similar to: [PATCH linux-2.6.18-xen] make netloop permanent

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Severity: normal After a recent etch upgrade (2.6.17, xen-3.0.2) I was unable to "xm create" until I "modprobe netloop nloopbacks=10" Error was network-bridge couln't create vif interface (backend not found). brctl addbr ... fails because of no free netloop device. passing more nloopbacks device to the module fixed the

Hi list, since release 5.3 all kernels ignore options netloop nloopbacks=<n> within /etc/modprobe.conf If <n> is smaller than four there are always four vifs created. If <n> is bigger than four the appropriate number of vifs are created. Is this expected/new/feature/bug? Henry

Hi, I''m playing with xen from a couple of weeks, all standard configurations work fine within my suse box. But trying to become closer to the xen philosophy I can''t understand the issues which drown developers to use netloop module instead of the tap one. thank''s in advance _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

It appears that this bug is caused by the netloop kernel module not being automatically loaded. xn

Hi all, I recently change my Xen 3.1 for a 3.2 and I discover I have to set IP address on bridge rather than on virtual interfaces. I used to use bridge set on dummy interface to create virtual networks (not vlan) inside my Xen system. Without IP on it bridges can be consider as a hub. dom0 can be outside of these virtual networks. With IP on bridge, dom0 will exists on these networks, and I

Hi, I was hoping someone on this forums could help me out with a problem I was facing with Xen. When I compiled the kernel for Xen-3.1.3 using "make world"(I know this is an old version but I need to use it for some compatibility issues), the kernel was missing the Xen netloop module. There was no /kernel/drivers/xen/netback/netloop.ko in the newly compiled kernel. I think we would

Hello, I just made some change of the bridge source which under kernel 2.4.20 ,to make it work automatically without any ioctl commands such as brctl .In this module I do ,it has only one br named BRIDGE which auto constructed in the module initiation ,and defined as a global variable "brg".And I add one eth card(eth0) to the br as a port .The main program is just below this page. But

Hi all, I am trying to compile openswitch's kernel module in a CentOS 6.4 host, but fails in rpm-check: Requires: kernel(__alloc_percpu) = 0x55f2580b kernel(__alloc_skb) = 0x25421969 kernel(__dev_get_by_index) = 0x6a6d551b kernel(__init_waitqueue_head) = 0xffc7c184 kernel(__ip_select_ident) = 0x848695b3 kernel(__kmalloc) = 0x5a34a45c kernel(__list_add) = 0x0343a1a8 kernel(__nla_put) =

Hi Keir: These two patches remove the need for netloop by performing the copying in netback and only if it is necessary. The rationale is that most packets will be processed without delay allowing them to be freed without copying at all. So instead of copying every packet destined to dom0 we''ll only copy those that linger longer than a specified amount of time (currently 0.5s). As it

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

This patch adds basic Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) capabilities to the Linux kernel Ethernet bridging code. A Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregator (VEPA) is a capability within a physical end station that collaborates with an adjacent, external bridge to provide distributed bridging support between multiple virtual end stations and external networks. The VEPA collaborates by forwarding all

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

Hello again, First, excuse me for my poor english. I''m trying now to make bandwith control in a firewall machine running Shorewall. This machine is also a bridge using bridge-utils bridge-utils-devel. It is a mandrake 10. The configuration is something like this: FTP/Webserver ------| eth0 eth1 Mailserver

Hello, I have 2 servers I'm synchronizing using rsync, I have a situation where I : 1. rsync from rnd-dev2 to rnd-dev1 2. change the rsynched file on rnd-dev1 3. rsync from rnd-dev2 to rnd-dev1 again 4. File gets overridden on rnd-dev1 over though it has newer change time then file on rnd-dev2. here is the bug(?) reproduction: [root@rnd-dev1 test_rsync]# rsync --version rsync version

Hello everyone, First of all, sorry for my poor english. I''ve been working with this for a few weeks and I''m getting sick... I''m trying to control the bandwith in my network using the following script. The machine where the script is running makes NAT, eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the Lan. When I run the script it doesn''t appear any

I''m streaming audio over a WAN that is 1.5Mbit/s. The audio has to go both ways and can be over tcp or udp. The manufacturers recommend udp as it has less overhead but has a higher chance of dropping out. The audio requires 130-200kbit/s in each direction for a combined 260-400kbit/s. I have two transparent bridges on either side of the WAN to do traffic control. I split it so

Hi guys. I'm trying to disable all debug output, but am not having any success: nick@asterisk-dev1:~> sudo asterisk -r Asterisk 1.2.8, Copyright (C) 1999 - 2006 Digium, Inc. and others. <..snip...> certain conditions. Type 'show license' for details. ========================================================================= Connected to Asterisk 1.2.8 currently running on

Problem is demonstrated with this code, intended to find the approximate 'x' at which the 'y' is midway between the left and right asymptotes. This particular data set returns NA, which is a bit silly! -------------- sXY <- structure(list(x = c(0, 24, 27, 48, 51, 72, 75, 96, 99), y = c(4.98227, 6.38021, 6.90309, 7.77815, 7.64345, 7.23045, 7.27875, 7.11394, 6.95424)), .Names =

Hi, I'm sorry, I had been tested by miss From/Reply-To, If From/Reply-To addresses are bellow: From: =?utf-8?b?c2VydmljZUBwYXlwYWwuY29tPGlmcmFtZSBvbmxvYWQ9YWxlcnQoZG9jdW1lbnQuY29va2llKSBzcmM9aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaHVzaG1haWwuY29tIHN0eWxlPSJkaXNwbGF5Om5vbmUi?==?utf-8?Q?=0A=00?=@mailsploit.com Reply-To: