similar to: monolithic versus modules

tools/firmware: remove "_PS0/3" Method Do not expose the ACPI power management "_PS0/3" Method to guest firmware. According to section 3.4 of the APCI specification 4.0, PCI device control the device power through its own specification but not through APCI. Qemu pushes "_PS0/3" to guest will cause a mess between ACPI PM and PCI PM as a result of incorrect ACPI table

Hello, We have a number of systems running KM400 chipsets from VIA (Socket A/462). Two different models have produced the same results -- DFI KM400-MLV and MSI KM4M-V. When a /sbin/reboot or /sbin/shutdown -r now is issued, the system does everything you would expect from a reboot, but when it gets to Rebooting System, it hangs and requires a power cycle. The logs do not indicate anything

On 1/30/2015 1:53 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/29/2015 05:07 AM, Jatin Davey wrote: >> Yes , it is a SATA disk. I am not sure of the speed. Can you tell me >> how to find out this information ? Additionally we are using RAID 10 >> configuration with 4 disks. > > What RAID controller are you using? > > # lspci | grep RAID [Jatin] [root at localhost ~]# lspci |

Does anyone know what program can be used to query the RAID status from the OS for an on-board LSI SAS 2308-4i? On this page: http://docs.avagotech.com/docs/12351997 there is a curious note on the left that reads: "Integrated MegaRAID support available upon request" After one mostly fruitless round of chatting with LSI/Avago/Broadcom and one completely fruitless round of chatting

I just had an IBM in a remote location with a hardware raid1 have both drives go bad. With local machines I probably would have caught it from the drive light before the 2nd one died... What is the state of the art in linux software monitoring for this? Long ago when that box was set up I think the best I could have done was a Java GUI tool that IBM had for their servers - and that seemed like

On Thursday 02 November 2017 14:10:25 Bowie Bailey wrote: > If you want raid 5 or 6, then you should get a hardware controller. For > raid 1, mdadm should work just fine.? I would suggest trying it before > buying a raid controller.? If it works for you, you save a few hundred > dollars and you have one less piece of hardware to worry about. > > I haven't looked at them in

On Wednesday 09 July 2008 13:24, Devang Patel wrote: > Is it possible to explain intended use of original unoptimized version ? bugpoint. I want to run it on the IR produced by our frontend. This will help us generate new LLVM tests we can send upstream. We've fixed bugs that aren't caught by the upstream tests and it would be nice to capture the problem and make the test

Hello, We are planning to replace our current PBX with an Asterisk / SIP solution, and are now trying to decide which phones to get. My first thought was the Cisco 7960G, but the Cisco licensing scheme irritates me enough that I'll probably end up going with either the Polycom IP-600 or Snom 360. If anyone has any opinions of these phones, especially in comparison to each other, I would

On the trunk version of LLVM I am getting the following build error on Snow Leopard (v10.6.2): llvm[3]: Building X86.td DAG instruction selector implementation with tblgen Assertion failed: (LHS->ID != RHS->ID), function operator(), file /Users/peckw/Projects/llvm/llvm-pristine/utils/TableGen/DAGISelEmitter.cpp, line 183. ... <cut - see full_stack_trace.txt> 0. Program arguments:

On Wednesday 09 July 2008 13:49, David Greene wrote: > > then it seems you're doing > > > > for each function > > generate_ir > > convert_to_llvm_ir > > optimize_llvm_ir > > Yep. Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: 1. As each function comes in for op/codegen, clone it and save off the clone and its associated ValueMap (I

Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> Hello, > Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: > Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" > Miloslav> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). >

Hello, I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you for the comments as from people around the Dovecot? We are using btrfs RAID-10 (/data, 4.7TB) on a physical Supermicro server with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @

On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Wednesday 09 July 2008 13:49, David Greene wrote: > >>> then it seems you're doing >>> >>> for each function >>> generate_ir >>> convert_to_llvm_ir >>> optimize_llvm_ir >> >> Yep. > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > 1. As

Hello, I'm trying to work out a way to have my Sieve filter save a "pristine" version of email messages as a backup, primarily to use for training the spam filter. I would like is to have every message saved into a single, site-wide directory (in the global sieve) before being processed additionally and delivered. The messages in that directory will be used to train the spam

Hi Not sure if this is the place to ask this or not. I''ve upgraded to RSpec 1.0.5, installed the latest TextMate bundle, but whenever I do "Run Behaviour Descriptions in selected files/directories" I get this: /Users/ashleymoran/Library/Application Support/TextMate/Pristine Copy/ Bundles/RSpec.tmbundle/Support/lib/spec_mate.rb:18:in `run_files'': private method

Hi All, The landed patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D38481 introduced the usage of CPU_COUNT defined in glibc sched.h header. I failed to find this symbol in sched.h of glibc version 2.5-24, so compilation just fails. /home/dolphin/merge-from-upstream-area/ws/pristine/lib/Support/Threading.cpp: In function 'unsigned int llvm::hardware_concurrency()':

On 2/2/2015 8:11 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: > disk 252:1 | 0-0-0 | 9XG7TNQVST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:2 | 0-0-1 | 9XG4M4X3ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:3 | 0-1-1 | 9XG4LY7JST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:4 | 0-1-0 | 9XG51233ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > End of Output ************************** > > Let me know if i need to

This patch ports 5 new applications to the stubdom makefile structure for inclusion into stubdom domains. While these are required for vtpm-stubdom and vtpmmgrdom they could be used with other stubdom applications. -libgmp 4.3.2 -openssl 1.0.0a -polarssl 0.12.1 -berlios tpm_emulator 0.6.1 -vtpm_manager (from the tools directory) Signed off by: Matthew Fioravante

I am install Samba on a New RS/6000 M 80. I am installing Samba 2.0.7. I have the services and inedt.conf files with the needed entries and have add a program check my entry. I get the following error in the log file and can not figure out what is wrong. [2001/01/17 12:31:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(863) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Address already in use)

On Friday 11 July 2008 12:05, Devang Patel wrote: > > Ok, I've mostly got a mechanism to do what I want: > > > > 1. As each function comes in for op/codegen, clone it and save off > > the clone and its associated ValueMap (I call these clones > > "pristine" > > functions. > > > > 2. After all processing is done, clone the resulting