similar to: Sql Server 2000 booleans not working

Hey all -- I''ve been using enumerable char(1)''s with ''y'' and ''n'' values for my Boolean columns in Rails, but it strikes me there should be a better way. How do you setup columns that represent true/false-ness in your schemas on Rails? Wondering what kind of standard approaches there are other than me writing something like class MyEntity

So i had a boolean attribute in my model which gets interpreted to tinyint(1) in mysql by rails migrations. Now tinyint(1) accepts a range in mysql and i want to change my boolean attribute to an attribute which can accept 3 values(0,1,2). I made the change to the view and when i post the form selecting the selecting the value ''2'', it still gets saved as a ''0''.

this may seem silly but i just noticed that if in mysql the column which is a tinyint(1) happens 2 or greater, by a chance of glitch or corruption in the database(i did it manually ofcourse but i am speaking hypothetically), rails would see it as false. but i find that really wrong seeing how in mysql it sees any non-zeroes as true. i really think if it does happen to be any number other than 1

Hi, Here's a list of all the booleans I tweaked on my server running CentOS 7: $ sudo cat /etc/selinux/targeted/active/booleans.local # This file is auto-generated by libsemanage # Do not edit directly. named_write_master_zones=0 httpd_can_sendmail=1 httpd_unified=1 ftpd_full_access=1 httpd_can_network_connect=1 spamd_enable_home_dirs=1 How can I "reset" (in a manner of speaking)

Hi i have a column in my ferret model called sponsored. It is a boolean and i want to order the results by sponsored and date registered. At the moment it is not managing to sort the booleans. I tried declaring this in my model but it seems to have had no effect. def false.<=>(o) o ? -1 : 0 end def true.<=>(o) !o ? 1 : 0 end I''m using the acts_as_ferret plugin. below

I''m a little confused as to how booleans work in Rails. Which is better in the database? boolean or int(1)? True == 1 and False == 0, right? Using SQLite, I tried to set a value to true inside the database but it gave me an error. MySql didn''t, so I had to switch to int(1) for it to work. Is this just how it is? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received

Howdy, Names changed to protect the innocent... I have a column, lets say ''complete'' on a table, lets say ''todos''. I originally had that column as boolean (as its true/false) I added an association to User... has_many :outstanding_todos which had a :conditions => "complete = false". When I run this up it doesn''t work, and the reson it

Hi Roland, > define <4 x float> @masked_add_1(<4 x i1> %mask, <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) { > entry: > %add = fadd <4 x float> %a, %b > %sel = select <4 x i1> %mask, <4 x float> %add, <4 x float> %a > ret <4 x float> %sel > } > > I will get: > > addps %xmm1, %xmm2 > pslld $31, %xmm0 >

Hi Duncan, thanks for the hint. I tried both variants: define <4 x float> @masked_add_1(<4 x i1> signext %mask, <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) define <4 x float> @masked_add_32(<4 x i32> %mask, <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) Unfortunately, this will raise an assertion: Wrong types for attribute: zeroext signext noalias nocapture sret byval nest

On 1/1/19 12:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > For mainly historical reasons we tended to use int to store boolean > values. However using bool is probably safer in some corner cases > (eg. ‘v == true’ can fail badly if v is an int, but works for bool). The problems only occur when v is an int and set to something other than 0 or 1. But yes, in general using the bool type is worth

Hi, I''ve just run into a small glitch with Hiera. I have a YAML file that has a definition like this: puppet_agent_splay: false but the run fails because of "err: Could not find data item puppet_agent_splay in any Hiera data file and no default supplied at /puppet/modules/puppet/manifests/agent/config.pp:6 on node slave1.local" Digging into this it turns out that lookup in

Hi all, I'm currently trying to figure out the best way to pass vector of booleans to other functions. Take this small example: define <4 x float> @vcmp_add(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) { entry: %cmp = fcmp olt <4 x float> %a, %b %add = fadd <4 x float> %a, %b %sel = select <4 x i1> %cmp, <4 x float> %add, <4 x float> %a ret <4 x

Hi Language Lawyers! In PR23827 ( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23827 ), a bitwise op on booleans is considered equivalent to a logical op: if ((x < 3) & (y > 10)) effectively becomes: if ((x < 3) && (y > 10)) where x and y are of type 'int'. The second statement (&&) requires short-circuit evaluation to bypass the y comparison when the x

Hello, there is a table that has a column TINYINT(1) called status. Through mysql console I see its value as 1 (when is true) but if I do this in Rails console: Mytable.status => true give me "true" rather "1". How could I change 1 to true using some method? Or true to 1? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are

I have a select list for a boolean column in postgresql in the ''model'' ... YES_NO = [ [ "Yes", "1" ], [ "No", "0" ] ].freeze in the ''view code'' ... <%= options = [[''Accepted?'', '''']] + Placement::YES_NO select("placement", "accepted",

Hey all I've been running a Dovecot 1X server for awhile. Most of the config was pretty simple using flat files. I'm switching to Dovecot 2X now, and want to switch to using SQL for lookups so I can share info with the Postfix front end. For starters I setup two SIMPLE SQL tables -- a 'users' table and a 'aliases' table, where each user can have many aliases. I want to

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de > wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:51:38PM -0600, Sanjay Patel wrote: > > Assuming the transform is correct, what is the recommended way to write > > this in C/C++ to achieve the desired effect: we want both comparisons to > be > > evaluated (do *not* want short-circuiting)? > >

Hi, Anyone got any cool tricks for converting a Rails site (in this case, a typo installation) from a mysql database to a postgresql database? I''ve got it almost working -- I''m doing a SQL dump from mysql and loading it into postgres. However, mysql does booleans as a tinyint with 0 = false and 1 = true. When I try to import that into a postgres database that expects booleans

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > To: "Sanjay Patel" <spatel at rotateright.com>, "Clang" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, > joerg at britannica.bec.de > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 8:55:22 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] bitwise ops on booleans > > >

For mainly historical reasons we tended to use int to store boolean values. However using bool is probably safer in some corner cases (eg. ?v == true? can fail badly if v is an int, but works for bool). bool was added in C99 so let's use it. --- server/internal.h | 16 +++++------ server/connections.c | 28 +++++++++--------- server/crypto.c | 4 +-- server/main.c | 67