,16 +512,15 @@ int pirq_guest_bind(struct vcpu *v, int int rc = 0; cpumask_t cpumask = CPU_MASK_NONE; + WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&v->domain->evtchn_lock)); I find this WARN_ON() is triggered harmlessly when I assign device to HVM guest. The call trace is XEN_DOMCTL_bind_pt_irq -> pt_irq_create_bind_vtd() -> pirq_guest_bind(). Should we

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100691 Bug ID: 100691 Summary: [4.10] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+0x625/0x740 Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> commit f72e38e8ec8869ac0ba5a75d7d2f897d98a1454e upstream. Instead of x86_hyper being either NULL on bare metal or a pointer to a struct hypervisor_x86 in case of the kernel running as a guest merge the struct into x86_platform and x86_init. This will

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-irqs.patch) Interrupt updates for paravirt ops. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S +++

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-irqs.patch) Interrupt updates for paravirt ops. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S =================================================================== --- clean-start.orig/arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S +++

This patch implements cpu offline feature. Best Regards Haitao Shan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel