similar to: xen bridge script issues? - bond0 vs pbond0

Hi all, I've been seeing this message fill my logs; pbond0: received packet with own address as source address I've tried; ip set link pbond0 down ip set link pbond0 arp off ip set link pbond0 up in /etc/systcl net.ipv4.conf.bond0.arp_ignore = 8 net.ipv4.conf.bond0.arp_announce = 2 I've 2 physycal nics bonded in mode0 called bond0. Are these messages benign and to be ignored?

Hi all, I just noticed that my two nics that are bonded via mode 0 are showing the same mac addy in ifconfig. Is this normal? In syslog I keep getting; kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address Some guidance is appreciated before I dive in and troubleshoot. If I don't list the mac addy in my ifcfg-th# files, only one of the 2 nic comes up during boot.

Hi, I'm new to the list and new to Xen, so please be gentle with me! ;-) I've got a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 machine with two interfaces (eth0 and eth1 unsurprisingly) bonded into bond0 in mode 4, and a Cisco switch set up with LACP to suit. I didn't select Xen at install time as I wanted to install Xen 3.3.1 from the gitco repo. After installing and yum updating, I added the gitco repo

I'm running into a situation where a bogus bonded interface named "bond0" is being created, in addition to the desired "bond2" interface. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone know why it's happening or what I do to get rid of it? I wanted to start my numbering scheme at 2 instead of 0, which I didn't think would be a problem. As you can see, I have no reference

Hello everyone, I''m trying to get multiple guests to connect their networks to the Xen network bridge xenbr0 that''s tied to two bonded interfaces. My current dom0 network looks like this: (eth0 + eth1) => bond0 -> pbond0 -> xenbr0 eth0 and eth1 are bonding under Red Hat EL5, and Xen is configured to use bond0 as the main network device. Xend-config is set to use the

Greetings all. This has been an ongoing issue for me for a few months, and I''ve been trying to get an answer. My server has two NICs, and I want to set up the following: NICs (x2) -> bond (mode 5) -> Xen Bridge -> Doms ...however, trying to configure this doesn''t seem to work: network-bridge steals eth0 instead of bond0, which breaks the bond AND my networking. The

Hi all, i have a xen 4.3 installation and would like to have a bridge bond szenario: *** eth0 eth1 | | bond0 | br0 | vif = [ ''bridge=br0,mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'' ] *** With the network script in debian wheezy *** /etc/network/interfaces auto bond0 iface bond0 inet manual slaves eth0 eth1

Hi, Sorry of this is the wrong list, trying to find some help. I am trying to set up 2 KVM hosts using Debian 9 (connecting to a 3 node Centos 7.4 gluster cluster) To get the bandwidth I have bonded 2 NICS each end. However while the network works fine for the Debian VM host the VM guests cannot connect/get an IP using DHCP connecting to br0. (Same setup on the Centos end works fine however)

Hi all, I've got two gigabit ethernet interfaces bonded in CentOS 5.6. I've set "miimode=1000" and I've tried "mode=" 0, 4 and 6. I've not been able to get better than 112MB/sec, which is the same as the non-bonded interfaces. My config files are: === cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-{eth1,eth2,bond0} # SN1 HWADDR=00:30:48:fd:26:71

took a couple months off due to road blocks, hoping a fresh look would allow me to use my server as desired. I have three ports, eth0-2 over two nics. I want to bond them, and then use a bridge to connect to virtual machines on the virtual host computer. Never having done this, I am confused on some parts. Here is where I am at now and any pointers helpful. Single server, centos 6.x My issue

Hi, This may sound crazy but I will go ahead anyway. Here's my scenario: ifconfig bond0 10.10.10.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 ifenslave bond0 eth0 ifenslave bond0 eth1 brctl addbr stp0 brctl addif stp0 bond0 brctl stp stp0 on Is this a valid scenario? I am trying to bond two interfaces and run STP over the bonded interface..The problem I am trying to solve is to run STP over aggregated links

Hello everyone I am running into some strange issues when configuring networking interfaces on my physical server running Centos 7.5. Let me give you an overview of what's going on: We have a physical server, running CentOS 7.5. This server has one 4 port NIC and one 2 port NIC and a Dell IDRAC port. The first port of the 4 port NIC, em1, is used for Management traffic. The first port of

Hi Neil, Thanks for your comments. What's the purpose of creating spurious ?bond0?? It's confusing. Is it anywhere documented? Every time I restart NetworkManager it creates another bond0! Joe On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: > >> Hi All, >

On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: > Hi All, > > I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. > Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red > Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as > expected. > When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but > not connected to

On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as >> expected. >> When I restart

Hi All, I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as expected. When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing for my other monitoring

Trying to think this through, hope someone can lend a hand. I have 3 eths I want to bond together and that seems simple enough. eth0,1,2 <-> bond0 , though not sure how this would be for multiple ip addresses needed for the virtual machines... perhaps eth:0, eth:1 etc....to bond0:1, bond0:2 ? then I want to bridge to my virtual machines.... I am going to be using virtual machines, each

I have a machine I just deployed w/ tg3 interfaces, I have setup bonding on this same line of server (HP DL380 G4) a million times. I saw there were changes recently to how you configure a bond and have my setup configured according to: http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-7431 The HP switch has a LACP trunk defined on the two ports. Problem is, when rebooting, I need to issue a `service network

Hi All I have two bond interfaces namely, bond0 and bond1. bond0 has two ethernet interfaces associated with it and bond1 also has two ethernet interfaces associated with it. Now i create a bridge interface namely br20 (20 being the VLAN) and assign it a IP Address , subnet mask and the default gateway. I will use this IP to reach the server. So it is like a management bridge for me.

Hi @all, I have a strange problem. Here is the setup: I have a bridging linux box with 3 NICs (Intel e1000). 1 NIC (eth0) connected to the internet interface and the other both (eth1 and eth2) are each connected to a different switch in the bridged network. I setup bonding (bond0) with active failover for eth1 and eth2. Then I added eth0 and bond0 to br0 and brought it up with an ip. I am able