similar to: Checksumming problem in pv_ops dom0 kernel / netback

Hi to the ML. I''m new to VLAN configuration, and combining it to XEN is a bit difficult. I want to use VLAN because it''s possible to "arping" from a domU to an other, and VLAN looks like; the only solution to prevent that. May be I''m wrong if someone got a solution, I may be interrested. I''ve also tryed ebtables, but nothing to prevent arp

Hello, I''m trying to setup Xen on a machine with 2 physical network devices using linux bonding without success. I haven''t received any answer on my question on xen-users, the only discussion on this seems to be at http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg01174.html Could someone shed some light on state/ plans regarding Xen and bonding? Regards --

I am rewriting the TX path in the GPLPV drivers and in its current form I am readily able to crash the system (eg Dom0 and everything else running) from DomU. xen is 3.3.1, linux is at most a week behind the 3.3.1 release date. My Windows DomU boots up, fails to get an IP address (yes, the TX path is broken), and then a short time later the system has rebooted. I don''t know exactly

Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in

Is there any real user for this vIRQ? I''m asking because, while debugging a problem that required to add some printk()s that could temporarily issue at a high rate, I ran into the situation that this extra output prevented guest/dom0 boot from making any progress. As I then realized this was due to the tasklet_schedule() called from inside the console handling code, which resulted in

Populate-on-demand: Check pages being returned by the balloon driver This patch series is the second result of my work last summer on decreasing fragmentation of superpages in a guests'' p2m when using populate-on-demand. This patch series is against 4.1; I''m posting it to get feedback on the viability of getting a ported version of this patch into 4.2. As with the previous

I''ve just discovered that I do not have access to the remote gateways for a set of IPsec tunnels to remote networks. This prevents me from changing the routing table on those gateways. I need "roadwarrior" systems connecting to me local network using OpenVPN (tun) to be able to access those systems. Since the remote gateways don''t know about 10.100.1.0/24, where my

HTB performance improvement Hi all ! i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !! this is the scenario of the performance test: i''m using an embedded system with: SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz RAM: 128 MByte FLASH: 16 MByte EEPROM: 8Kbyte PROCESSOR MPC8272 a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending

Hello, can anybody help me how to configure vlans? There are vlans: vlan2 vlan3 vlan30 Server has one nic - eth0. vlan2 should be dom0 eth0(peth0) for management Each vlan3 and vlan30 should be has its own bridge. How to make it? Br Peter _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

hello. i have following setup: a machine (winChip 200mhz cpu, 32mb ram, linux 2.4.28) acting like a bridge with 2 interfaces (eth0 - to our ISP, eth1 - to our network) machine does not have any IP there is a 802.1q vlan eth0.2 eth0.2 and eth1 are bridged in br0 i have one 4mbit link which i share with my friend, i have 3mbit and he has 1mbit all our IP addresses are public and we have the

I have a zone "rw" defined as tun0 in interfaces. From that zone, pings to zone "loc" succeed but pings to remote networks (On IPsec VPNs) are rejected in the all2all chain. From my point of view, these pings should be in the rw2cctc chain. (rw to cctc is ACCEPTed in policy.) I must have a hole in my config, where would it be? Thanks, A.

I am trying to setup GRE between two CentOS 4.5 boxes. I have tried several variations of what''s listed below, but none of them work. box1: modprobe ip_gre ip link set gre0 up ip tunnel add gretun mode gre local 66.1.1.161 remote 66.1.2.161 ttl 20 dev eth0 ip addr add dev gretun 10.253.253.1 peer 10.253.253.2/24 ip link set dev gretun up ip route add 10.2.0.0/16 via 10.253.253.2 box2:

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

Hello all, I have a CentOS box that has a NIC (eth0) on which I defined 4 VLAN's (counting the NIC itself): eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 and eht0.3. Initially the Cisco switch was not partitioned into VLAN's which means that the only VLAN running on it was the default one (VLAN 1). I have then played with VLAN's a bit on the switch and at this point have two: VLAN 1 (which is default and can

Hi All, I''m having a similar issue as Ian Tobin some weeks ago here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-02/msg00645.html I''m using Debian Squeeze amd64, downloaded the experimental debian xen-amd64 kernel with pv_ops support. linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common-xen_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb linux-headers-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb

Hi, I have to install Broadcom driver because the Dell Optiplex 330 running Centos 5.2 is not able to connect to the network. I am trying to install a Broadcom driver, but I get the followng error: [root at localhost tg3-3.85l]# [root at localhost tg3-3.85l]# make make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.el5/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/Server/Linux/Driver/tg3-3.85l modules make[1]: Entering directory

hi all, i want to install xen3.1 on my system, suse linux enterprise server 10 SP1 (kernel 2.6.16.46-0.12). i download the tarball binary file. it contains only "vmlinuz-2.6.18-xen" and "xen-3.1.gz", no initrd. but see the following code in my grub menu.lst, it seems like i need the initrd file. i tried the installation with this binary Tarball, it didn''t work.

Hi, I am trying to do the simplest configuration of traffic shaping. So I did: shorewall.conf TC_ENABLED=Simple tcinterfaces eth0.2 External 500kbit tcdevices eth0.2 500kbit 200kbit And I am testing the speed on that interface - whether I did it ok or not, and my speed is still 4mbit/512kbit. So the question is - How to reduce the speed on interface connected

VM traffic is already limited by a throughput limit, but there is no control over the maximum packet per second (PPS). In DDOS attack the major issue is rather PPS than throughput. With provider offering more bandwidth to VMs, it becames easy to coordinate a massive attack using VMs. Example: 100Mbits ~ 200kpps using 64B packets. This patch provides a new option to limit VMs maximum packets per

Instead of mixing printk and pr_<level> forms, just use pr_<level> Miscellaneous changes around these conversions: Add a missing newline to avoid message interleaving, coalesce formats, reflow modified lines to 80 columns. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 7 +++---- drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 28