similar to: renamed partial won''t render?

I thought I''d seen some discussion on this, but can''t find it. I have a text area that I''d like to save on blur unless the user clicks cancel. Anyone got a nice example of this? It''s non-obvious to me how I force the submit via javascript. Thanks, pt. -- Parker Thompson http://www.parkert.com/ 510.541.0125

R-users it appears I am leaning on your knowledge once again.  Is there any way to add a vertical line to a histogram and qplot "stacked" plot?  Here is my current attempt:   "qplot" approach attempt: qplot(Run, data = data_dataframe, breaks = breaks, fill = Temperature, main = short_title) + scale_x_continuous("Data") + scale_y_continuous("Freq")

hi all i''m trying to pass a variable name right round the block and need a hand to ease my aching brain. ##in my sidebar i have <li><%= SidebarItem(''catalogue'') %></li> <li><%= SidebarItem(''provenance'') %></li> <li><%= SidebarItem(''status'') %></li> ##linked to a

I've been using qplot pretty successfully to generate stacked histograms.  However, it appears that I need to tweak the colors a little.    I've got three temperature variables (characters not numeric) and I need to change from the default qplot colors to the following: Low = Blue Middle = black High = Red   Here is pseudo code of what I have currently:qplot(Run, data = TestData, breaks =

Tracing down some things to add in validators and I''ve run across something that kinda bothers me... In order to implement validators you have to override the clone method. The directors seems to be set up to specifically handle this situation. However, whenever C++ calls back to the object''s methods the swig_get_up function is returning false. It seems like swig_up

I don't know if this is a bug. I can reproduce the following on Ubuntu 12.04.2 and 13.04 64-bit with R version 3.0.1 and with r63479. There is no difference if R is patched with the fix for PR#15407 or not, although without the fix there are more ways to trigger this. I can reproduce with the following: 1. Open R in gnome-terminal or xterm 2. Run 'library(tcltk)' 3. Run

LLVM has two similar bits of infrastructure: a simplifyInstructionsInBlock function and a SimplifyInstructions pass, both intended to be lightweight “fix up this code without doing serious optimizations” functions, as far as I can tell. I don’t think either is used in a performance-sensitive place in-tree; the former is mostly called in minor places when doing CFG twiddling, and the latter seems

The following program does not exit cleanly after pressing ''Yes'' when asked ''Are you sure''? How do I free up the resources after exiting? You can use wxsugar (xrcise) to try out this mini program if you wish to create sample1.rb . Thank you. -Philip =========== asample1.rb ==================================================== require ''wx''

... and a small initial patch which makes it easier to test virt-p2v without having to start up a virtual machine. There is still a bug in Gtk 3 where the GtkTextView on the final (running) dialog ignores gtk_widget_set_size_request and so the window appears just a single pixel high. Rich.

Hi, I am writing an analysis which requires creating worklist of basic blocks. The worklist should be in FIFO order. I checked SmallVector (and similar others) and found out this is working in LIFO order when I use the functions push_back and pop_back_val to insert and delete elements in the worklist. Can someone suggest an appropriate DS to implement my worklist. Note: I am not concerned about

This is basically the same as what I posted earlier today. The main difference is I split out the GDK thread sychronization (removal of) changes from the other Gtk 2/3 changes, which should make it a bit easier to review. Gtk 3 is still not quite perfect. Apart from the problem with the GtkTextView noted before, there are also vertical alignment and padding problems with labels in GtkGrid

What I am trying to do is use GUI function, traitr, and to call for a pdb file and save it and then display it. I want to call for it by taking it from the user and then displaying it on the screen. I am having problems with that. The line pdb <- read.pdb(""ProteinCode) where proteincode should be the name of the protein, for example 1ly2, but it always ends up being protein. My

Hi all, I''m looking for a way to get a block of code to execute once a modal dialog has been displayed (via a call to show_modal.) I was hoping to find some event that would fire when the window was shown, but the only one that seemed vaguely promising (evt_window_create) seems to do nothing at all, at least in my environment (Ruby 1.9.1 on Win32, wxruby 2.0.1.) Here''s a

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > and since result of *it is considered to be rvalue it can't be accepted > > by this operator. The complete discussion is in > > > > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1385.htm > > > > I'd suggest to apply the following patch which makes operator* return >

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:58 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> There are a few places where we break the assumption: >> 1> formal_parameter constructed in DwarfDebug when adding attribute type >> we call SPCU->addType(Arg, ATy),

Thank you David for prompt reply. I tried with SmallVector. I inserted elements with push_back(). But when I retrieve elements using pop_back_val the elements are returned in reverse order of insertion (I mean like LIFO order). I need this to be FIFO order. How to achieve that? Regards, Rekha On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > If you

The root problem is that, when A gets modified, D doesn't get added back to the worklist. I could match the pattern on A, but the problem remains: when D gets modified, A do not get added back tot he worklist. I also considered ding several round of DAGCombine, but it is very easy to run into infinite loops, even with a fair amount of sanity checks. 2017-05-22 7:30 GMT-07:00 Nirav Davé

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:58 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> There are a few places where we break the assumption:

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Yea, I've noticed that. However, it looks like inst_iterator is iterator over > pointers. Oh, wait a minite, that's the current code: > > inline IIty operator*() const { return BI; } > inline IIty operator->() const { return operator*(); } > > So operator* works as if value_type is Instruction*, but operator->

Explicitly re-adding a node to be processed doesn't work, because the processing order is canonical. 2017-05-22 11:39 GMT-07:00 Nirav Davé <niravd at google.com>: > You can always explicitly add D to the worklist when you make the > transformation with AddToWorklist. Presuambly this was the cause for your > infinite loop. > > -Nirav > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at