Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches similar to: "(XEN) mm.c:707:d49 Error getting mfn 2fef3 (pfn 6aef3) from L1 entry"
2008 Apr 06
3
Xen 3.2.1-rc1: ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e()
Xen 3.2.1-rc1 64 bit
Dom0: 2.6.16.33 PAE
DomU: 2.6.18.8 (from a pull a few weeks ago)
If you need the symbols, there from the same Xen I linked to in my post
from a few days ago...
(XEN) mm.c:3498:d4 ptwr_emulate: could not get_page_from_l1e()
(XEN) Unhandled page fault in domain 4 on VCPU 0 (ec=0003)
(XEN) Pagetable walk from 00000000c08187f0:
(XEN) L4[0x000] = 00000004dfa38027
2009 Jul 02
14
debian lenny domU installation
Hi all, a newbie question.
I''m trying to install lenny guest image (in an img file) on my lenny Dom0 by following the http://wiki.debian.org/Xen:
xm create -c xm-debian.cfg install=true install-mirror=ftp://ftp.XX.debian.org/debian
i created the xen-lenny-image.img using dd, format is ext3. disk is defined as (cfg file):
disk =
2009 Mar 02
12
latest pv_ops dom0 (2.6.29-rc6) crashes / unhandled page fault
Hello.
log of the crashing boot process:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-14-xen331-linux-2.6.29-rc6-crash.txt
2.6.29-rc5 based pv_ops dom0 works on the same computer.. with the same Xen version.
I tried with and without pci=nomsi.
adding ''noapic'' doesn''t seem to help (I need that with 2.6.29-rc5 to make it work).
Any ideas
2008 Jul 03
6
2.6.26-rc8 pv_ops causes Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap
Xen: 3.2.1-rc5 64bit
Dom0: 2.6.18.8 (at cs 524) 32-pae
DomU: 2.6.26-rc8 32-pae
root at newark13:~# xm create -f /linodes/xencaker/xen.conf -c
Using config file "/linodes/xencaker/xen.conf".
Started domain xencaker
root at newark13:~#
root at newark13:~# xm dmesg
...
(XEN) traps.c:413:d332 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU
0 [ec=0000]
(XEN)
2008 Feb 07
6
Loading FreeBSD in an HVM-domain on Intel-based host with GRUB
Hello all,
please tell me,
is it possible (at least theoretically)
to circumvent bug 622 [1] by using
GRUB instead of /boot/loader to load FreeBSD kernel?
Or it is silly idea: even if we bypass /boot/loader we will
not be able to run FreeBSD kernel in a HVM-domain on a
Intel-based host for some other reason?
As far as I know, GRUB can''t load FreeBSD kernel
directly, but only can
2008 Aug 21
2
doubt on releasing domain pages
Hi,
I am trying to release domU pages from page_list and xenpage_list
after domU shutdown while retaining the rest of the domain information.
To achieve this in __domain_finalise_shutdown i call
domain_relinquish_resources. This is failing to release pages from
page_list for type PGT_l2_page_tables and crashing dom0.
To be specific, while testing on mini-os i saw that when
2008 May 29
6
is it possible to build two privileged domain at boot time?
Hi All,
I am not very familiar with xen details. Now I am thinking of
building two privilged domain(domain 0 not driver domain) at boot time.
The other question is that wether it is possible to create another
domain 0 by domain-builder running in domain0? Does it make sense
when domain 0 is shut down unexpectedly another domain 0 can run at
once. Maybe it is absurd. I am looking forwards
2006 Sep 22
0
boot crash 2.6.16-18 xen kernel
Hi,
We are running a Sun Fire X2100 with 4GB RAM. We followed the how-to
which we posted on http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/423,
using backports packages for a k7-machine.
We have one Sun Fire X2100 running a 2.6.16-16 kernel from backports,
which is working fine having used the same how-to. Now we are installing
another X2100 using the 2.6.16-18 kernel, which is giving some major
2007 Apr 18
2
Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Hi,Chris?
I wonder which version of Xen did the para-Linux works with.
I applied the patches, compiled them and tried them on both xen-3.0.2
and the latest xen-unstable.
Both result in panics when booting Xen and complain as follows:
(XEN) Domain 0 kernel supports features = { 00000005 }.
(XEN) Domain 0 kernel requires features = { 00000005 }.
(XEN)
(XEN)
2006 Sep 04
0
debian xen packages : work with 2.6.16, reboots when loading dom0 with 2.6.17
I was giving a try to Debian Xen packages (it looks very promising by
the way ; I just happen to love the ? new ? grub which handles xen
images, for instance!) ; I have a box which boots correctly with
xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386_3.0.2+hg9697-2 and a 2.6.16 dom0 kernel, but
crashes when trying to boot linux-image-2.6.17-2-xen-686_2.6.17-7
The result is the same on two boxen (my Pentium M laptop and a
2009 Mar 26
14
Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working
Hello,
When I install guest OS on xen using "xm create /path/of/file/ubuntu.cfg -c"
, I am getting an error message
*"Error*: Device 0 (*vif*) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not
working <http://markmail.org/message/24aj3qs6ddrtwdks>" . I also saw that
hotplugs and udev are prerequisites to be installed before compiling xen. I
could not find hotplugs in Yast.
2009 Mar 26
14
Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working
Hello,
When I install guest OS on xen using "xm create /path/of/file/ubuntu.cfg -c"
, I am getting an error message
*"Error*: Device 0 (*vif*) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not
working <http://markmail.org/message/24aj3qs6ddrtwdks>" . I also saw that
hotplugs and udev are prerequisites to be installed before compiling xen. I
could not find hotplugs in Yast.
2007 Apr 18
2
paravirt xen gpf
Hi,
current paravirt patchqueue dies with ...
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
general protection fault: 0000 [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0
EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7)
EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94
eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04
2007 Apr 18
2
paravirt xen gpf
Hi,
current paravirt patchqueue dies with ...
Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok.
general protection fault: 0000 [#1]
SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0
EIP: 0061:[<c01021a8>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010013 (2.6.20-git8-default-hg770 #7)
EIP is at xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x56/0x94
eax: ffffffff ebx: 00000000 ecx: fbfb9000 edx: ffff8b04
2013 Jun 19
4
e008:[<ffff82c480122353>] check_lock+0x1b/0x45 [konrad.wilk@oracle.com: FAILURE 3.10.0-rc6upstream-00061-g752bf7d(x86_64) 3.10.0-rc6upstream-00061-g752bf7d(i386): 2013-06-19 (tst007)]
Hey,
It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up.
This used to work over the weekend, so I can only surmise
it is one the three patches. This is with a debug=y build
(which has been working nicely for the last month or more).
It looks like one of the patches that went in Xen 4.1 blows up.
This used to work a day ago - that is c/s 23551 worked nicely.
----- Forwarded message
2011 Jul 21
51
Linux Stubdom Problem
2011/7/19 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>:
> CC''ing Tim and xen-devel
>
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote:
>> 2011/7/16 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>:
>> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote:
>> >> 2011/7/15 Jiageng Yu <yujiageng734@gmail.com>:
>> >> > 2011/7/15