similar to: push_with_attributes not inserting default values

Hello list, I'm having troubles setting up a basic calss hierarchy with S4. Here is a simplified schema of what I'd like to do: - Two classes: A and B that extends A - Ensure that the slots added by B are consistent with the slots of A - Let A initialize itself (I'm not supposed to know the internal cooking of A) - By default set the slots of B based on the slots that A initialized

Oh. So it wasn't just the memory location size that was incorrect on those aliasing checks. I took a look at the tests and it appears that the alias call also catches some cases of restrict/noalias attributes, along with the tbaa info. My first idea of constructing an alias call with no Ptr's but valid tbaa info won't catch that at least. I will create a bug report and try and see if

Hi, I have stupid situation that I may workaround but I think there is an elegant way to deal with. Still I need the community help. In some class X I have: $control = { dev => { id => 7, name => ''GG'' }, prod => { id => 1, name => ''Info'' } } In some other class, which I apply to a node I have defined file from a

I''ve been listening to the discussions regarding the plans to eliminate push_with_attributes. While I think it''s good practice to make join models if you''re developing a new system, I can''t help but think t hat push_with_attributes should be left around to deal with legacy databases. I might want to wrap my application around a database I don''t

In trying to add timestamp support to habtm, I''ve stumped on a question which I hope you all help me solve. And that is, when adding a record twice to the list of associations with push with attributes, should the following test succeed or not? def test_pushing_twice dev = Devel.new("name"=>"victor") p =

Hi, I have a model class called Page and a corresponding pages table in the db. Is there a way to do Page.new without actually creating a corresponding record in the table? I want to set some values in it and then pass it to the add_content_component() method in the class below which calls push_with_attributes() which will actually create the record in the db? class Page <

Can someone please confirm or correct the following statements? If I have the following tables create table as (id int, [...], b_id int); create table bs (id int, [...], a_id int); create table as_bs (a_id int, b_id int); and the associations woould be defined like this class A << ... habtm :bs belongs_to :b end so my Model A has a habtm collection of Bs *plus* a direct

Alias analysis is figuring out the relationship between two pointer expressions, at some location in the program. At a given point in the program, do two expressions always refer to the same location? At a given point in the program, do two expressions never refer to the same location? AliasAnalysis::alias() doesn't explicitly take a "point" in the program because we don't

In the Agile Rails book, on page 232 (PDF, 4th edition) there is an example of (within ActiveRecord) marking an article as read by a user at the present time. Short example code (from the book) here: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :articles def read_article(article) articles.push_with_attributes(article, :read_at => Time.now) end # ... end

Awesome, thanks Arun, that's exactly what I was looking for! On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:21 PM, arun kirshna [via R] < ml-node+s789695n4656749h63@n4.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > Try this: > df[]<-lapply(df,as.character) > df2<-df > df[,1][grep("@",df$names)]<- "" > df > #names emails > #1 bob bobj@cup.com > #2

Hi, as I wrote some weeks ago, I walk through on the SaMBa Guide/Making happy users. I struggled some days with roaming profiles. The client didn't find the default profile on the server (but it applied NTConfig.POL from that share). Finally I found in the windows roaming profile debug log an error: it always referred to \\%L\profiles. When I changed the When I set logon home parameter in

probablly a newbie question: Rails does not support a table with multiple keys ??? it seems that the ActiveRecord set_primary_key method can only set the column name... (hope i''m wrong there) example: table A - P.K id, string name table B - P.K id, string name table C - P.K a_id and b_id, both are also foreign keys. Thanks, Amir. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, 1. I think you should apply the attached patch to openssh-2.9p1, otherwise ssh-keyscan on linux boxes with glibc-2.1 will experience enormous timeout delays. 2. Is there a program like ssh-keyscan for the Version2 (dsa and rsa) keys?? regards Peter Breitenlohner <peb at mppmu.mpg.de> -------------- next part -------------- diff -ur openssh-2.9p1.orig/ssh-keyscan.c

In the past 2 months another change occurred in the CVS code that broke my ssh-keyscan patch. Here's an updated version that tweaks the changed name (in the Kex struct) and also causes an attempt to grab an ssh2 key from an older server (without ssh2 support) to fail earlier and without an error message (Stuart Pearlman emailed me some code for this). This patch is based on the BSD CVS

I''m getting an error when shorewall is trying to add the default routes for my multi-isp configuration. I''ve attached a shorewall dump... If anyone can give some input I''d appreciate it. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument ERROR: Command "ip -4 route replace default scope global table 254 nexthop via 67.110.119.245 dev eth3 weight 1 nexthop via 66.29.181.113

Hi, This subject has been brought up in the forum, but it''s a bit different. If I have a set of tun interfaces. I already defined tun+ as zone A, and I have excluded tun15 as zone B (a subset of zone A). I need to add tun16 to zone B. My config: /etc/shorewall/interfaces: A tun+ - routeback B tun15 /etc/shorewall/ A ipv4 B:A ipv4 I tried to define in

Hello, I''m reading this guide on ipv6 (really just getting my "feet wet"): http://www.shorewall.net/6to4.htm In the section "Configuring IPv6 using my script" I can read that the IPv6 interfaces are: INTERFACES="eth2 eth4" and that correlates fine with the first diagram/figure. However, further down I read "You will notice that sit1, eth0 and eth2

Hi, I''ve been working the past 8 hrs combatting DDoS attacks on websites and dedicated servers I host for clients. They''re hitting one specific IP address, but coming from thousands of external IP addresses. I use: shorewall-4.0.10-3.noarch How can I tackle this? I''ve blocked many subnets in the blacklist file but it''s made very little difference. If

hi who can ever help me out with the shaping of torrent traffic? i have a pptp at ppp0 over eth0 (10.0.0.1/8) i would like to shape outgoing traffic of rtorrent on these two interfaces, assume rtorrent is running at port 6999 need 3mbit for ppp0 and 50mbit for eth0 i supposed: [tcclasses] ppp0 1 2mbit 3mbit 1 eth0 2 20mbit 50mbit 2 [tcrules] 1 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp

I have two models, A and B, with a straightforward many-to-many has_many/through association between them. So, in A I have the association processed_bs and in B I have processedby_as. This works fine. Now, I would like to also have an association unprocessed_bs in A, which holds all Bs that _aren''t_ in processed_bs. I can write a method in A that returns all those objects as a list