similar to: qemu/rtl8139: Max transmit frame size

Description of problem: libvirt 3.9 on CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (kernel 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64) on Qemu version 2.10.0 I’m currently facing a strange situation. Sometimes my vm is shown by ‘virsh list’ as in state “in shutdown” but there is no qemu-kvm process linked to it. Libvirt log when “in shutdown” state occur is as follows: “d470c3b284425b9bacb34d3b5f3845fe” is vm’s name,

> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > > I think, i had the same problem as you. > > > > When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from > > which you can get groups. So i think, my

I think, i had the same problem as you. When dovecot runs lmtp, no user is logged in, so there is no user from which you can get groups. So i think, my solution is (not really sure, if this is right, it's a long time ago, i played around) this transport in exim for local delivery dovecot_delivery:????????????? ? debug_print = "T: dovecot_delivery_pipe for $local_part@$domain translates

After adding the configuration bit: deny message = invalid recipient domains = +local_domains !verify = recipient/callout=no_cache from: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP/Exim <http://wiki2.dovecot.org/LMTP/Exim> running update-exim4.conf and service exim4 restart the server is still accepting emails to recipients that do not exist in dovecot. Any ideas?

Hi, all, We were running OpenStack with Ubuntu and libvirt 0.9.10. We found that libvirt monitor command not working well. There were a lot of error in libvirtd.log like this 2013-02-07 06:07:39.000+0000: 18112: error : qemuDomainObjBeginJobInternal:773 : Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock We dig into libvirtd by strace and find one of the thread only have the following

Dear Dovecot and Exim users, I have a VPS using these two applications. I am transitioning from a domain_old to a domain_new. I'd like to redirect all the emails from domain_old to the local mailboxes of users @ domain_new. In exim I've assumed that it is enough to add domain_old to the list of local domains: domainlist local_domains = @ : domain_new : domain_old ... begin routers

On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: > >> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >>> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:

> On 28/08/2019 21:07 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > > Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > > > >> On 28/08/2019 21:01 R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Am 28.08.2019 um 19:46 schrieb Jakobus Sch?rz via

Hi Heiko, Here is the router: virtual_aliases: driver = redirect debug_print = "R: Check address using virtual_aliases for $local_part@$domain" allow_fail allow_defer hide data = CHECK_VIRTUAL_ALIASES user = vmail group = mail local_user: debug_print = "R: local_user for $local_part@$domain" driver = accept

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> Once I updated the application to use the updated function call, the >> jitter buffer worked again, giving sane results even with +/- 30 ms >> arrival times and 20% packet loss. So sorry for bothering you with a >> bogus bug report :( >> > > Happy to hear it works. ...but I'm still interesting on test data for > the jitter

On 29.8.2019 12.30, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: > >> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 28/08/2019 21:01

Hi, Heiko Schlittermann <hs at schlittermann.de> (Mo 21 Nov 2016 11:50:13 CET): > a) Routing stage > You need to interact with the user database dovecot uses. > Either you access the user database directory (flat file, LDAP, > whatever) or you use the ${readsocket?} feature of Exim to talk to > dovecot. The readsocket trick doesn't seem to work anymore. Using $

> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:30 schrieb R.N.S. via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > > >> Am 29.08.2019 um 11:23 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: >> >> >> On 29.8.2019 12.18, R.N.S. via dovecot wrote: >>> >>>> Am 28.08.2019 um 20:02 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>:

Hi, I have a mailsystem where i have some local users with shell access and full home dirs which receive mail and also several SQL virtual users only for mail. With the virtual users, everything works fine. Mail is delivered via LMTP and also sieve works :) The SQL Lookup knows what to do with username at domain.com The problem is the system user. If exim delivers the mail to the lmtp

From: MartinS <ams at ludd.ltu.se> isohdp[fp]v.S which says E or C if EBIOS or CBIOS is used. isohdppv.S also says G or M if a GPT or MBR partition is detected. Signed-off-by: MartinS <ams at ludd.ltu.se> --- Comments? diff --git a/mbr/Makefile b/mbr/Makefile index be2bded..7095396 100644 --- a/mbr/Makefile +++ b/mbr/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ include $(MAKEDIR)/embedded.mk all:

Each of the data sets contains monthly observations on price indices for 7 countries. I use the fitted values from reg1 in the reg2 model. The interior loop executes without error as long as I explicitly specify the data set, i.e. data=dat70. However the code fails to execute if I specify the model in the form of the commented line, i. e reg1 <-dynlm(form1,data=Dnames[j]) I get the following

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > My main point of interest is which block is really loaded as first one > of isolinux.bin. [Program snipped.] > (It could be shorter if i did not insist in big endian words.) Why insisting? Anyway appended is a dumper version. I could put up a binery version if needed. Let me know if so. -- MartinS /*

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi, i've Dovecot 10branch head built on on OSX 10.4.7. i've also exim 4.63 configured for use with dovecot's AUTH. on local delivery via exim -> dovecot LDA, i see two errors: (1) dovecot_lda transport output: dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.0.9.8.dylib (2) Child process of dovecot_lda transport (running

I'm using the source-filter option in this patch with the command rsync.exe -a -v -e ssh --source-filter="/cygdrive/c/openssl.exe enc -des3 -pass pass:whatever -a" /cygdrive/c/backup user@dir: to crypt files to be sent at source with openssl. At some point rsync fails an i get 104435520 [main] rsync 1040 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION 104436464 [main]

Hello all, I have a little problem. I'm trying to set up Dovecot deliver (1.0 beta 3) as the LDA for Exim4 on Ubuntu 6.06 with MBOX, and I'm running into permissions problems. Exim typically wants to run pipes as the user to whom the mail is being delivered (as per the "check_local_user"). deliver needs access to the auth socket and needs to be able to create files in /var/mail.