similar to: reverse proxy

Hi, I'm using openssh 3.9p1, and here is what bothers me. If ssh is executed from an X application, when a password is prompted, ssh manages to grap on to /dev/tty, but then the SIGTTOU is constantly sent to the ssh and that loops the password prompt function infinetely, since it actually gets to the console. Because of Solaris implemenation (I guess), that also gives no cycles to other

I am not even sure this is a shorewall issue as kernel, iptables, and shorewall have all recently been updated. Shorewall Version: 4.2.9 Iptables Version: v1.4.3.2 Kernel Version: 2.6.30-rc8 OS: Centos 4.7 X86_64 I see the following on std-output and /var/log/messages Jun 4 22:17:27 firewall shorewall: Compiling... Jun 4 22:17:29 firewall kernel: Netfilter messages via NETLINK v0.30. Jun

dear all, first part of log snippet is to show a bit of contrast, to me it's peculiar situation it's about messages between local users, actually one user, when I use command line mailx or anther local account to send to A_local user - ok second part is this weir error, it's selinux which prevents deliver write to /tmp, I believe thsese messages are from A_local user cron jobs(to

On Sun, October 27, 2019 9:37 am, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Why do you care about the server license if you're writing an application > (i.e. a client)? Not the OP, but I will tell you why it is important. GPL, as you know, is put in place to protect the opensource aspect of the code, and as such requires the changes be published for modifications that are done on top of the existing

Hi All, I have just installed Asterisk and am trying to connect it to a SIP account that I currently have with www.voiptalk.org but without any success. Although I know that voiptalk do provide asterisk accounts I don't want to convert the SIP account until am happy that it's gonna work for me. The asterisk box is currently behind a firewall and the following ports are being forwarded

Hi Samba folks, I had a couple questions about password complexity checking. To preface, in smb.conf, we set: check password script = /usr/local/sbin/crackcheck -d /usr/share/cracklib/pw_dict Also, if I understand correctly: /usr/local/sbin/crackcheck comes from samba source rpm package. maybe we need to compile it ourselves. /usr/share/cracklib/pw_dict* comes from cracklib-dicts rpm

Hey there people, i've been scouring the voip-info.org wiki for a few hours and dont seem to be able to do anything in regards to this, so I hope someone can help me here. Now i Have my current configuration as thus.. X-Ten (SIP) -> Asterisk -> Mutliple Peers via SIP or IAX2 Now on one of those SIP Peers id like to call users by their usernames... eg netadmin@some-isp.net, however I

On 12/11/2019 19:24, andi via samba wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 05:27:03PM +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> >> The IP above is 192.168.183.1, yet the IP for kronos (the DC) is >> 192.168.0.5, so it will not be fine. > Just for my understanding: The lines "Server:" and "Address:" refer to the DNS server which > responded the query,

Hello, I have just subscribed to the list. I am having problems with the Ajax.InPlaceEditor. I am getting different results when I use Firefox and IE. The problem is: On IE, when I click submit in the InPlaceEditor form, the form posts to itself (my InPlaceEditor code is on /test/index.html, and the form posts to /test/index.html) and passes a paramater of ''value''

Hi, (moving back to the list as some bits can be useful to everyone) > I am sure that 75 is the length of payload only. Confirmed > I also don't have idea for the package containing data of a length 46. > > To make everything more clear, Payload type in rtp packages is 97. > SDP defines the stream as > a=rtpmap: 97 SPEEX/8000 That's a dynamic payload number, so it

Not sure what a payload of 75 bytes could be. Are you sure that doesn't include the 12-byte RTP header? Other than that, maybe it's using wideband (although there's nothing that corresponds exactly to 75 bytes. If you send me the hexdump for one packet, I may be able to find out what it is. Jean-Marc Pawel Cyrta wrote: > Hello to all speex developers, > > I have question

On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <pawel at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > Bill, > >> Hi Pawel, >> >> Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.). > > Sure. > > But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please

Pawel, First, all your help with the 3.2 release is greatly appreciated. I do not think anyone is saying otherwise. I apologize for the lack of documentation regarding this issue. I do ask that you consult with previous release manager (myself or Bill) to determine what the best course of action is. There is a lot of room to improve our release process, but its a collaborative effort. You are

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com>wrote: > On 1/10/2013 7:32 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have been following this discussion for a while and I think the > >> question we should

On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:37 +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > virtio_device_is_legacy_only is always false now, > drop the test from virtio mmio. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Slightly ironic ack ;-) after all the battle you fought for this: Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com> Thanks! Pawel

On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 18:37 +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > virtio_device_is_legacy_only is always false now, > drop the test from virtio mmio. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Slightly ironic ack ;-) after all the battle you fought for this: Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll at arm.com> Thanks! Pawel

Anton, > Pawel, > > We all understand that you're pretty new to release process, etc., but > I think you should understand the implications of your actions. > > You just created a lot of harm for really huge pile of users - the > ones who downloads the tarball via some automated build system and > rely on the known good checksum. This includes, but not limited to to

On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 9:54 PM, David Newall <openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote: > On 25/12/17 00:11, John Devitofranceschi wrote: >> >> Besides ssh.com?s PrivX product, has anyone created a web service that can >> be used to issue temporary certkeys to authenticated users? >> >> Any pointers appreciated! > > > I expect that what I'm about to

Hi Pawel, 2011/7/26 Pawel Sikora <pluto at agmk.net> > On Tuesday 26 of July 2011 14:33:15 you wrote: > > Hi Pawel, > > > > 2011/7/26 Pawel Sikora <pluto at agmk.net> > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > i have an orvaldi ups > > > http://en.orvaldi.com/index.php/en/product_catalog/product_view/11/162 > > > and it works

Alright, can you please pull in r169280? On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 12/4/2012 10:14 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > What is the procedure for updating the release notes? I've been > committing > > changes to the trunk version, should I be editing them elsewhere? Or > will > > the trunk version be