similar to: RE: [PATCH][TOOLS] Reducing impact of domainsave/restore/dump on Dom0

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "RE: [PATCH][TOOLS] Reducing impact of domainsave/restore/dump on Dom0"

2017 Aug 11
0
[Gluster-devel] How commonly applications make use of fadvise?
On 08/11/2017 04:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out >> fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching >> translators like read-ahead etc. After discussing about it, we agreed >> that our
2017 Aug 11
3
[Gluster-devel] How commonly applications make use of fadvise?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Hi all, > > In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out > fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching > translators like read-ahead etc. After discussing about it, we agreed > that our performance translators can leverage the hints to provide > better
2010 Nov 04
4
fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)
I've recently been trying to track down the root cause of my server's persistent issue of thrashing horribly after being left inactive. It seems that the issue is likely my nightly backup schedule (using rsync) which traverses my entire 50GB home directory. I was surprised to find that rsync does not use fadvise to notify the kernel of its use-once data usage pattern. It looks like a
2020 Aug 07
3
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 07:53:13AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > >$ free -m; time ./nbdkit file /var/tmp/random fadvise=sequential cache=none --run 'qemu-img convert -n -p -m 16 -W $nbd "json:{\"file.driver\":\"null-co\",\"file.size\":\"1E\"}"' ; free -m ; cachestats /var/tmp/random > > Hmm - the -W actually says that qemu-img is
2010 Nov 23
1
[RFC PATCH] fadvise support in rsync
Warning for kernel folks: I'm not much of an mm person; let me know if I got anything horribly wrong. Many folks use rsync in their nightly backup jobs. In these applications, speed is of minimal concern and should be sacrificed in order to minimize the effect of rsync on the rest of the machine. When rsync is working on a large directory it can quickly fill the page cache with written data,
2017 Aug 11
2
[Gluster-devel] How commonly applications make use of fadvise?
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 05:50:47PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: > > > On 08/11/2017 04:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:47:47AM -0400, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out > > > fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs'
2012 Feb 18
4
FADV_DONTNEED support
While going through an old todo list I found that these patches had fallen by the way-side. About a year ago I initiated a discussion[1] with the Linux kernel folks regarding the lack of any useable fadvise support on the kernel side. As a result, I was observing extremely poor performance on my server after backup as executable pages were being swapped out in favor of data waiting to be flushed
2017 Aug 11
2
How commonly applications make use of fadvise?
Hi all, In a conversation between me, Milind and Csaba, Milind pointed out fadvise(2) [1] and its potential benefits to Glusterfs' caching translators like read-ahead etc. After discussing about it, we agreed that our performance translators can leverage the hints to provide better performance. Now the question is how commonly applications actually provide hints? Is it something that is used
2020 Aug 08
1
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] plugins: file: More standard cache mode names
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 12:28 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 01:24:02AM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > The new cache=none mode is misleading since it does not avoid usage of > > the page cache. When using shared storage, we may get stale data from > > the page cache. When writing, we flush after every write which is > >
2020 Aug 07
2
[PATCH nbdkit] plugins: file: More standard cache mode names
The new cache=none mode is misleading since it does not avoid usage of the page cache. When using shared storage, we may get stale data from the page cache. When writing, we flush after every write which is inefficient and unneeded. Rename the cache modes to: - writeback - write complete when the system call returned, and the data was copied to the page cache. - writethrough - write completes
2020 Aug 07
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020, 16:16 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 07:53:13AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > >$ free -m; time ./nbdkit file /var/tmp/random fadvise=sequential > cache=none --run 'qemu-img convert -n -p -m 16 -W $nbd >
2020 Aug 07
3
[PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
You can use these flags as described in the manual page to optimize access patterns, and to get better behaviour with the page cache in some scenarios. For my testing I used the cachedel and cachestats utilities written by Julius Plenz (https://github.com/Feh/nocache). I started with a 32 GB file of random data on a machine with about 32 GB of RAM. At the beginning of the test I evicted the
2013 Jan 13
6
[Bug 9560] New: drop-cache option
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560 Summary: drop-cache option Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: colundrum at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at
2020 Aug 07
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 04:43:12PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020, 16:16 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > I'm not sure if or even how we could ever do a robust O_DIRECT > > > > > > > We can let the plugin an filter deal with
2020 Aug 07
2
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 04:43:12PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020, 16:16 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure if or even how we could ever do a robust O_DIRECT > > > > We can let the plugin an filter deal with that. The simplest solution is to > drop it on the user and require aligned requests. I mean this is very error
2007 May 07
1
Announce: rsync fadvise (cache dropping) patch updated
Hi List, I have updated my rsync fadvise patch which stops rsync from ousting all your other data from cache when running large jobs. I have also written an article about the whole issue. http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fadvise.html cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten http://it.oetiker.ch tobi@oetiker.ch ++41 62 213 9902
2020 Aug 07
2
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:29:24PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > These ones? > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-August/msg00078.html > > No, we had a bug when copying image from glance caused sanlock timeouts > because of the unpredictable page cache flushes. > > We
2009 Dec 21
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7004] New: Use posix_fadvise to free cached file contents when done
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7004 Summary: Use posix_fadvise to free cached file contents when done Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ted at
2020 Aug 07
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:29:24PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > These ones? > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-August/msg00078.html > > > > No, we had a bug when
2020 Aug 10
1
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] file: Implement cache=none and fadvise=normal|random|sequential.
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 02:14:22AM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:29:24PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > These ones? > > > >