similar to: Unable to find root device. domU??

I cannot boot domU: # xm create inhouse Using config file "inhouse". Started domain inhouse # xm list Name ID Mem(MiB) CPU VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 123 0 1 r----- 27.4 inhouse 8 2048 0 1 ------ 11.4 # xm console inhouse Linux version 2.6.12.6-xenU ( root@xen1) (gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease)

We have a Xen 3.0 / Linux kernel 2.6.15 machine with the domU''s configured for shared /home directories. One of the domU''s is an NFS server, exporting /home, and the other domU''s all mount this. It all functions fine, but it''s pretty slow. I tried untarring a recent Linux kernel tarball. On the NFS server domU this takes about 25 seconds. I didn''t

Hi, I want to run a i386 domU on my AMD64. I created a LVM partition with Debian Sarge i386 on it, and set everything up. Now for the compilation of the kernel for i386. In "linux-2.6.12-xenU/" , make ARCH=xen menuconfig, i did: Processor Type (X86) (which was selected, and compiled with X86_64 before) Processor family (Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8) [*] Generic x86 support if

Hi, I want to run a i386 domU on my AMD64. I created a LVM partition with Debian Sarge i386 on it, and set everything up. Now for the compilation of the kernel for i386. In "linux-2.6.12-xenU/" , make ARCH=xen menuconfig, i did: Processor Type (X86) (which was selected, and compiled with X86_64 before) Processor family (Opteron/Athlon64/Hammer/K8) [*] Generic x86 support if

When does vif0.0 get created? Is there some shell magic? I''m trying to figure out how to do a similar peth1/veth1 split for eth1. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, Someone already use xen as production server? For example: 3 domains (mail, proxy and web server). And what about stability? Regards, Marlon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I would like to run multiple copies of an application on a PC with multiple remote dumb clients. It would seem to me that running Xen would be a sub-optimal solution as I would need a copy of the OS running for every copy of the application, but I was wondering whether a subset of Xen or Xen techniques could be used. There are 2 barriers to running multiple applications with remote access: -

Hello I use XEN 3.0 in debian sarge. I have a domU1 for routing and firewall. This domU1 use 2 network interfaces which is on a bridge ''gate'' and the other on bridge ''lan''. dumU2 use one interface (eth0) on bridge ''lan''. Then I make a ping out of domU2 to www.debian.de so I get no answer. The name isn''t resolved. A ping to IP of

Hello, I have running xen over a debian server (debian sarge). Now I would like to configure a domU with redhat (AS 4), do you now any way to install it? -- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o) y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\ http://www.um.es/atica _(___V Tfo: 968367590 Fax: 968398337

On 21/02/06, Bráulio Gergull <gergull@getnet.com.br> wrote: > Hi, > > I''ve had a similar problem. I found it to be due to crc checksum errors. > > I solved that with "ethtool -K ethN tx off" on all domU''s. > > I found some related info on the following thread: > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-01/msg00088.html

Has anyone done any performance profiling for Xen on different platforms? I''m wondering if the big (50%+) memory latency advantage the Opteron''s have over the Xeon''s makes a big difference in the context of a Xen host with multiple active guest domains. Particularly at the moment I''m considering the 2-way situation with the SunFire v20z vs the Intel SR1400JR2.

Can''t seem to fully boot a domU on either EM64T or Opteron with x86_64 xen-unstable. Both systems'' report this from xen: (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=872) Non-priv domain attempted WRMSR(00000000c0000100. (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=872) Non-priv domain attempted WRMSR(00000000c0000102. (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=880) Non-priv domain attempted RDMSR(00000000c0000080. They boot

The Patch I made for SMP dom0 is also applicable to SMP domU. The issue is same for dom0 & domu as they both are compiled from the same code. The dom0 fix I sent earlier also fixes the domU SMP issue. Thanks & Regards, Nitin ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corp >-----Original Message-----

Hi,all: My name is Wei Wu and I would like to participate in Google Summer of Code 2011.I'm willing to improve LLVM's support for profile information,follow Bob Wilson's proposal[1].After read his proposal I have some questions below: 1.Is the "__builtin_expect" works now and how to use it? I have searched llvm's trunk and found it in two files

Hi, I'm running Asterisk 1.0.8 on Gentoo, with an X100P (clone) card, and I'm having problems with Caller ID. I have run clidtest, and it seems happy enough, returning:- server clidtest # ./clidtest /dev/zap/1 Number: 0412222222, Name: MOBILE (that number's fake.) However, I'm not getting the caller ID passed through with *. Sometimes I get a "failed checksum" like

Hello, Do you know what this means : kvm: 2918: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x345 kvm: 2918: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x1c9 kvm: 2918: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x1a6 kvm: 2918: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x1a7 kvm: 2918: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x3f6 tap110i0: no IPv6 routers present kvm: 2952: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x345 kvm: 2952: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x1c9 kvm: 2952: cpu0 unhandled rdmsr: 0x1a6 kvm: 2952: cpu0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, rsync v3.0.7 I am backing up data to a USB memory drive that is formatted FAT32, which does not comprehend linux permissions. I added the "--no-perms" option to the option set. rsync still attempts to change the permissions. OPTS = "--no-perms --archive --stats --delete --itemize-changes - --quiet

Since C8.1 kvm guests have a huge delay while booting on a kvm host based on C6. This delay was not present with C8.0. The "pause" happend direct after the grub step. The VNC session shows only a "_" character. Any ideas what changes? -- Leon

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:40:07AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/19/2014 09:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > Linux detects what hypervior it runs on very early > > Not anywhere close to early enough. We're talking for uses like kASLR. > Still to early to do: h = cpuid(HYPERVIOR_SIGNATURE) if (h == KVMKVMKVM) { if (cpuid(kvm_features) &

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:40:07AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/19/2014 09:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > > Linux detects what hypervior it runs on very early > > Not anywhere close to early enough. We're talking for uses like kASLR. > Still to early to do: h = cpuid(HYPERVIOR_SIGNATURE) if (h == KVMKVMKVM) { if (cpuid(kvm_features) &