similar to: Large index performance = 8x decrease

I was under the impression that Model.rebuild_index will automatically call optimize in the end. But that doesn''t seem to be the case. After running Model.rebuild_index how do I optimize the index. I am using aaf most stable and also ferret most stable. def rebuild_index(*models) models << aaf_configuration[:class_name] unless

Hi all, So far as I know, while using acts_as_ferret, we should add the following declaration in the ActiveRecord model which is going to be indexed: acts_as_ferret({:fields => @@ferrect_fields}) in which @@ferrect_fields is a hash containing all the field to be indexed. This is pretty much for some simple situations. But I got a more complex situation that I want to define the fields to be

Thanks Stuart. I thought I had read somewhere that rebuild_index built the index in a different location and then swapped it, but after looking at the code (in local_index.rb) this doesn''t appear to be the case. That might explain why the ferret server crashes sometimes when a search takes place during a reindex. I wouldn''t be doing exactly the same thing as this but

Hey Dave, I just contributed $100 to the ferret donation box. My project is earning no money yet (but hopefully will), for now I hope this helps you out and covers me for asking stupid questions ;). To get a distance sorted output, I am passing an array of the id field from a ferret search through to mysql in a custom select statement. SELECT ... id IN (#{ids.join(",")}) This has

Hi, I''m trying to figure out how to compile ferret with large file support, but none of the topics that discuss this actually say How this is done. Can someone please provide the info? thanks. -m my exact problem: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/94143#191630 this topic also discusses the issue: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/84237#151791 this topic says that the FAQ should have the

On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:35 AMPDT, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly > reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux > compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. > > We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the > source IR on both systems

Say the user first enters "ruby" for search and gets 1000 results. Then he can search "rails" just in the 1000 results just returned. The common scenario is some kind of advanced search. User can incrementally add criteria and the program will narrow the results step by step. I know that at least I can use all the criteria as a whole to do the searching, but this is a waste

Hi, I''m using acts_as_ferret in my rails application and I''d like to use more_like_this to retrieve some ''similar'' item suggestions. I have a class ''items'' which has a status field and I need to retrieve items that only have one of the two possible statuses. Looking at the more_like_this method indicates it supports an :append_to_query

I''m running: ferret (0.10.9) ruby 1.8.5 (2006-08-25) [i386-mswin32] on Windows XP(SP2) When I create an index as follows: field_infos = FieldInfos.new(:store => :yes, :term_vector => :no, :index => :yes) field_infos.add_field(:id, :index => :untokenized) field_infos.add_field(:subject) field_infos.add_field(:author) field_infos.add_field(:tags, :store => :no) index =

Hi guys! Been reading this list for a while. I have two repeatable Ferret crash bugs, both seg faults. 1. The first bug appears to seg fault Ferret when you use quotes in a search argument (eg ''file_name:"file name"'') 2. The second bug appears to seg fault Ferret when you attempt to index text with very long tokens (above 256 chars). It may have something to do with

Hi, Using llvm-stress, I got a crash after Post-RA pseudo expansion, with machine verifier. A 128 bit register %vreg233:subreg_l32<def,read-undef> = LLCRMux %vreg119; GR128Bit:%vreg233 GRX32Bit:%vreg119 gets spilled: %vreg265:subreg_l32<def,read-undef> = LLCRMux %vreg119; GR128Bit:%vreg265 GRX32Bit:%vreg119 ST128 %vreg265, <fi#10>, 0, %noreg;

Hi all, Please test this and let me know if it's causing any problems in sound playback, preferably with media applications and games, any feedback would be appreciated. The patch won't fix existing problems, it should just decrease the audio lag. As such I would prefer only to receive feedback on issues INTRODUCED or FIXED by this patch. If it's causing issues, I want to know:

Hi, I was running asterisk 1.0.7 but we've upgraded now to CVS-HEAD. I've noticed this.. and several people have commented that audio quality seems to have gone down hill. Just going phone-->asterisk-->PRI. I've not changed the configuration files during the upgrade. sip.conf is: allow=ulaw allow=ilbc allow=g726 allow=g729 allow=g723.1 And all the phones had been using

Hi all How can i decrease the speed of festival? It appear that in festival, the text is read too fast for me ___________________________________________________________________________ Nouveau : t?l?phonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! D?couvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international. T?l?chargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

Hi. The UPGRADE.txt of asterisk distribution contains the following snippet under the MeetMe heading: /"MeetMe: * The conference application now allows users to increase/decrease their speaking volume and listening volume (independently of each other and other users); the 'admin' and 'user' menus have changed, and new sound files are included with this release.

Hi, I read many articles about how to increase Xen file-space but I need to decrease the file size. Any suggestion? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20100405/225b0ac9/attachment-0006.html>

Dear list i am using Asterisk 1.2.5 with A@H . here is my problem. if i dial a number (consider 79) i have to wait around 20 seconds before my Asteisk box response. now i want to decrease this waiting time . any idea how to do that ? thanks Salaque

Hi all, How can I decrease the number of ticks on the y-axis in a lattice levelplot()? I have as many ticks displayed on the y-axis as I have columns of data (1000 columns), how can I decrease this amount of ticks, while still properly displaying all the data? Note that I get my data from a matrix object, in which the z-values of the levelplot are the actual values in the matrix, whereas the

I just installed Xubuntu 8.04, Wine 0.9.60 and Warcraft 3. Ive set it so it uses OpenGL and in game i get less than 30fps with everything on low and a low resolution. On Windows i can run it on medium with 1280x800 at 60fps. Im new to Xubuntu/linux so i dont know what could be causing it. Is this expected from Wine? Specs are 1GB RAM, Intel C2D 1.66GHZ, Intel 945GM onboard graphics.

The following script creates a search index and then searches it. I get no results? Where am I going wrong? Thanks. -----------BEGIN SCRIPT---------------- require ''rubygems'' require ''ferret'' include Ferret path = ''/tmp/myindex'' field_infos = Ferret::Index::FieldInfos.new() field_infos.add_field(:name, :store => :yes, :index => :yes)