similar to: [PATCH 1/4] Various VT-d code cleanup

The patches are as follows: Patch 1: Map RMRR in intel_iommu_add_device() if the device has RMRR; move domain_context_mapping() to be in front of list_move() in reassign_device_ownership(). Patch 2: There is only one INCLUDE_ALL DMAR unit in system, but no restriction on whether it''s the last unit. Patch 3: Change code style of pci.c file, and add spin_unlock(&pdev->lock) when

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

Xen 3.4 xen-unstable.hg from yesterday with debian etch on 64bit arch Intel/Lenovo Q35 Mainboard with VT-d enabled Bootoptions iommu=1 vtd=1 pci.backhide for a PCI-E nvidia graphiccard xm dmesg Error messages includes: [VT-D] iommu.c: 1694:d32767 iommu: mapping reserved region failed [VT-D] iommu.c: 1542:d0 intel_iommu_add_device: context mapping failed If i try to start my HVM by xm create

Fix addr_to_dma_page() issue to return l1e correctly, and also clean up rmrr mapping code, make sure setup rmrr identify mapping just once per domain. This patch fixes the VT-d bug (Fail to boot smp Linux guest with VT-d NIC assigned on IA32e platform). Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

hi, I am trying the Xen unstable on X48 chipset these days but it failed due to an corrupted RMRR table in the ACPI. The following is the acpi dump of DMAR. DMAR @ 0x7fef1000 0000: 44 4d 41 52 20 01 00 00 01 d1 49 4e 54 45 4c 20 DMAR .....INTEL 0010: 44 58 34 38 42 54 32 20 12 06 00 00 4d 53 46 54 DX48BT2 ....MSFT 0020: 13 00 00 01 23 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....#...........

Rather than requiring the scopes to be the first members of their respective structures (so that casts can be used to switch between the different views), properly use types and container_of(). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c @@ -304,13 +304,15 @@ static int __init scope_device_count(con

Hi, I did a git pull on pv_ops tree this morning and now get a crash when eth0 is started, here is the full boot log: Booting ''Xen 3.4 / Linux 2.6.29-rc6-tip'' root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 kernel /xen.gz com1=115200,8n1 console=com1,vga iommu=1 [Multiboot-elf, <0x100000:0x131748:0x8e8b8>, shtab=0x2c0078, entry=0x100000] module

Hello, I''m also seeing this exact same problem. I''ve posted on xen-users, but did not get an answer. Venkat seems to be experiencing the same problem as me. I have the latest BIOS for my motherboard DQ35JO. (BIOS ver 933) I''m running a Q6600 as well. It hangs at "Brought up 4 CPUs." I''ve tried all sorts of combinations of Xen versions and kernels to

tmoore wrote: > > > I`ve raised a support case with ASUS to try to get them to fix the BIOS on > P6T Deluxe ... I`ll keep this thread updated. > > The IOMMU is seriously broken on this board, I have tried many workarounds > and it always results in failure. > > > Hello, did you get a reply? Somebody else has something new about the Asus P6T and this problem? How

During parsing DMAR table, if find RMRR is incorrect, return error. Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

reaver wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Dustin Henning > <Dustin.Henning@prd-inc.com> wrote: >> Christian, >>        I am not sure what lead me to believe you had an AMD system.  To >> summarize what I was trying to say, ASUS is claiming that this issue is >> unsupported because you use Linux, but at the end of the day, the issue >> has

This patch removes a wrong if condition judgement to setup rmrr identify mapping for guests, and passes page count rather than address size to iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(). Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu <Anthony.xu@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

On Xen-3.3.0, domain0 Megaraid SAS (SAS 1068 controller) driver is not loading correctly if vtd support in Xen is enabled. It fails at the point of initializing firmware. I wasn''t seeing this error with Xen-3.2.2-rc3 (Unstable version), though with vtd disabled in Xen-3.3.0, it is working. Looks like a degrade problem. Any clues? Thx, Venkat

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Convert the Intel IOMMU driver to use the probe_device() and release_device() call-backs of iommu_ops, so that the iommu core code does the group and sysfs setup. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 67 ++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) diff

Hi, I''m not able to activate VT-d on my PC due to a buggy BIOS. Xen fails to parse ACPI DMAR table. There is a problem with RMRR address range. My configuration is : - Debian Weezy - Xen version 4.1.2 (Debian 4.1.2-2) - Sabertooth X58 with last bios (1304) - i7 - 960 I have the following message : (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:704: Host address width 39 (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:719: found

We should only assign intel_dma_ops to devices which will actually use the iommu and let the default fall back dma_direct_* functions handle all other devices. This won't change any behaviour but will just use the generic implementations for direct mapped devices rather than intel specific ones. Signed-off-by: Tom Murphy <murphyt7 at tcd.ie> --- drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 52

Hi Kevin, On 28/08/17 08:39, Tian, Kevin wrote: > Here comes some comments: > > 1.1 Motivation > > You describe I/O page faults handling as future work. Seems you considered > only recoverable fault (since "aka. PCI PRI" being used). What about other > unrecoverable faults e.g. what to do if a virtual DMA request doesn't find > a valid mapping? Even when

Hi Kevin, On 28/08/17 08:39, Tian, Kevin wrote: > Here comes some comments: > > 1.1 Motivation > > You describe I/O page faults handling as future work. Seems you considered > only recoverable fault (since "aka. PCI PRI" being used). What about other > unrecoverable faults e.g. what to do if a virtual DMA request doesn't find > a valid mapping? Even when

Hi, I''ve successfully used VT-d on an ASUS P6T mainboard which is known to have really buggy RMRR tables. I tested passtrough with: - the onboard (fake-)raid-controller (no problems) - a pci card (no problems) - VGA cards (worked only partly - I''ll investigate that) I wrote a little patch to the code parsing the RMRR tables and enabled the following command line options: