similar to: RE: Problems creating DomUs with large memory system/PAEenabled

================== STATUS ================== I do the heavy load test of create/destroy. CREDIT scheduler(cshed_schedule) checks BUG_ON(!vcpu_running) at the end of code. It makes error. The reason is that atomic_inc(&v->pausecnt)@vcpu_pause() is called without lock. (spin_lock(&schedule_data[cpu].schedule_lock)) This lock-less "pausecnt" makes vcpu_running state changing

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeulich@novell.com] >Sent: 2006年9月12日 17:06 >To: You, Yongkang >Cc: xen-devel >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 32E (64bit) VMX keyboard is out of control, ifgiven an >addition ''hde'' > >>After creating VMX, its keyboard can not be used properly. For example, if >pressing

>5. LTP testing might run very slow in SMP VTI Domain with credit scheduler. If binding VTI >and Xen0 vcpu, this bug won''t be there. Hi keir, In credit scheduler, two vcpus in the same domain may be scheduled on the same CPU. For instance, vcpu0 and vcpu1 are running on the same CPU, vcpu0 is doing spin_lock in guest, then time slice is due, vcpu0 is scheduled out before doing

Hi all, We have tested IPF/Xen on 3.0.3rc1. The testing mainly focus on the VTI domains. It includes guest booting, memory size, vcpu number, guest installation, SMP guest, guest coexist, xm command, Xwindows and Windows 2k3. The testing results are good. There are only 6 issues found. All of them are not new. 1. VTI domain and XenU domain might meet “Can not allocate memory”. This is bug.

>-----Original Message----- >From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeulich@novell.com] >Sent: 2006年9月12日 18:05 >To: You, Yongkang >Cc: xen-devel >Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] 32E (64bit) VMX keyboard is out of control,ifgiven an >addition ''hde'' > > >Not sure what RC3 is, but the other two are Linux-es: Can you try rebuilding >the guest kernels with attached

>-----Original Message----- >From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Xin Zhao >Sent: 2006年3月21日 1:25 >To: Yura Pismerov >Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] How to share data between >guestdomains > >The benefits of VL inlcude: >1. A VM can take advantage of the

>-----Original Message----- >From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Liang Yang >Sent: 2006年9月19日 8:36 >To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >Subject: [Xen-users] How to configure VBD hard disk drives in Linux >HVMdomain? >how to do it in the config file? Your config is partly right. But it also needs a Qemu

Hi, This issue only happens on my IA32E VMX domain. IA32 VMX domain is okay. I am trying VBD disk in IA32E VMX domain. I used following disk configuration to create an IA32E VMX domain. disk = [ ''file:/mnt/disk1.img,hda,w'', ''file:/mnt/disk2.img,hde,w'' ] After creating VMX, its keyboard can not be used properly. For example, if pressing

>-----Original Message----- >From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk] >Sent: 2006年9月12日 18:02 >To: You, Yongkang; Jan Beulich >Cc: xen-devel; ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk >Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] 32E (64bit) VMX keyboard is out of control,ifgiven an >addition ''hde'' > >Do you mean that with a plain 32b or 32b PAE hypervisor the problem

All. I am running Xen on an ES7000 system with 4 procs and 4 GB memory. I am running Suse Sles-9 (32-bit) on the machine. I have compiled Xen (the tip on the unstable tree : 6552) with PAE enabled (XEN_TARGET_X86_PAE=y). The system boots fine. I started xend and when I tried to bring up a virtual machine, the system gave me the following error on the command line. On the serial port, I saw an

Hi all, I found this problem in the latest xen-unstable 6117. I reported a bug #154 to track it. The log====> <...> gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix include -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe - I/home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen-unstable-6096- 20050812/xen/include -I/home/nightly/builds_xen_unstable/xen-3.0-hg-xen-

>-----Original Message----- >From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Liang Yang >Sent: 2006年9月12日 8:57 >To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com >Subject: [Xen-users] Help: Xen HVM Domain can ONLY support four hard >drivesat most??? > >Hi, > >I have 5 SATA hard drives and I want to expose all these five

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Fixed issue ================================================= 1) save&restore hvm guest will cause dom0 crash http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=962 2) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 3) Build HVM PV driver failed

This issue only happened on creating VTI domain in IPF platform. Creating IA32 or IA32E VMX domain is okay. Best Regards, Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 >-----Original Message----- >From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Zhang, >Jingke >Sent: 2006年10月11日 16:35 >To: xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi all, We have done simply IPF/Xen functional testing towards Xen 3.0.3 RC2 (Changeset 11686:f426f6e646eb from xen-3.0.3-testing tree). The result is good. Totally 16 cases are all pass. Testing environments: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL version: 8.15 Scheduler: credit Service OS: RHEL4u3 Guest OS: RHEL4u3/Windows

Hi all, We have done simply IPF/Xen functional testing towards Xen 3.0.3 RC2 (Changeset 11686:f426f6e646eb from xen-3.0.3-testing tree). The result is good. Totally 16 cases are all pass. Testing environments: Platform: Tiger4 Processor: Itanium 2 Processor Logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Due Core) PAL version: 8.15 Scheduler: credit Service OS: RHEL4u3 Guest OS: RHEL4u3/Windows

Hi,All We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Two platforms (PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue (1) ================================================ 1) Fails to restore VMX guests http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=929 Issues List (3):

New issues (2) ================================================= 1) HVM guest can not boot up with qcow image. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 2) Disk I/O performance of IA32-pae HVM guest is very slow http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 3) xen0 hang or crash when destroy VMX guest if not enable "debug=y"

We have tested the latest xen on VT platform with Intel 915/E8500 chipset. Three platforms (32/PAE/32E) test all are based on SMP, It means that we boot up SMP guest OS in VMX. Here is the test summary: New issue ================================================ No new issue Issues List: ================================================ 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t