Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "DQ35JO (Q35 chipset), Q6600, xen-unstable (~12/21), RMRR/DMAR error"
2007 Dec 07
1
CentOS 5.1 on intel DQ35JO , Q35 chipsed based board
Hi,
i was trying to install CentOS 5.1 on new machine based on Intel Q35 desktop
board, witch 2 SATA disks (configured as RAID 1) , 8GB RAM and Intel Core2
QUADCORE.
The first problem was with install - it hangs before installer startup at
ACPI messages. So i installed it with ACPI=off switch.
The first problem is :
Dec 7 09:54:01 vmhost1 kernel: BIOS bug, no explicit IRQ entries, using
default
2008 Jul 23
0
[PATCH] [VTD] Add RMRR check in DMAR parsing
During parsing DMAR table, if find RMRR is incorrect, return error.
Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2008 May 22
0
Xen 3.2.1, Intel DQ35JO, VT-d not working with Windows 2003
I spent a few hours upgrading one of my Xen boxes so that I''d be able to
use VT-d. I bought a DQ35JO because it seemed like a sure thing.
I can successfully use pciback to hide and grab devices. Specifically I
am trying to pass some USB controllers to Windows. The DQ35JO/ICH9DO
appears to have two independent sets of USB UHCI/EHCI controllers:
00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel
2008 Jun 05
1
VT-d warnings on Intel DQ35JO
hi,
This is what I get on the Intel DQ35JO. Is it critical?
(XEN) Brought up 2 CPUs
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1700: Queued Invalidation hardware not found
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1700: Queued Invalidation hardware not found
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1700: Queued Invalidation hardware not found
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1700: Queued Invalidation hardware not found
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:1708: Interrupt Remapping hardware
2008 Jan 29
0
Intel dq35jo
Hello all,
I'm looking at buying an intel dq35jo mother board.
From what I've read on the net other's have been using the board to one
degree or another for a year now.
My main concern is that I can install CentOS 5 over a network.
Any comments?
--
Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.)
milton at calnek.com
306-717-8737
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
2009 Dec 17
0
trouble with pci passthrough on debian to hvm domain on intel dq35jo motherboard
im trying to do pcipassthrough to a hvm domain on xen 3.4.2 with jeremy''s
pv_ops dom0 kernel 2.6.31.6 on debian lenny. dom0 kernel indicates that
pciback cmdline options are unknown, but config shows
CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND=y is compiled in. is pciback broken on this kernel
or something?
all relevant information i can think is here, let me know if theres anything
else you''d
2008 May 22
3
Xen 3.2.1, Intel DQ35JO tips
I thought I''d pass along a few tips for getting the Intel DQ35JO
motherboard to play nice with Xen:
1. The dom0 kernel won''t boot with CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG enabled.
If you get a hang during boot after seeing this message:
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
...then MMCONFIG is your problem.
Some kernels seem to support a pci=nommconfig option, but my Gentoo
2.6.21 Xen
2009 Jul 26
2
RE: VT-D RMRR is incorrect
tmoore wrote:
>
>
> I`ve raised a support case with ASUS to try to get them to fix the BIOS on
> P6T Deluxe ... I`ll keep this thread updated.
>
> The IOMMU is seriously broken on this board, I have tried many workarounds
> and it always results in failure.
>
>
>
Hello,
did you get a reply? Somebody else has something new about the Asus P6T and
this problem? How
2009 Jan 26
20
Successful PCIe Graphics VT-d Passthrough to Win32 DomU, Q35 chipset
I am happy to announce that I have successfully (and finally!) been able
to pass a PCIe graphics card via VT-d to a Windows XP HVM DomU.
About time!
Config:
-Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad-Core, G0 stepping (I think)
-Intel DQ35JO Motherboard, Q35 Chipset, BIOS v.991 (1/9/09), VT and VT-d
enabled
-nVidia 9500GT (for VT-d passthrough - DomU)
-nVidia GeForce2 MX200 (Dom0 console)
-Xen (build:
2009 Jan 26
20
Successful PCIe Graphics VT-d Passthrough to Win32 DomU, Q35 chipset
I am happy to announce that I have successfully (and finally!) been able
to pass a PCIe graphics card via VT-d to a Windows XP HVM DomU.
About time!
