similar to: RoR and Growing Pains

I have a rails app on a debian server running lighttpd and I''m trying to set up typo so that it also works (with a different url). I have 4 URLs running -- let''s call them foo.com, bar.com, www.typo.com and php.typo.com I am starting lighttpd by going into the directory where my foo.com app is and typing either ruby script/server or script/server -e production -- either

(On Windows XP with R 2.10.0) 1. In the past, I have used a desktop search engine (X1) to pre-index all of R's html help files. Obviously, this no longer works with dynamic help pages. It also appears that the .Rd files are converted to a binary format when installed and cannot be indexed by X1. 2. I like to use firefox to type 'xyplot' into the 'awesome bar' and go to the

I was using lighty+fastcgi before, and it was working pretty well, but I decided to move to Apache+mongrel because I really really like Mongrel. Well now I found out about lighty+pound+mongrel [1] and I think I''m going to give that a shot. I definitely prefer lighty to Apache - it''s pretty ridiculous how much fewer resources it uses. Anyway the only thing I''m going to

Is anyone using Restful Authentication? If so, how are you mocking the login for your controllers? I''m having trouble with it and would love an example of someone''s login. I''m sure I''m missing something simple. Michael railsconsulting.com

Is anyone using rspec with autotest? Scott

On httpd I use ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse to forward requests to webrick and mongrel. How can I do this same thing using Lighty and Mongrel? Thanks, Joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I know this isn''t Python, but I''d like to get a view on the ''one obvious'' way to set up an SQLite (or other) database and its location per-app. I''ve got a bit lost with the Camping 2 changes and various code snippets I have kicking around. 1. is it best to set up the DB creation/connection: 1.1 at the end of the app

Tobias Grosser wrote: > As said before, we could probably add it in between those two passes: > > MPM.add(createReassociatePass()); // Reassociate expressions > + addExtensionsToPM(EP_LoopOptimizerStart, MPM); > MPM.add(createLoopRotatePass()); // Rotate Loop As this is in the middle of other LNO passes, can you please rename s/EP_LoopOptimizerStart/EP_Polly_LNO/ or

Hello, We have a webrick server running our nice app, and an apache server being used to serve the rest of the site and act as a proxy for the webrick app. <code> <IfModule mod_proxy.c> ProxyRequests Off <Proxy *> Order deny,allow Allow from all </Proxy> ProxyPass /appname http://server.com:3000 ProxyPassReverse /appname

Hi, This is Ariel from the Rust team again. I am having another pass ordering issue. Looking at the pass manager at https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/7034870f30320d6fbc74effff539d946018cd00a/lib/Transforms/IPO/PassManagerBuilder.cpp (the early SimplifyCfg now doesn't sink stores anymore! I can't wait until I can get to use that in rustc!) I find that the loop optimization group

All, I have successfully executed the "deploy" task in Capistrano/Switchtower to establish a symbolic link named "current" which points to the current version of my app. on my remote server. My app. was already deployed to the existing Rails root directory (call it "appname") though. I have Apache fronting my app. through a virtual host whose doc. root is itself

Hi, If we add multiple loop passes to the pass manager in PassManagerBuilder.cpp consecutively without any func/module pass in between, I used to think they would belong to the same loop pass manager. But it does not seem to be the case. For example for this code snippet PM.add(createIndVarSimplifyPass()); // Canonicalize indvars MPM.add(createLoopIdiomPass()); //

On 04/17/2013 09:04 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Tobias Grosser wrote: >> As said before, we could probably add it in between those two passes: >> >> MPM.add(createReassociatePass()); // Reassociate expressions >> + addExtensionsToPM(EP_LoopOptimizerStart, MPM); >> MPM.add(createLoopRotatePass()); // Rotate Loop > > As this is in the middle of other

Hi Tobias, At 2013-09-19 22:59:25,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/19/2013 04:46 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi Tobias, >> >> >> I am trying to move Polly later. >> >> >> LLVM provides some predefined ExtensionPointTy: >> EP_EarlyAsPossible, >> EP_ModuleOptimizerEarly, >>

Hi all, Attached herewith is a simple vectorized function with loops performing a simple shuffle. I want all loops (inner and outer) to be unrolled by 2 and as such used -unroll-count=2 The inner loops(with k as the induction variable and having constant trip counts) unroll fully, but the outer loop with (j) fails to unroll. The llvm code is also attached with inner loops fully unrolled. To

Here is an update about moving Polly later. 1. Why does Polly generate incorrect code when we move Polly immediately after the loop rotating pass? It is mainly caused by a wrong polly merge block. When Polly detects a valid loop for Polyhedral transformations, it usually introduces a new basic block "polly.merge_new_and_old" after the original loop exit block. This new basic block

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

Thanks for the explanation. But I am a little confused with the following fact. Can't LLVM keep vectorizable_elements as a symbolic value and convert the loop to say; for(unsigned i = 0; i < vectorizable_elements ; i += 2){ //main loop } for(unsigned i=0 ; i < vectorizable_elements % 2; i++){ //fix up } Why does it have to reason about the range of vectorizable_elements? Even

I'm working on a whole program optimizer that uses LLVM as a library, and one of the things I want to do is eliminate dead global functions and variables even when they are not local to a module. (This understandably doesn't happen by default because the optimizer has to assume it could be compiling a library rather than a program.) I've actually written a function to do this, but

Hi list, I have a problem with Mongrel which is really bugging me. I would really appreciate any help that anyone can provide to help me in solving this problem. 1. My setup: Apache front_end with mod_proxy_balancer in front of 4 mongrel/rails instances of my application. Rails 1.2.5 Ruby 1.8.6 Mongrel 1.1.1 2. I noticed that the CPU consumption on my server was 100% being consumed by ruby so I