similar to: request for help

I just built LLVM 2.0 on Windows with Visual C++ 2005. After a few tweaks, it produced several nice .exe files. I tried to compile a simple Hello-World program as given in the documentation: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ; Declare the string constant as a global constant... %.LC0 = internal constant [13 x i8 ] c"hello

> > I volunteer. As soon as I get everything to work. > > > > Next problem: I now have the hello.bc file compiled. But how do I get an executable from this? I tried: > > > > C:\Eigenes\compiler\llvm-2.0\win32\release>llvm-ld -o=hellow.exe hellow.bc > > llvm-ld: Could not find llvm-stub.exe executable! > > > > So, I don't have

I am new to R, so I beg your indulgence. > a='hello world' > if (grep('hellow',a)) { print("wow") } else { print("wow2") } Error in if (grep("hellow", a)) { : argument is of length zero What is the proper syntax to ensure that "wow2" gets printed? Thank you for your help! Dan [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi guys im having a problem getting R to numerically integrate for some function, say f(bhat)*optimize(G(bhat)), over bhat. Where id like to integrate this over some finite range, so that here as we integrate over bhat optimize would return a different optimum. For instance consider this simple example for which I cannot get R to return the desired result: f <- function(bhat) exp(bhat) g

Hello Everyone, I'm currently learning about quantile regressions. I've been using an optimizer to compare with the rq() command for quantile regression. When I run the code, the results show that my coefficients are consistent with rq(), but the intercept term can vary by a lot. I don't think my optimizer code is wrong and suspects it has something to do with the starting

I have noticed a definite loss of numerical precision going from 1.1.1 to 1.2.x under both Windows 98 and NT4 on x86 architecture. I noticed the difference when using the abcnon() function in the bootstrap package, but I think you could see the problem in any routine that involves subtracting relatively large numbers from each other. For the case I am looking at (see code below), the abcnon

On Sunday 25 November 2007 20:01, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:49, Jon Harrop wrote: > > On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> If ocamlc is on your path, then 'configure; make; make install' > >> should install the bindings in your ocaml lib. > > > > Right. I hadn't noticed they were already installed

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Gesendet: 12.06.07 19:24:12 > An: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Betreff: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM binaries for Windows and more > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Andreas Rumpf wrote: > > I want to use LLVM for my own "pet" programming

On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:49, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> If ocamlc is on your path, then 'configure; make; make install' >> should install the bindings in your ocaml lib. > > Right. I hadn't noticed they were already installed after llvm "make > install" in: > > /usr/local/lib/ocaml/

Hi! I'm trying to install package Bhat on a Win machine, had a problem and figured out a fix, but would like to report the problem and make sure the fix is correct. This is what I do: 1. Download Bhat_0.9-07.tar.gz 2. Uncompress it and compress it back to Bhat_0.9-07.zip 3. Install from the R windows gui (that apparentely requires the zip compression and cannot deal with the tar.gz) But

[mod: The first message would''ve been rejected on the grounds "no security related information", but it gives ME a warm feeling too, so I''m allowing it to piggyback on the announcement of the "fix". Note that Linux-2.1.63 simply implements a fix for the problem, instead of applying this fix, upgrading to 2.1.63 might be an option for you. Linus indicated that

Hi, I have a quick question regarding estimation of a truncation regression model (truncated above at 1) using MLE in R. I will be most grateful to you if you can help me out. The model is linear and the relationship is "dhat = bhat0+Z*bhat+e", where dhat is the dependent variable >0 and upper truncated at 1; bhat0 is the intercept; Z is the independent variable and is a uniform

Hellow, members I want to use SAMBA with disk quota support on AIX machine, but have not succeeded yet. Are there any members who could succeeded setting up SAMBA on that environment? OS:AIX4.3.3 SAMBA:2.2.5 configure option:--with-quotas First, I configured AIX's quota environment, and confirmed quota worked fine. And I accessed to SAMBA, but disk size displayed on Windows explorer did

I just ran example(glm) and happened to notice that models based on the Gamma distribution gives a t test, while the Poisson models give a z test. Why? Both are b/s.e., aren't they? I can't find documentation supporting the claim that the distribution is more like t in one case than another, except in the Gaussian case (where it really is t). Aren't all of the others approximations

Hello, Apart from the issues related to DC DB corruption we have observed few other issues: a. Domain User profile including domain password gets cached on the client PC and does not refresh itself. i. Administrator account used while joining Windows 7 or Windows XP Workstation to Domain. The Workstation joins the domain properly. The Administrator password is changed over a period of

xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead() is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path. Getting rid of xen_play_dead()'s dependency on cpu_bringup() helps in hooking on to the generic SMP booting framework. Also remove the extra call to preempt_enable() added by commit 41bd956 (xen/smp: Fix

xen_play_dead calls cpu_bringup() which looks weird, because xen_play_dead() is invoked in the cpu down path, whereas cpu_bringup() (as the name suggests) is useful in the cpu bringup path. Getting rid of xen_play_dead()'s dependency on cpu_bringup() helps in hooking on to the generic SMP booting framework. Also remove the extra call to preempt_enable() added by commit 41bd956 (xen/smp: Fix

On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-11-24, at 21:58, Jon Harrop wrote: > > - Garbage collection tuned for functional programming > > http://llvm.org/docs/GarbageCollection.html > > I've been doing some interesting work on this front. Getting Lattner- > cycles to have it reviewed and integrated is probably the biggest > challenge; LLVM

Hellow everyone, here's an other newby question. I've got a * configured with the card in the subject line. At times Asterisk fails to notice a disconet from the incoming line going into one of the FXO ports. Consequently it just keeps the line off-hook for ever and that causes my provider to mark the line aut of order. Is there any way to "help" Asterisk notice the disconect?

Hellow, * I have a problem with dial up signalling. currently I have configured asterisk server and E1 card to ISP. then other side I am having ATA to PC for connecting internet through DialUP connection. is it possible and please send me the procedure how I can do it ?? * ISP< <-> Asterisk <-> ATA <-> DIALUP -- Thanks & Regards, Vidura Senadeera, Sri Lanka.