Config:
-Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad-Core, G0 stepping (I think)
-Intel DQ35JO Motherboard, Q35 Chipset, BIOS v.991 (1/9/09), VT and VT-d
enabled
-nVidia 9500GT (for VT-d passthrough - DomU)
-nVidia GeForce2 MX200 (Dom0 console)
-Xen (build:
2012 Aug 04
2
wheezy VT-d passthrough test: DMAR:[fault reason 06h] PTE Read access is not set
lspci -vvv and -t attached
Serial console output: http://pastebin.ca/2177395
Main error appears to be:
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:858: iommu_fault_status: Primary Pending Fault
(XEN) [VT-D]iommu.c:833: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [00:1e.0]
fault addr df8e5000, iommu reg = ffff82c3fff57000
(XEN) DMAR:[fault reason 06h] PTE Read access is not set
onboard nic on the same bus is going
2008 Apr 10
0
[PATCH] VT-d: DMAR device scope parse fixup
Previously applied sanity check fixup is incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Espen Skoglund <espen.skoglund@netronome.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2013 Dec 07
0
DMAR Problem since 6.5
Hello List,
I updated my server to CentOS 6.5. When i boot the system with the new
kernel: 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 I get repeating the following message:
dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 3
dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [00:02.0] fault addr 1fc00000
DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set
I use a Intel Core i5-3550 CPU with vt-d enabled to use a DVB-S Card
inside a Windows
2007 Dec 25
1
[VTD][PATCH] Fix addr_to_dma_page() and rmrr mapping issues
Fix addr_to_dma_page() issue to return l1e correctly, and also clean up
rmrr mapping code, make sure setup rmrr identify mapping just once per
domain.
This patch fixes the VT-d bug (Fail to boot smp Linux guest with VT-d
NIC assigned on IA32e platform).
Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
2012 Mar 05
0
P6T RMRR clarification please
I''m using
(XEN) Xen version 4.1.2 (Debian 4.1.2-2) (waldi at debian dot org)
(gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-6) ) Sat Dec 10 19:58:21 UTC 2011
With VT-d enabled in BIOS the ACPI Direct Memory Access remapping
(DMAR) in the P6T Deluxe V2 (BIOS 1202, 2011/10/10) reports
RMRR (Reserved Memory Region Reporting Structure) is bf7dc000 -
bf7dbfff
e820 table:
2012 Apr 10
0
VT-d BIOS problem with DMAR/ACPI tables | Sabertooth X58
Hi,
I''m not able to activate VT-d on my PC due to a buggy BIOS. Xen fails
to parse ACPI DMAR table. There is a problem with RMRR address range.
My configuration is :
- Debian Weezy
- Xen version 4.1.2 (Debian 4.1.2-2)
- Sabertooth X58 with last bios (1304)
- i7 - 960
I have the following message :
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:704: Host address width 39
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:719: found
2009 Apr 02
3
Re: Re: VT-D RMRR is incorrect
reaver wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Dustin Henning
> <Dustin.Henning@prd-inc.com> wrote:
>> Christian,
>> I am not sure what lead me to believe you had an AMD system. To
>> summarize what I was trying to say, ASUS is claiming that this issue is
>> unsupported because you use Linux, but at the end of the day, the issue
>> has
2015 Mar 12
0
Re: machine='pc-q35-2.1' and sata controller
On 03/11/2015 08:20 PM, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> Laine Stump <laine@...> writes:
>
>> And it is also true that any machine with a SATA controller can't be
>> migrated because of problems with the driver. I just talked to the
>> person responsible for fixing these bugs in qemu, and he said that the
>> patches will go upstream "soon", and that he
2015 Mar 23
0
Re: machine='pc-q35-2.1' and sata controller
On 03/22/2015 08:23 PM, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:56:08 -0400 Laine Stump <laine@laine.org> wrote:
>
>> Here is the info straight from the author (I've also Cc'ed him to this
>> mail):
>>
>> ===============
>> The AHCI migration series is here:
>>
>>
2015 Mar 24
0
Re: machine='pc-q35-2.1' and sata controller
On 03/23/2015 08:05 PM, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:36:33 -0400 John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> Are the needed patches in 2.3.0-rc0?
>>> Is it possible to backport AHCI migration to RHEL 7.1 qemu or will it be too much work?
>>
>> The patches that improve the stability of AHCI migration are in 2.3-rc0.
>> We still have