similar to: [PATCH] xen/blkfront: remove driver_data direct access of struct device

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] xen/blkfront: remove driver_data direct access of struct device"

2009 Apr 30
3
[PATCH] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at suse.de> In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with all older kernel versions. Cc: xen-devel at
2009 Apr 30
3
[PATCH] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at suse.de> In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with all older kernel versions. Cc: xen-devel at
2009 Apr 30
3
[PATCH] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at suse.de> In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with all older kernel versions. Cc: xen-devel at
2009 Jun 16
0
[PATCH 49/64] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with all older kernel versions. Cc: xen-devel at lists.xensource.com Cc: virtualization at lists.osdl.org Acked-by:
2009 Jun 16
0
[PATCH 49/64] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with all older kernel versions. Cc: xen-devel at lists.xensource.com Cc: virtualization at lists.osdl.org Acked-by:
2009 Jun 16
0
[PATCH 49/64] xen block: remove driver_data direct access of struct device
In the near future, the driver core is going to not allow direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device. Instead, the functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. These functions have been around since the beginning, so are backwards compatible with all older kernel versions. Cc: xen-devel at lists.xensource.com Cc: virtualization at lists.osdl.org Acked-by:
2012 Feb 16
2
[PATCH] blkfront: don't change to closing if we're busy
We just reported to xenbus that we can't close yet, because blkfront is still in use. So we shouldn't then immediately state that we are closing. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index
2012 Feb 16
2
[PATCH] blkfront: don't change to closing if we're busy
We just reported to xenbus that we can't close yet, because blkfront is still in use. So we shouldn't then immediately state that we are closing. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index
2012 Feb 16
2
[PATCH] blkfront: don't change to closing if we're busy
We just reported to xenbus that we can't close yet, because blkfront is still in use. So we shouldn't then immediately state that we are closing. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones at redhat.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2012 Mar 05
11
[PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
From: Santosh Jodh <santosh.jodh at citrix.com> Add support for multi page ring for block devices. The number of pages is configurable for blkback via module parameter. blkback reports max-ring-page-order to blkfront via xenstore. blkfront reports its supported ring-page-order to blkback via xenstore. blkfront reports multi page ring references via ring-refNN in xenstore. The change allows
2008 Apr 04
1
[PATCH] xen: Enable Xen console by default in domU
Without console= arguments on the kernel command line, the first console to register becomes enabled and the preferred console (the one behind /dev/console). This is tty (assuming CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE is enabled, which it commonly is). This is okay as long tty is a useful console. But unless we have the PV framebuffer, and it is enabled for this domain, tty0 in domU is merely a dummy. In that
2008 Apr 04
1
[PATCH] xen: Enable Xen console by default in domU
Without console= arguments on the kernel command line, the first console to register becomes enabled and the preferred console (the one behind /dev/console). This is tty (assuming CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE is enabled, which it commonly is). This is okay as long tty is a useful console. But unless we have the PV framebuffer, and it is enabled for this domain, tty0 in domU is merely a dummy. In that
2008 Apr 04
1
[PATCH] xen: Enable Xen console by default in domU
Without console= arguments on the kernel command line, the first console to register becomes enabled and the preferred console (the one behind /dev/console). This is tty (assuming CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE is enabled, which it commonly is). This is okay as long tty is a useful console. But unless we have the PV framebuffer, and it is enabled for this domain, tty0 in domU is merely a dummy. In that
2007 Apr 18
33
[RFC PATCH 00/33] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2011 Sep 01
9
[PATCH V4 0/3] xen-blkfront/blkback discard support
Dear list, This is the V4 of the trim support for xen-blkfront/blkback, Now we move BLKIF_OP_TRIM to BLKIF_OP_DISCARD, and dropped all "trim" stuffs in the patches, and use "discard" instead. Also we updated the helpers of blkif_x86_{32|64}_request or we will meet problems using a non-native protocol. And this patch has been tested with both SSD and raw file, with SSD we will
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *
2007 Apr 18
24
[patch 00/24] Xen-paravirt_ops: Xen guest implementation for paravirt_ops interface
Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest as a paravirt_ops backend. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen hvc console (console=hvc0) *