similar to: has_many.collection<<obj doesn''t set attributes?

hey! I have the following table structure in my DB | users | ------------ | (pk)id | | username | | pass | ------------ (1:n) | users_objects | | objectattributes | ------------------ ---------------------------------- | (fk,pk)user_id | (1:n) | (pk)attribute | |(fk,pk)object_id| | (pk,fk)

Hi everyone! I have a problem with defining 2 fk referencing the same table. I have a Program table and a Team table. The Program should have an away team and a home team fk. From my understanding, "the fk column should be named after the class of the target table, converted to lowercase, with _id appended". But, in my case, I have 2 fk referencing the same table. How can I do this?

Hi all, I am new to R-project my problem is I tried to get subset from two different tables its giving error but if i m tring for geting results from one table its working actually i have to take values from two tables with applying different conditions on two tables like kk- is an object of one table and fk- is an object of another table here i have to get values from these tables like

Hello folks, I use to think that a relational databases without foreign keys constraints enforced strictly by the RDBMS were no good, piece of crap, data junk. However, I''ve also learned the hard way that FKs constraints imposes serious difficulties when moving data around, specially between different DBs, or for loading test data or for upgrading DBs schemas, or for porting DBs

I am trying to build a function in a context where the environment concept would appear to be useful. But I'm a bit foggy about this concept and would appreciate some pointers and advice. Basically the function I'm building, say foo(x,t), is a function of two variables). Depending on the value of t, foo will return one of the values f1(x), f2(x), ..., fk(x), where each of f1, ..., fk is

Hello. Has any further action been taken regarding implementing David Simcha's fast Kendall tau code (now found in the package pcaPP as cor.fk) into R-base? It is literally hundreds of times faster, although I am uncertain as to whether he wrote code for testing the significance of the parameter. The last mention I have seen of this was in 2010

Hi Paul, Thanks for the quick response! We use the same type of encoder (Sam Cast) both live for both mountpoints on 96 Kb Joint Stereo. it is difficult to see if it is exactly the same. Is there a player that show exactly this? I will check this. We have use the limit-rate in our config. Thats work better for go to play the last fallback-mount file (i test this). See here our part of the

Hello, I want to implement LLVM backend for a specific VLIW hardware. I am working on defining its instruction set, and assembly language. The hardware has two pipelines, int and float. Each pipeline can do 3 operations/cycle, 3 operations forms an instruction. One of the Integer Instruction looks like this: add Ri, Rj, Rk; add Rl, Rm, Rn; add Ro, Rp, Rq An int instruction and a float

hello. first things first - I am new to ruby on rails (ruby, too), so I''m figuring this is just a basic newbie error. I''m creating a basic photography website. And I have two tables with a relationship: photos: - id (set up as PK) - title - shutter - aperture - date - the_order ...etc photo_comments: - id (set up as a PK) - photos_id (set up as a FK) - author - date -

When I create a child record I''m not automagically getting the parent ID put into the fk field. Does object.new take parameters that allows me to do that as part of the AR record creation? Or do I need to do it separately? Or am I missing the boat altogether ;-) Thanks, Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Basically I have two models: User and Godfather. The godfather table has three columns: - user_id (FK --> User) - user_godfather_id (FK --> User) - description (text) Inside each model class, I am adding the following associations: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :godfathers # for user_id has_many :godfathers, :foreign_key =>

What happens when rsync'ing a file that is damaged bacause of a bad sector on the source medium? I assume that the file will be synchronized partially, overwriting any file of the same name on the destination medium. If that is the case, is there a way to make rsync check readability of files before overwriting them on the target medium (e.g. by synching to a temp. file and, once

Do I have to manually set a column in a dependent table for the id of the object to which it belongs? I have a collection of objects called photos that are owned by a analysis object. When I try to show an attribute of each of the photo objects I get this error: Mysql::Error: Unknown column ''photos.analysis_id'' in ''where clause'': SELECT * FROM `photos` WHERE

I just discovered two directories with the same number of files and the same number of hard links but different size: # stat /home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn \ /hdsync/home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn File: `/home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn' Size: 8192 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 801h/2049d Inode: 52060

Dear useRs, I want to plot the following barplot with lines instead of bars. Is there a way? data <- data.frame(cbind(k = 0:3, fk = c(11, 20,7,2), f0k = c(13.72, 17.64, 7.56, 1.08), fkest = c(11.85, 17.78, 8.89, 1.48))) d <- t(data[,2:4]) barplot(d, beside=TRUE) Regards, Rafael. ____________________________________________________________________________________ [[elided Yahoo

I''m attempting to wrestle an old DB into Rails. This relationship is giving me trouble: class Show < AR::Base has_many :segments end class Segment < AR::Base belongs_to :show has_one :media #this has no PK/FK relation end A Segment is "linked" to Media by Media.name, which is the result of concatenating Segment.name and Segment.part. As I said there are is no

I''m trying to use has_many :through, since my join model deserves being more than just an intersection table. But when I try to break the association, the break only seems "temporary": Let''s say my two tables are Users and Colors, and the join model is Favorites. user = Users.find(1) user.colors.length >> 2 c = user.colors.first >> #<Color:....>

I am working on an Rails application that uses a pretty complex category structure through out the site. I have defined a table to house all the info and a FK to reference parents within the table CREATE TABLE categories ( id int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, name varchar(50) NOT NULL, parent_id int(11) default NULL, constraint fk_category_id foreign key (category_id) references

On a customer's machine running SuSE 9.2, the size of the occupied space on the harddisk is reported incorrectly by "df -h". After we noticed the problem, I rebooted the machine and had it checked by "e2fsck" (check forced with "tune2fs -C 40", we are not on location). Right after the reboot I proceeded as follows, but I could not find any information about

Hi all, I have two tables: TABLE 1 A pk - fk (referencesc TABLE 2) B pk C pk D pk E F TABLE 2 A pk G H I L I don''t use incremental field (id). I''d like don''t use find_by_sql. How can I define both models to use correctly find method (with include)? With only one column primary key I haven''t problems. I thought two solutions, but I don''t like these