similar to: [PATCH] reenable pygrub build

This series: 1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07 2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and make the linker do more heavy lifting 3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth of 16-bit setup code. 4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the

This series: 1. Updates the boot protocol to version 2.07 2. Clean up the existing build process, to get rid of tools/build and make the linker do more heavy lifting 3. Make the bzImage payload an ELF file. The bootloader can extract this as a naked ELF file by skipping over boot_params.setup_sects worth of 16-bit setup code. 4. Update the boot_params to 2.07, and update the

The system is Mandrake-9.1 Linux wih gcc-3.2.2. I am trying to compile xenolinux-2.4.24 (with vanilla sources from ftp.kernel.org for linux-2.4.24). The steps of mkbuildtree ARCH=xeno make menuconfig ARCH=xeno make dep produce no errors, but ARCH=xeno make bzImage results in following error messages. Any pointers will be appreciated. -ishwar --- gcc -D__KERNEL__

Hi all I have a Zenith N-Station (1997) P166 64 Mb of Ram it has a Intel LANDesk Service Agent version 0.98i it doesn't seem to be flashable I have tried methode from http://syslinux.zytor.com/pxe.php Each time I use ethereal to check the protocol The behavior is quite strange : I have the "Boot :" line the pxelinux is loading correctly But when I ask my image pxe, I have dumps

This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some

This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some

This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which adds fields to specify the hardware subarchitecture and some

Well, it seems to be about time to have this conversation again. A rough overview of the previous thread and requirements is: 1. bzImage would not be a bare ELF file, but it would contain an ELF header+file within it 2. We need some way to add extra ELF notes into that ELF file 3. We use a "paravirtualized" bootloader type, with some other field to determine which

Well, it seems to be about time to have this conversation again. A rough overview of the previous thread and requirements is: 1. bzImage would not be a bare ELF file, but it would contain an ELF header+file within it 2. We need some way to add extra ELF notes into that ELF file 3. We use a "paravirtualized" bootloader type, with some other field to determine which

Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths

Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths

[ This patch depends on the cross-architecture ELF cleanup patch. ] This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which

[ This patch depends on the cross-architecture ELF cleanup patch. ] This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under, and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code. Specifically: - Update the boot protocol to 2.07, which

There are at least four clang frontends for offloading to accelerators: 1 Cuda clang 2 OpenMP 3 HCC and 4 OpenCL. These frontends will want to embed object code for multiple offload targets into a single application binary to provide portability across different subarchitectures (e.g. sm_35, sm_50) and across different architectures (e.g nvptx64,amdgcn). Problem: Different frontends

I''ve addressed all (I think/hope) of the review comments. The main change is to expose the guest virtual platform (e.g. memory layout and interrupt usage etc) to the toolstack via the public interface. This is then used during FDT generation. I have just codified the current defacto standard layout, it''s probably not the best layout but any change can be a separate patch/series.

I would like to host a phone meeting to discuss the plans for the xen sub-architecture of x86. Hopefully Chris can share his vision and we can agree on some next steps to getting this done and into the mainline kernel. From my understanding, it would be good if the "To" list could make it. If anyone believes others should attend, please let them know. Please let me know if you are

I would like to host a phone meeting to discuss the plans for the xen sub-architecture of x86. Hopefully Chris can share his vision and we can agree on some next steps to getting this done and into the mainline kernel. From my understanding, it would be good if the "To" list could make it. If anyone believes others should attend, please let them know. Please let me know if you are

Christian Hesse <list at eworm.de> on Tue, 2013/10/22 13:14: > Christian Hesse <list at eworm.de> on Tue, 2013/10/22 12:56: > > Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> on Tue, 2013/10/22 06:35: > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Christian Hesse <list at eworm.de> wrote: > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > > > iPXE builds

Biggest change is to switch the new DTB node to /xen-core-devices instead of /xen at Stefano''s request. I also dropped the few patches title HACK etc which weren''t supposed to be there and fixed up some bits and pieces which folks commented on. George, WRT the freeze I think this is functionality which we cannot ship Xen 4.4 without. The impact is entirely constrained to the

On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > Thank you for this meaningful report. Ideally, I would suggest > performing a similar test (at least with the same kernel built with all > the above "config_*=y" settings) with official pre-built Syslinux > versions 4.07 and 3.86 (remembering that all Syslinux-related files, > including c32 modules, if being used, shall