similar to: Workaround for the corrupted Intel X48 DMAR table

Hello, I''m also seeing this exact same problem. I''ve posted on xen-users, but did not get an answer. Venkat seems to be experiencing the same problem as me. I have the latest BIOS for my motherboard DQ35JO. (BIOS ver 933) I''m running a Q6600 as well. It hangs at "Brought up 4 CPUs." I''ve tried all sorts of combinations of Xen versions and kernels to

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

I try pci pci passthrough with xen 3.3.1 and CentOS 5.2(64bit) on a SUPERMICRO C7X58 board I see the following the error in my boot log. (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:372: RMRR is incorrect. This problem is caused by this condition in dmr.c:372. if ( rmrr->base_address >= rmrr->end_address ) { dprintk(XENLOG_ERR VTDPREFIX, "RMRR is incorrect.\n"); return -EFAULT; } As an

Rather than requiring the scopes to be the first members of their respective structures (so that casts can be used to switch between the different views), properly use types and container_of(). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c @@ -304,13 +304,15 @@ static int __init scope_device_count(con

Hi list, I have a problem with a new laptop (reproducable on other machines too) and the xen hypervisor. When the hypervisor gets booted with VESA mode 800x600 I see some messages and then the screen contents is switched into a pattern of vertical colored lines and never comes back. In text mode all works well, but later the pattern appears when the X servers starts. I disabled VTd in the bios

Purchased DQ35JO on Vt-d/PCI passthrough wiki''s recommendations. Built latest xen-unstable and am getting the following via ''xm dmesg'': (XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:374: RMRR error: base_addr d0000000 end_address cfffffff (XEN) Failed to parse ACPI DMAR. Disabling VT-d. My grub.conf looks like this: kernel /xen.gz vga=mode-0x0317 vtd=1 iommu=1

Fix addr_to_dma_page() issue to return l1e correctly, and also clean up rmrr mapping code, make sure setup rmrr identify mapping just once per domain. This patch fixes the VT-d bug (Fail to boot smp Linux guest with VT-d NIC assigned on IA32e platform). Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

This patch maps RMRR in intel_iommu_add_device() if the device has RMRR; move domain_context_mapping() to be in front of list_move() in reassign_device_ownership(). Currently, hypervisor sets up devices and RMRR for dom0, and dom0 also adds devices for itself via hypercall. This is obviously duplicate. In order to allow old dom0 kernels to work with iommu-capable platforms, maybe it cannot be

Greetings, I''m attempting to do gfx_passthru with the primary graphics adapter (03:00.0), passing it to a guest. I can unbind it from the host but when I fire up the guest OS my monitor loses signal from the graphics card and that''s that. The GFX card is dual DVI, I''ve tried both slots. Host is Linux 2.6.32.14-1.2.105.xendom0.fc12.x86_64, Guest is Windows 7. PC is an

<<handle_msi_irq_storm.patch>> Hi, Keir, This patch handles MSI irq storm. Unluckily, I have observed this phenomenon again. This will happen when some kind of MSI-X capable NIC is assigned to an HVM guest. The basic idea is to mask the interrupt on receiving the second interrupt and set a timer to unmask after 1ms. Can you have a look and give some comments on that? Thanks! Best

Xen Users, Has anyone on the list been able to run Xen 4 on an Intel DX58S02 board? Sincerely, John McDermott ---- What is the formal meaning of the one-line program #include "/dev/tty" J.P. McDermott building 12 Code 5542 john.mcdermott@nrl.navy.mil Naval Research Laboratory voice: +1 202.404.8301 Washington, DC 20375, US fax: +1 202.404.7942

Hey guys, I am posting this again....because i didnt get any replay. Please I am doing my thesis and I am stack installing a guest machine from Yocto, a unix like machine. It boots successfully on the same host without xen. thank you again, Nas On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:37 PM, nesredin mahmud <nasmitlinux@gmail.com>wrote: > hello everyone, > > I am experiencing DomU booting

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64 Version: 4.4.1-9+deb8u3 Severity: grave Hello, I am trying to install the XEN Hypervisor on a Debian Jessie Server. When I am booting without the Hypervisor, everything works fine, but when I am Booting WITH the XEN-Hypervisor, then System crashes / reboots after the "Scrubbing Free RAM" Message without any Error-message, just a blank screen.

Jan, I was given a machine to diagnose a boot problem on xen 4.3, that used to work on 4.2, and have bisected to the following changeset: commit d0d4635d034f202bb401a6efa3ba61530f3854ab Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Date: Thu Nov 22 10:47:58 2012 +0100 implement vmap() ... and use it as basis for a proper ioremap() on x86. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

tmoore wrote: > > > I`ve raised a support case with ASUS to try to get them to fix the BIOS on > P6T Deluxe ... I`ll keep this thread updated. > > The IOMMU is seriously broken on this board, I have tried many workarounds > and it always results in failure. > > > Hello, did you get a reply? Somebody else has something new about the Asus P6T and this problem? How

Xen 3.4 xen-unstable.hg from yesterday with debian etch on 64bit arch Intel/Lenovo Q35 Mainboard with VT-d enabled Bootoptions iommu=1 vtd=1 pci.backhide for a PCI-E nvidia graphiccard xm dmesg Error messages includes: [VT-D] iommu.c: 1694:d32767 iommu: mapping reserved region failed [VT-D] iommu.c: 1542:d0 intel_iommu_add_device: context mapping failed If i try to start my HVM by xm create

x86:x2apic: Disable x2apic on x86-32 permanently x2apic initialization on x86_32 uses vcpu pointer before it is initialized. As x2apic is unlikely to be used on x86_32, this patch disables x2apic permanently on x86_32. It also asserts the sanity of vcpu pointer before dereference to prevent further misuse. Signed-off-by: Fengzhe Zhang <fengzhe.zhang@intel.com> diff -r 02c0af2bf280

Hello, I''m having problems with VTD on this board. The board/cpu/bios all support vt-d and I think maybe I''m just missing something? Any feedback would be much appreciated :) Output below: root@vm:~# xm create /etc/xen/vm-nine.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/vm-nine.cfg". Error: Failed to assign device to IOMMU (0000:05:00.0@100,msitranslate=1,power_mgmt=0)