similar to: [PATCH 0/2] Add hugetlb support for PV

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/2] Add hugetlb support for PV"

2008 Oct 02
11
[PATCH 1/2] PV hugepages - Xen patch
This patch enables support of hugepages in a pv Xen environment. It is against the latest xen unstable tree on http://xenbits.xensource.com. The patch assumes the guest is passing a physically aligned hugepage. It does reference counting on all the underlying pages. Dave McCracken Oracle Corp. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list
2008 Nov 04
7
[PATCH 1/1] Xen PV support for hugepages
This is the latest version of a patch that adds hugepage support to the Xen hypervisor in a PV environment. It is against the latest xen-unstable tree on xenbits.xensource.com. I believe this version addresses the comments made about the previous version of the patch. Hugepage support must be enabled via the hypervisor command line option "allowhugepage". It assumes the guest
2011 Jul 20
4
[PROPOSED REMOVAL] PV guest superpage mappings
The PV superpage mapping feature has been in the hypervisor for a while now, but I''m not away of any use of this feature by an upstream guest kernel (e.g., and primarily of interest, pv_ops Linux). Am I mistaken, or is anyone looking into or interested in this? If the feature is unused we should remove it from the hypervisor in this development cycle, as it''s untested and is
2011 Jan 10
9
Hugepage Support
hi, I tried to make huge page request in Fedora x86_64 PV guest using xen 4.1 unstable and it crashed(crash info given below) I had enabled superpages in config file I had also set hugepages parameter at boot time for the PV Dom U By excuting # cat /proc/mem_info | grep Huge gave me that there are 10 free huge pages available , still the domain crashed. [ 86.403654] BUG: unable to handle
2018 Mar 19
2
[PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts
Export the number of successful and failed hugetlb page allocations via the virtio balloon driver. These 2 counts come directly from the vm_events HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC and HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC_FAIL. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Helman <jonathan.helman at oracle.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 6 ++++++ include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1
2018 Mar 19
2
[PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts
Export the number of successful and failed hugetlb page allocations via the virtio balloon driver. These 2 counts come directly from the vm_events HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC and HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC_FAIL. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Helman <jonathan.helman at oracle.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 6 ++++++ include/uapi/linux/virtio_balloon.h | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1
2006 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
Another option might be g95 instead of gfortran. I haven't used it for a while, but I seem to recall it working fine in gcc 4.0.1. On 9/11/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 9/9/06, Chris
2018 Mar 20
2
[PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts
> On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 2018?03?20? 06:14, Jonathan Helman wrote: >> Export the number of successful and failed hugetlb page >> allocations via the virtio balloon driver. These 2 counts >> come directly from the vm_events HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC and >> HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC_FAIL. >> >>
2006 Sep 11
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > You wrote: > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with
2018 Mar 22
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?03?20? 12:26, Jonathan Helman wrote: > > > On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2018?03?20? 06:14, Jonathan Helman wrote: > > > > Export the number of successful and failed hugetlb page
2018 Apr 09
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts
On 03/22/2018 07:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?03?22? 11:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018?03?20? 12:26, Jonathan Helman wrote: >>>>> On Mar 19, 2018, at 7:31 PM, Jason Wang<jasowang at redhat.com>? wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
2018 Apr 12
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts
On 04/10/2018 08:12 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?10? 05:11, Jonathan Helman wrote: >> >> >> On 03/22/2018 07:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2018?03?22? 11:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 09:52:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> On 2018?03?20? 12:26, Jonathan Helman
2005 Aug 24
3
[LLVMdev] Problems running dejagnu tests
I'm having troubles running the test suite on OS X 10.4. Inside my objdir, 'make check' gives this: % make check llvm[0]: Running test suite
2006 Sep 01
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran: patch, question
On 9/1/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them > > like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to > > the tree. I'd like to make it as easy as possible to apply these, so > > let me know any rules I
2006 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran: array constructor problems
On 9/6/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: [snip] > > ../../src/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp:3871: failed assertion > > `(TREE_CONSTANT(exp) || TREE_CODE(exp) == STRING_CST) && "Isn't a > > constant!"' > > > > In this case, TreeConstantToLLVM::Convert() is getting a constant to >
2005 Sep 17
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Problems Cross Compiling for x86 and ia64
OK, I noticed a few problems with my previous email, so I will boil the question down: What I want to do is compile for x86 and ia64 from darwin. I also want to load my own passes into opt and llc. Should I be using llvmc at all here, or should I be doing something like llvmgcc -> gccas -> opt -> llc ? I've given up on the filetype=obj argument, so now the problem is that llc is
2018 Apr 13
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] virtio_balloon: export hugetlb page allocation counts
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 03:01:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?12? 08:24, Jonathan Helman wrote: > > > > > > On 04/10/2018 08:12 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2018?04?10? 05:11, Jonathan Helman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/22/2018 07:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >
2005 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] Making a pass available to llc?
On 7/25/05, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 21:48 -0700, Michael McCracken wrote: > > On 7/25/05, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > Why not just create your pass as a shared object and: > > > > > > opt -load mypass.so -mypass | llc > > > > My pass is an implementation of an analysis group that
2007 Apr 12
7
[LLVMdev] Compiler name: Nāga
Hi, the idea of a dragon theme reminded me of the dragon-like serpents called "Nāga" from Cambodian mythology, among other places. Here's a brief link explaining the specific Cambodian meaning - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naga_(mythology)#N.C4.81gas_in_Cambodia I like this as a name, because it's unique short and easy to type and remember (as long as you omit the accent,
2005 Aug 24
1
[LLVMdev] Problems running dejagnu tests
OK, that explains it. I probably didn't have runtest installed the last time I ran configure, and re-syncing with CVS also caused it to reconfigure, solving the problem but confusing me. Thanks, -mike On 8/24/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this