Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "qemu VS tapdisk2 VS blkback benchmarks"
2010 Feb 11
6
tapdisk2 segfaults with xen-unstable+linux-2.6-pvops
Hi,
I''m trying to run guest pv vm on my machine running xen-unstable
(xen-4.0.0-rc3.pre + linux-2.6-pvops). However, I get blktap error:
"
sudo xm create -c xmexample
Using config file "./xmexample".
Error: Failed to create device.
stdout: unrecognized child response
stderr:
Check that target "/home/ashish/xen/hd.img" exists and that blktap2
driver
2011 Jun 29
10
xen 4.1.1 + 3.0.0-rc5 dom0 + blktap2
Hi,
I''m currently trying xen 4.1.1 with the 3.0.0-rc5 (heard that it now
contains the xen code to run as front or back xen domain).
Everything seems to run fine, except that I am trying since a few hours
to mount a .vhd file in the dom0.
What I tried so far:
to create a blank vhd file (this is working):
host# vhd-util create -n /storage/test.vhd -s 20G
Then i try to mount the file
2011 Feb 08
0
Will tapdisk2 dispatch requests from different DomUs?
Hi all,
Suppose tapdisk2(a) serves Dom1, tapdisk2(b) serves Dom2, when both
Dom1 and Dom2 are issuing random write requests, is it possible for
tapdisk2(a) to dispatch requests both from Dom1 and Dom2? I hope not,
but when I trace the I/O in Dom0, I notice that tapdisk2(a) dispatches
requests from both guest domains. Is it common? I thought each
tapdisk2 should only dispatch requests from its own
2012 Feb 27
0
segfaulting tapdisk2 process leads to kernel oops
Hi there,
I just found a segfaulting tapdisk2 process which led into a kernel oops.
[1527071.169682] tapdisk2[26548]: segfault at 7fffd324cfe8 ip 000000000040837f
sp 00007fffd324cff0 error 6 in tapdisk2[400000+38000]
[1527071.220104] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0000000000000048
[1527071.220170] IP: [<ffffffff810ce73c>] apply_to_page_range+0x47/0x2f3
2011 Jul 27
4
Creating a vm with a non-existent /dev/mapper/ tap2 device effectively hangs dom0 system
Have an interesting one here, originally found on xen 4.1.0 but just
upgraded to xen 4.1.1 and it''s still here.
Creating a VM with a tap2 device pointed at /dev/mapper/something, when
that device doesn''t exist, causes the tapdisk2 process to go into D mode
and also manages to take out any process that queries it.
For example, I have /dev/mapper/nathanxenuk1 as a valid disk
2011 Jul 20
12
Re: Re: XAPI on debian - sr-create issue
You''re right scout the last line. Out looks like xapi is waiting on tapdisk to plug a key into xenstore. Perhaps a udev rule problem? Perhaps someone who knows more about tapdisk than I well be able to diagnose this tomorrow.
Mike
Sent from Samsung tablet
Sébastien RICCIO <sr@swisscenter.com> wrote:
Of course, here it is attached.
Last line seems interesting. However tapdisk2
2011 Mar 16
3
[PATCH] tools: do not link against unused libraries
# HG changeset patch
# User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
# Date 1300271932 0
# Node ID 7e326d27d899a3133479c8b7c983f660cdeda48c
# Parent f35234b6636a0410a7d5eaa409e98ebe59080e4f
tools: do not link against unused libraries.
A fair few things under tools link against libraries which they don''t
even use.
Most of this appears to come from copy-and-pasting previous Makefile
2011 Sep 07
3
Updated git locations now that kernel.org is no longer hosting?
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone can point me to the new locations for
xen/next-3.0 repo?
git.kernel.org doesn''t appear to be coming back up
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/06/linus_torvalds_dumps_kernel_for_github/)
and the XenParavirtOps wiki page still refers to that. Searching the
list didn''t seem to come up with anything.
Thanks,
Nathan
--
Nathan
2012 May 11
15
Errors of doing "make install-tools" with xen-4.2-unstable?
Hi,
When I do the "make install-tools" with xen-4.2-unstable, there are some
errors about "warn_unused_result".
Is it the error in code or the error in the compiling environment? Thank
you so much.
gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -m64 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -D__XEN_TOOLS__
-MMD -MF .tapdisk-queue.o.d
2010 Sep 07
5
Remus blktap2 issue
Hello,
I have been playing around with Remus on Xen 4.0.1, attempting to fail-over
for an HVM domU.
I''ve run into some problems that I think could be related to tapdisk2 and
its interaction with how one sets up Remus disk replication in the domU
config file.
A few things I''ve noticed:
-The tap:remus:backupHostIP:port|aio:imagePath notation does not work for
me, although this
2010 Jan 28
31
[PATCH 0 of 4] aio event fd support to blktap2
Get blktap2 running on pvops.
This mainly adds eventfd support to the userland code. Based on some
prior cleanup to tapdisk-queue and the server object. We had most of
that in XenServer for a while, so I kept it stacked.
1. Clean up IPC and AIO init in tapdisk-server.
[I think tapdisk-ipc in blktap2 is basically obsolete.
Pending a later patch to remove it?]
2. Split tapdisk-queue into
2010 Nov 01
0
tapdisk2 disks are hotplugging forever
I have a problem that tap:tapdisk:vhd:... is never actually plugged in. What
can be the reason of such a thing happening? John
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2010 Oct 20
1
Bug#586772: xen-utils-4.0: No block tap backends available
Package: xen-utils-4.0
Version: 4.0.1-1
Severity: normal
Due to license issues this version of Xen does not include the blktap2 backend (tapdisk2) and associated utilities (vhd-util, etc.). The decision was made to disable the blktap v1 kernel module (the default is now blktap2). As a result we can't use any tap devices which means worse performance than previousl. Since blktap1 was available
2012 Mar 06
0
Livelock induced failure in blktap2.
We''ve been working on getting XEN 4.1.2 validated for internal use and
have run into what appears to be a livelock induced failure in
properly freeing a blktap2 device.
We ported the blktap2 driver from Dan Stodden''s GIT tree into 3.2.x
which is a reasonably straight forward process. We are also running
the toolchain with a patch which Ian Campbell posted in order to get
xl to
2013 Apr 05
0
[PATCHv2 1/2] Xen PV backend (for qemu-upstream-4.2-testing): Move call to bdrv_new from blk_init to blk_connect
This commit delays the point at which bdrv_new (and hence blk_open
on the underlying device) is called from blk_init to blk_connect.
This ensures that in an inbound live migrate, the block device is
not opened until it has been closed at the other end. This is in
preparation for supporting devices with open/close consistency
without using O_DIRECT. This commit does NOT itself change O_DIRECT
2010 Jun 25
6
Dom0 reboot when several VM reboot at the same time
Hi folks,
I met a problem: when 6 VM reboot at the same time, 3:00 morning, the Dom0
reboot it self:
Xen version is 4.0.0, VMs are windows 2003 with redhat pv, they will update
and reboot itself every 3:00 AM.
# last
... ...
admin pts/0 10.247.1.1 Fri Jun 25 03:40 - 04:30 (00:50)
reboot system boot 2.6.31.13 Fri Jun 25 11:16 (00:-3)
admin pts/0
2010 Jun 25
6
Dom0 reboot when several VM reboot at the same time
Hi folks,
I met a problem: when 6 VM reboot at the same time, 3:00 morning, the Dom0
reboot it self:
Xen version is 4.0.0, VMs are windows 2003 with redhat pv, they will update
and reboot itself every 3:00 AM.
# last
... ...
admin pts/0 10.247.1.1 Fri Jun 25 03:40 - 04:30 (00:50)
reboot system boot 2.6.31.13 Fri Jun 25 11:16 (00:-3)
admin pts/0
2010 May 19
0
blkback.131.xvd or blkback.145.xvda?
Hi have 4 dom0 with debian lenny running xen. When I run ps axf|grep
xvd I see it''s different on diferent dom0s.
dom0-A
15677 ? S< 0:00 \_ [blkback.139.xvd]
15678 ? S< 0:38 \_ [blkback.139.xvd]
17015 ? S< 0:00 \_ [blkback.140.xvd]
17016 ? S< 2:34 \_ [blkback.140.xvd]
21309 ? S< 0:00 \_ [blkback.142.xvd]
21310 ?
2013 Mar 04
4
[blkback] blkback statistic counters are signed values
Hi,
One of our colleagues spotted a problem in xentop. Sometimes the
VBD_WSECT value suddenly becomes unreasonably high, and it turned out
xentop reads
/sys/bus/xen-backend/devices/vbd-(domid)-(devID)/statistics/wr_sect into
an unsigned long long. That value is exposed by blkback, and among other
stat counters, it''s a signed integer:
drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h
struct
2012 Dec 03
1
xen-blkback: move free persistent grants code
Hello Roger Pau Monne,
The patch 4d4f270f1880: "xen-blkback: move free persistent grants
code" from Nov 16, 2012, leads to the following warning:
drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c:238 free_persistent_gnts()
warn: 'persistent_gnt' was already freed.
drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c
232 pages[segs_to_unmap] = persistent_gnt->page;
233