similar to: Rails license agreement

ACM Software Copyright and License Agreement I have often seen the use of routines from the ACM Collected Algorithms, i.e. <netlib.org/toms/> (CALGO, or Trans. On Math. Software, TOMS), in Open Source programs, maybe also in some R packages --- and sometimes these programs are distributed under the GPL license, sometimes under proprietary licenses, e.g. in Scilab. The use of these CALGO

*********************************************************** Sigrid M. Volko, Ph.D. Assistant Director Office of Licensing and Technology Development Johns Hopkins University 100 N. Charles Street, 5th Floor Baltimore, MD 21201 phone: 410-516-4962 fax: 410-516-5113 This e-mail message (including any attachments hereto) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:13 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 3 Nov 2016, at 15:55, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > >> I and the other libc++ contributors were all happy to have our code > relicensed under the MIT license (or contribute it under those terms > originally), so there is some pretty clear evidence

Greetings all! # Summary - We will put the new LLVM license and developer policy in place for all subsequent commits next Friday (2019-01-18). - Commit access will be stopped while this is done (starting 3pm PST, hopefully under 3 hours). - We will restore commit access for everyone covered by relevant corporate and/or individual agreements. - Others will need to take some steps to restore commit

Hi all, I'm currently writing an R package and want to declare a GPL2 license. According to the license agreement, I'm supposed to display: "This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation ... See the GNU General Public License for more details."

Hello, I plan to create a commercial software that would automate the running of a few IT security tools and build a nice report, in order to help security auditors in their work. I saw your smbclient tool that could be really appropriate. As this tool is GPL'd, I would like to make sure you agree with the usage (running and parsing) I plan. Of course, should you have any requirement (e.g.

> > > > For clarification: Is my interpretation incorrect? If I compile code > with GCC, which uses templates from libc++ headers and therefore results in > libc++ code being inserted into the resulting binary, am I required to > abide by clause 4 of the Apache license and include the libc++ attribution? > > > > Yes. > > But, AFAIK, this is deliberate. IE

Hello. We are trying to install R on our network, and I wanted to ask if there is a user license agreement. I will be grateful if somebody can send me a link to it; if one exists. Thank you very much ******************************************* Antonio Paredes USDA- Center for Veterinary Biologics Biometrics Unit 510 South 17th Street, Suite 104 Ames, IA 50010 (515) 232-5785 [[alternative

Hello there. I'm seeing with a third party library vendor, wich creates components for signal and audio processing for Delphi and BCB, the way to integrate support for OggVorbis, but there are some license issues that I don't know/understand. In plain text: can he create and distribute a component that uses the code available in the Windows SDK, either in the DLL presentation and/or

Hi Rafael, I believe that all of these points are covered in the first round of discussion, including the FreeBSD team’s position. -Chris > On Apr 27, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, I was on vacations. > > Ed, what is the FreeBSD position about the apache version 2 in base? A > quick search

I want to check out an issue in edge rails. I''ve never used edge before and am having a lot of trouble getting it up and running. Following modified instructions from http://ariejan.net/2009/01/04/how-to-start-a-rails-edge-app-the-easy-way/ $ mkdir -p app/vendor $ cd app $ git clone git://github.com/rails/rails.git vendor/rails $ ruby vendor/rails/railties/lib/rails/cli.rb .

I developed some code that called subroutines from the Port3 Library (http://www-out.bell-labs.com/project/PORT/). I?m thinking about making it available as an R package. But I?m not sure if their NON-EXCLUSIVE SOURCE CODE LICENSE AGREEMENT ( http://www-out.bell-labs.com/topic/swdist/licenses/nesource.txt ) permits this. I tried contacting the contact person listed on the website. Not

Hello everyone, This email is a continuation of a discussion from almost a year ago, started back here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html As described in that email, this is a complicated topic and deals with sensitive legal issues. I am not a lawyer, and this email is not intended to be legal advice in the formal sense. That said, I have spoken with many

When loading mclust, it shows a license agreement message. This message shows up in my document when I use Sweave. I did the following: <<echo=FALSE,include=FALSE>>= library(mclust) @ Is this a problem with mclust, Sweave or with me? How can it be fixed? Thanks for any suggestions! Titus

Folks I have several remotely-located servers, donated by folks not all of whom are computer geeks, let-alone Linux aware. In earlier versions of Centos, I directed them to perform a minimal NetInstall (not too difficult to direct over the phone), and then issue two commands after the first boot. One was a 'curl' to download a script of mine, and the second was a dot-command to run

Hi Everyone, I’d like to start a discussion about how to improve some important issues we have in the LLVM community, regarding our license and patent policy. Before we get started, I’d like to emphasize that *this is an RFC*, intended for discussion. There is no time pressure to do something fast here -- we want to do the right long-term thing for the community (though we also don’t want

Please be patient and read this... Can AJ please change the license of the wine-launcher (like mono does)? You can still keep the libraries under LGPL. Please note proprietary is not bad and no oss w/o proprietary... You can make WINE a standard of binaries because of competition of Linux/BSD/Solaris binaries. It would be good for OS developers if you Change the license of the WINE launcher.

Dear List, Please put me on the right track. I have been searching for the R functions for measures of agreement. Where should I look? Patrik Öhagen Läkemedelsverket Box 26 751 03 Uppsala Tel. +46(0)18-174924 patrik.ohagen@mpa.se [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, Is using Red Hat site for documentation legal? If I understand correctly you have to be a customer of Red Hat to be allowed to use their bandwidth: https://access.redhat.com/help/terms/ "2. Terms Applicable to Red Hat Content. In order to access a Red Hat Portal and Red Hat Content, you must be a current Customer of Red Hat or its affiliates [.......] "Some Red Hat Content may

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team disapproves strongly of the actions taken by Novell on November 2nd. One of the fundamental differences between the proprietary software world and the free software world is that the proprietary software world divides users by forcing them to agree to coercive licensing agreements which restrict their rights to share with each other,