similar to: MuraveyWeb CMS status

I am looking for a good CMS based on Rails that has at least these attributes: 1. Ease of use ( as it will be used by people who are not html literate) 2. Very easy/flexible to change layout. So far I have looked at http://rcms.oopen.de/Home/ (have not installed it yet) http://adminpages.flowdev.de http://demo.radiantcms.org/admin/pages http://www.eribium.org/eribium/ MuraveyWeb does not seem

Hey all, Curious if there are any developers out there who have used Plone and are in the process of moving the RoR? I am in need of a rather large CMS soon, and right now it seems to be use Plone or MuraveyWeb, both of which would require extensive customization. While I love RoR, Plone is definitely more mature and well rounded and has more features. The problem of course is it''s not

Hi All, Just 10 days after 3.0.7 we''re releasing 3.0.8 with support for SQLite3. In combination with our demo application, this makes trying out Skyline CMS a breeze. We also enabled Github issues for Skyline to track bugs and issues with Skyline CMS. Besides the SQLite3 support the most notable change since 3.0.7 is the improved API documentation which you can find on

Hi All, I am creating on CMS application and there i am providing feature to create document. I have some issue about scalibilty in CMS: 1. How to make size limitation when user is going to create document. 2. How to make size limitation when user is uploading some documents. 3. How many documents can we create in CMS their is any limit?? 4. How to handle database scalability for CMS

Hi, Could Please tell me how can we use radiant CMS in our application. Is this radiant cms is famous for ROR? Is there any other way to create CMS ror application. Thank you, srinivas rao.pala -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk"

We are about to launch our public beta content management system. We wanted to address our work groups first to give you the opportunity to have first access and update content in the new CMS. Log into https://beta.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups with your LF account. The same account you used for wiki. Click on your respective group and then click Join or Request Membership from the

We are about to launch our public beta content management system. We wanted to address our work groups first to give you the opportunity to have first access and update content in the new CMS. Log into https://beta.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups with your LF account. The same account you used for wiki. Click on your respective group and then click Join or Request Membership from the

We are about to launch our public beta content management system. We wanted to address our work groups first to give you the opportunity to have first access and update content in the new CMS. Log into https://beta.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups with your LF account. The same account you used for wiki. Click on your respective group and then click Join or Request Membership from the

Hi, I am looking into a new website, and a couple of potential designers have recommened using a CMS system built on Ruby on Rails ... one bespoke and one using a customised version of Refinery. Both have said that we will own all the coding, and so will in theory have the flexibility to host the sites anywhere. We are looking at hosting the site with a separate company, and I just wondered if

I put an article up on my Ruby on Rails blog that breaks down all of the known (that I''m aware of) CMS into feature lists and explains the current development situation as I see of it CMS w/ Rails. The blog url: http://rubyonrailsblog.com/ Article specific url: http://www.rubyonrailsblog.com/articles/2006/08/18/ruby-on-rails-cms-breakdown-do-they-all-stink FeedBurner:

I''m working on building out a CMS system on rails (which is making it much easier and enjoyable!). The CMS has multiple fields per page, and each page can have completely different fields from one and another. 90% of the pages will fit within a few different templates/views where the templates/views have all the HTML and then just insert the page fields in the appropriate spot (show

Hello all, I’m moving to Rails from another OO language where I’ve built my own extensive CMS systems - and I’m the kind of guy who learns by breaking things and figuring out why they broke. Strange method but true - I guess I’m just the impatient sort :) Since I’m most familiar with CMS architecture and multi-level user/group/authenicated access systems I thought it logical to start with a

Dear ALL, What are the experiences you have with various open source CMS products (Comparison of PHP-based CMS) such as (Drupal, Joomla, OpenCMS, Typo3, eZ publish ..etc.) Security, Bugs, Performance, Support, Developer Community, learning curve, appearance..etc Thanks -mu

A client has posed me the task of creating a CMS for a customer facing website using Ruby on Rails. Are there any such projects already underway? If not, is a basic CMS going to be too much for one developer to handle? (I can probably outsource a bit but the budget isn''t massive) The project is scheduled to last for 3 months and will probably involve some basic marketing pages,

We''ve just released our first in the RealApps series - a dead-simple CMS for Rails. It''s implemented as a plugin you can download, which then generates scaffolded code for administering your content. It''s designed to be a starter system for small sites, and of course you can build on it as you want. It''s also a good place to look if you want to see how

Hello Rails-list, I''m working on a CMS in Rails. The company that I work for currently uses a CMS written in PHP, and I want to mimick it in Rails, and improve along the way. The PHP variant works with templates like this: In the root of the webdir, there are the template files, named cms_news.html for example. This page contains custom tags, in the form of definitions and

[snip] > welcome simple solutions for that and of all the CMS systems > I reviewed most seem to be done by programmers who stuff them > full of features the secretary responsible for updating the > company website will only get a heart attack from. Well, this is exactly what Contribute was designed for... a remote CMS for largely static content web sites for non-technical people

Hi all, I just had the idea of using webgen as a backend for an end-user friendly CMS. Such an end-user would for example be someone who has no programming or computer skills that go beyond using M$ Word. After logging into a friendly, graphic-based admin area of the website (e.g. PHP or Ruby-based), he/she can easily create, change, delete menu nodes, text content, and do a lot of other

Last night I quietly rolled out the first official release of Radiant: 0.5 - Grindstone. This release was a stability release mostly targeted toward making it easy for people to download and get started with Radiant. Radiant now ships with a simple setup_database script which makes it easy to get up and running with one of three default templates. We also made it easy for people to install

Looks like it''s time for another release of Radiant: http://radiantcms.org/download/ This is primarily a security update. A critical security vulnerability has been discovered in Rails 1.1.4 and previous versions. Rails 1.1.6 seems to fix the problem. This version of Radiant is identical to 0.5.1 apart from the Rails upgrade. It is highly recommended that you upgrade. WHAT IS